{"title":"Futures of Outcome‐Based Contracts for industrial equipment: A Disaggregative Delphi study","authors":"Olli Kuismanen , Hannu Kärkkäinen , Karan Menon","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the dynamic landscape of Outcome-Based Contracts (OBCs) within industrial equipment and investigates how external changes influence OBC feasibility. Employing Disaggregate Delphi involving panels of experts from industry and academia, the research uncovers critical insights of the relationship between OBCs and external changes. The analysis reveals that external changes can significantly impact the feasibility and profitability of OBCs for the supplier. These changes, having direct and indirect impacts, sometimes cascading through chains of events, necessitate proactive management strategies. The study underlines the role of context, in business environment, business model configuration, and product characteristics, in influencing OBC susceptibility to changes. Furthermore, it highlights that parties can inadvertently trigger impacts in response to external change. This research contributes to business model literature by shedding light on the multifaceted impacts of external changes on OBCs. It expands the understanding of how changes can have both positive and negative effects, emphasizing the importance of dynamic business model and contract frameworks. Additionally, the study underscores futures thinking and the significance of proactivity in navigating the evolving landscape of OBCs within industrial equipment OBCs as well as identifies uncertainty as one of the central value propositions of OBCs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 103477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores the dynamic landscape of Outcome-Based Contracts (OBCs) within industrial equipment and investigates how external changes influence OBC feasibility. Employing Disaggregate Delphi involving panels of experts from industry and academia, the research uncovers critical insights of the relationship between OBCs and external changes. The analysis reveals that external changes can significantly impact the feasibility and profitability of OBCs for the supplier. These changes, having direct and indirect impacts, sometimes cascading through chains of events, necessitate proactive management strategies. The study underlines the role of context, in business environment, business model configuration, and product characteristics, in influencing OBC susceptibility to changes. Furthermore, it highlights that parties can inadvertently trigger impacts in response to external change. This research contributes to business model literature by shedding light on the multifaceted impacts of external changes on OBCs. It expands the understanding of how changes can have both positive and negative effects, emphasizing the importance of dynamic business model and contract frameworks. Additionally, the study underscores futures thinking and the significance of proactivity in navigating the evolving landscape of OBCs within industrial equipment OBCs as well as identifies uncertainty as one of the central value propositions of OBCs.
期刊介绍:
Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures