Analysis of patient referrals from primary care to ophthalmology. The role of the optometrist

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Optometry Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2024.100521
Rafael Carrasco Solís , María Rosario Rodríguez Griñolo , Beatríz Ponte Zúñiga , Beatriz Mataix Albert , María Leticia LLedó de Villar , Rocío Martínez de Pablos , Enrique Rodríguez de la Rúa Franch
{"title":"Analysis of patient referrals from primary care to ophthalmology. The role of the optometrist","authors":"Rafael Carrasco Solís ,&nbsp;María Rosario Rodríguez Griñolo ,&nbsp;Beatríz Ponte Zúñiga ,&nbsp;Beatriz Mataix Albert ,&nbsp;María Leticia LLedó de Villar ,&nbsp;Rocío Martínez de Pablos ,&nbsp;Enrique Rodríguez de la Rúa Franch","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2024.100521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The aim of this study was to characterize the quality of primary care referrals of patients to ophthalmology at the Virgen Macarena Hospital in Seville. This will enable us to optimize ophthalmologic resources and to evaluate the role of the optometrist in improving referrals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cross-sectional review of 220 ophthalmology consultations referred from primary care to the hospital from March to May 2022.</div><div>The following data were extracted: age, sex, reason for consultation, diagnosis, priority level, whether it was an initial consultation or a follow-up visit, whether there was a secondary referral and whether the referral was appropriate. Excel (version 2312) was used for the data analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The age range of the patients was from 3 years to 91 years. The patients were 41.8 % male and 58.2 % female. The conditions found were grouped as follows: cataracts (27.27 %), refractive errors (20.9 %), anterior segment disease (18.8 %), posterior segment disease (14.07 %), normal examination (18.63 %) and others (0.9 %). The most common reason for consultation was blurred vision or loss of vision (43.63 %). In total, 41.36 % of the consultations were considered inappropriate. The age group requiring the highest number of consultations was over 65 years (38.64 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>With 41.36 percent of referrals deemed unnecessary, it is clear that referrals can be improved. This would reduce strain on the ophthalmology service and improve patient care. The importance of the optometrist in primary care is demonstrated by the fact that 20.9 % of the diagnoses were refractive errors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 4","pages":"Article 100521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429624000098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to characterize the quality of primary care referrals of patients to ophthalmology at the Virgen Macarena Hospital in Seville. This will enable us to optimize ophthalmologic resources and to evaluate the role of the optometrist in improving referrals.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional review of 220 ophthalmology consultations referred from primary care to the hospital from March to May 2022.
The following data were extracted: age, sex, reason for consultation, diagnosis, priority level, whether it was an initial consultation or a follow-up visit, whether there was a secondary referral and whether the referral was appropriate. Excel (version 2312) was used for the data analysis.

Results

The age range of the patients was from 3 years to 91 years. The patients were 41.8 % male and 58.2 % female. The conditions found were grouped as follows: cataracts (27.27 %), refractive errors (20.9 %), anterior segment disease (18.8 %), posterior segment disease (14.07 %), normal examination (18.63 %) and others (0.9 %). The most common reason for consultation was blurred vision or loss of vision (43.63 %). In total, 41.36 % of the consultations were considered inappropriate. The age group requiring the highest number of consultations was over 65 years (38.64 %).

Conclusions

With 41.36 percent of referrals deemed unnecessary, it is clear that referrals can be improved. This would reduce strain on the ophthalmology service and improve patient care. The importance of the optometrist in primary care is demonstrated by the fact that 20.9 % of the diagnoses were refractive errors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析从初级保健到眼科的病人转诊情况。验光师的作用
目的 本研究旨在了解塞维利亚 Virgen Macarena 医院眼科转诊患者的初级保健质量。我们提取了以下数据:年龄、性别、就诊原因、诊断、优先级别、是初诊还是复诊、是否有二次转诊以及转诊是否适当。数据分析使用 Excel(2312 版)。男性占 41.8%,女性占 58.2%。发现的疾病分为以下几类:白内障(27.27%)、屈光不正(20.9%)、前节疾病(18.8%)、后节疾病(14.07%)、正常检查(18.63%)和其他(0.9%)。最常见的就诊原因是视力模糊或视力下降(43.63%)。总共有 41.36% 的咨询被认为是不适当的。需要就诊人数最多的年龄组是 65 岁以上(38.64%)。这将减轻眼科服务的压力,改善对患者的护理。20.9%的诊断结果为屈光不正,这说明了验光师在初级保健中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Blue light stimulation of the optic nerve head reduces melatonin levels in rabbit posterior segment Effect of a vergence-accommodation conflict induced during a 30-minute Virtual Reality game on vergence-accommodation parameters and related symptoms Visual performance of a new trifocal intraocular lens design evaluated with a clinical adaptative optics visual simulator Analysis of patient referrals from primary care to ophthalmology. The role of the optometrist Corneal higher-order aberrations in different types of irregular cornea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1