Development and validation of the Nature Experiences Questionnaire: A brief multidimensional measure of nature connection

Leah Hague, Paula Brough, Ralf Buckley, Nicola Burton, Jason Spedding
{"title":"Development and validation of the Nature Experiences Questionnaire: A brief multidimensional measure of nature connection","authors":"Leah Hague,&nbsp;Paula Brough,&nbsp;Ralf Buckley,&nbsp;Nicola Burton,&nbsp;Jason Spedding","doi":"10.1111/apps.12565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nature connection is a common construct in research examining relationships between the natural environment and human well-being. The multidimensionality of the concept is often described but rarely reflected in existing unidimensional measures, which can also be limited by poor psychometric characteristics. This research aimed to develop and validate a new brief (9-item) multidimensional self-report measure: The Nature Experiences Questionnaire (NEQ). Scale items were formulated from a review of relevant literature and in consultation with experts. Study 1 investigated the underlying structure using exploratory factor analysis in a sample of 142 undergraduate psychology students. The resulting three-factor solution was replicated in Studies 2 and 3 using confirmatory factor analyses in independent samples of community members (<i>n</i> = 231) and workers (<i>n</i> = 2629). The NEQ was positively correlated with two existing measures of nature connection, and the three subscales (<i>nature affect</i>, <i>cognitions</i> and <i>behaviour</i>) predicted more variance in well-being. The NEQ demonstrated robust psychometric properties over time and was predictive of worker well-being, relaxation from work and job satisfaction. The implications and recommendations for the use of this measure are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.12565","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature connection is a common construct in research examining relationships between the natural environment and human well-being. The multidimensionality of the concept is often described but rarely reflected in existing unidimensional measures, which can also be limited by poor psychometric characteristics. This research aimed to develop and validate a new brief (9-item) multidimensional self-report measure: The Nature Experiences Questionnaire (NEQ). Scale items were formulated from a review of relevant literature and in consultation with experts. Study 1 investigated the underlying structure using exploratory factor analysis in a sample of 142 undergraduate psychology students. The resulting three-factor solution was replicated in Studies 2 and 3 using confirmatory factor analyses in independent samples of community members (n = 231) and workers (n = 2629). The NEQ was positively correlated with two existing measures of nature connection, and the three subscales (nature affect, cognitions and behaviour) predicted more variance in well-being. The NEQ demonstrated robust psychometric properties over time and was predictive of worker well-being, relaxation from work and job satisfaction. The implications and recommendations for the use of this measure are discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证自然体验问卷:自然联系的简明多维测量方法
在研究自然环境与人类福祉之间关系的过程中,"自然联系 "是一个常见的概念。人们经常描述这一概念的多维性,但现有的单维测量方法却很少反映出这一概念的多维性,而且这些测量方法还可能因心理测量特性较差而受到限制。本研究旨在开发并验证一种新的简短(9 个项目)多维度自我报告测量方法:自然体验问卷(NEQ)。量表项目是在查阅相关文献并咨询专家后制定的。研究 1 以 142 名心理学本科生为样本,使用探索性因子分析对其基本结构进行了调查。研究 2 和研究 3 对独立的社区成员样本(n = 231)和工人样本(n = 2629)进行了确认性因子分析,对得出的三因子解决方案进行了复制。NEQ 与现有的两种自然联系测量方法呈正相关,三个分量表(自然情感、认知和行为)预测了更多的幸福感差异。随着时间的推移,NEQ 显示出稳健的心理测量特性,并能预测工人的幸福感、工作放松程度和工作满意度。本文讨论了使用该测量方法的意义和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Who uses abusive supervision to punish deviant employees? An integration of identity threat and self-regulation perspectives Nature, predictors, and outcomes of Nurses' trajectories of harmonious and obsessive passion Sowing the seeds of love: Cultivating perceptions of culture of companionate love through listening and its effects on organizational outcomes Leading while playing: How leader fun pursuit affects leadership perceptions and evaluations Time after time: The influence of perceived coworker overtime, affect and workaholism on daily withdrawal responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1