Evaluating the discrepancies between evidence-based and community standard practices in the endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a survey study.

Abstract

Background: The practice of endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) often diverges from evidence-based standards due to various factors, including inadequate dissemination of evidence or a mismatch between evidence and real-world contexts. This survey aimed to identify discrepancies between evidence-based standard practices and community standard practices for ESCC among endoscopists.

Methods: An online survey targeting endoscopists who perform upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at least weekly was conducted to collect data on clinical practices related to ESCC diagnosis. The survey, comprising 20 questions, was disseminated through multiple professional networks. Descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression were performed to analyze the data.

Results: Data from 819 endoscopists were included in the analyses. Notably, a significant proportion employed narrow-band imaging/blue-laser imaging over iodine staining, and preferences varied based on risk assessment for ESCC. In total, 64.0% of endoscopists primarily used iodine solution at a concentration of 1% or less, while 96.5% of endoscopists performed an observation of the oral cavity and the pharynx when conducting upper gastrointestinal endoscopies on individuals at high risk of ESCC. The surveillance interval for metachronous multiple ESCCs was most commonly every 6 months, followed by every 12 months. In addition, most physicians conducted surveillance of metastatic recurrence at 6-month intervals.

Conclusions: This survey highlights significant gaps between evidence-based and community standard practices in the endoscopic diagnosis of ESCC. These findings underscore the need for enhanced dissemination of evidence-based guidelines and consideration of real-world clinical contexts to bridge these gaps and optimize patient care.