Acute cholecystitis diagnosis in the emergency department: an artificial intelligence-based approach.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03475-w
Hossein Saboorifar, Mohammad Rahimi, Paria Babaahmadi, Asal Farokhzadeh, Morteza Behjat, Aidin Tarokhian
{"title":"Acute cholecystitis diagnosis in the emergency department: an artificial intelligence-based approach.","authors":"Hossein Saboorifar, Mohammad Rahimi, Paria Babaahmadi, Asal Farokhzadeh, Morteza Behjat, Aidin Tarokhian","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03475-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm for acute cholecystitis and evaluate its effectiveness in accurately diagnosing this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a retrospective analysis of patient data from a single center, individuals with abdominal pain lasting one week or less were included. The SVM model was trained and optimized using standard procedures. Model performance was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC-ROC, with probability calibration evaluated using the Brier score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 534 patients, 198 (37.07%) were diagnosed with acute cholecystitis. The SVM model showed balanced performance, with a sensitivity of 83.08% (95% CI: 71.73-91.24%), a specificity of 80.21% (95% CI: 70.83-87.64%), and an accuracy of 81.37% (95% CI: 74.48-87.06%). The positive predictive value (PPV) was 73.97% (95% CI: 65.18-81.18%), the negative predictive value (NPV) was 87.50% (95% CI: 80.19-92.37%), and the AUC-ROC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85 to 0.93). The Brier score indicated well-calibrated probability estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SVM algorithm demonstrated promising potential for accurately diagnosing acute cholecystitis. Further refinement and validation are needed to enhance its reliability in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03475-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm for acute cholecystitis and evaluate its effectiveness in accurately diagnosing this condition.

Methods: Using a retrospective analysis of patient data from a single center, individuals with abdominal pain lasting one week or less were included. The SVM model was trained and optimized using standard procedures. Model performance was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC-ROC, with probability calibration evaluated using the Brier score.

Results: Among 534 patients, 198 (37.07%) were diagnosed with acute cholecystitis. The SVM model showed balanced performance, with a sensitivity of 83.08% (95% CI: 71.73-91.24%), a specificity of 80.21% (95% CI: 70.83-87.64%), and an accuracy of 81.37% (95% CI: 74.48-87.06%). The positive predictive value (PPV) was 73.97% (95% CI: 65.18-81.18%), the negative predictive value (NPV) was 87.50% (95% CI: 80.19-92.37%), and the AUC-ROC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85 to 0.93). The Brier score indicated well-calibrated probability estimates.

Conclusion: The SVM algorithm demonstrated promising potential for accurately diagnosing acute cholecystitis. Further refinement and validation are needed to enhance its reliability in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科的急性胆囊炎诊断:基于人工智能的方法。
研究目的本研究旨在评估支持向量机(SVM)算法对急性胆囊炎的诊断性能,并评价其在准确诊断该病症方面的有效性:方法: 通过对一个中心的患者数据进行回顾性分析,纳入了腹痛持续时间在一周或一周以内的患者。采用标准程序对 SVM 模型进行了训练和优化。通过灵敏度、特异性、准确性和 AUC-ROC 评估模型性能,并使用 Brier 评分评估概率校准:在 534 名患者中,198 人(37.07%)被诊断为急性胆囊炎。SVM 模型表现均衡,灵敏度为 83.08%(95% CI:71.73-91.24%),特异度为 80.21%(95% CI:70.83-87.64%),准确度为 81.37%(95% CI:74.48-87.06%)。阳性预测值(PPV)为 73.97%(95% CI:65.18-81.18%),阴性预测值(NPV)为 87.50%(95% CI:80.19-92.37%),AUC-ROC 为 0.89(95% CI:0.85-0.93)。Brier 评分表明概率估计校准良好:结论:SVM 算法有望准确诊断急性胆囊炎。需要进一步改进和验证,以提高其在临床实践中的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
期刊最新文献
Low vs. conventional intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study. Comparative effectiveness totally endoscopic thyroidectomy via completely submental tri-hole approach and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy without insufflation. Curative treatment for oligometastatic gastroesophageal cancer- results of a prospective multicenter study. New purse-string suture clamp and multi-functional seal cap: a simple intracorporeal circular-stapled oesophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. The importance of microvascular invasion in patients with non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1