Examination of the effect of different techniques (demonstration, telesimulation and game-based training) in teaching the management of shoulder dystocia: A randomized controlled trial

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101611
Ilknur M. Gönenç PhD , Menekşe Nazlı Aker PhD , Yeşim Çetinkaya Şen PhD
{"title":"Examination of the effect of different techniques (demonstration, telesimulation and game-based training) in teaching the management of shoulder dystocia: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Ilknur M. Gönenç PhD ,&nbsp;Menekşe Nazlı Aker PhD ,&nbsp;Yeşim Çetinkaya Şen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study evaluated the effect of demonstration, telesimulation and game-based training in teaching SD management for midwifery students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This randomized controlled trial was completed with 123 participants. To collect data, the ‘Introductory Information Form’, ‘Self-efficacy Visual Analog Scale (VAS)’, ‘Shoulder Dystocia Skill Checklist’, and ‘Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) were used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After the training, mean VAS scores of self-efficacy in diagnosing and intervening SD were higher in the telesimulation and demonstration groups, and mean VAS scores of self-efficacy in evaluating the postpartum mother and infant were higher in all intervention groups than in the control group (<em>p</em> &lt; .001). There is a difference between the control group and all intervention groups in terms of total skill score in SD management (<em>p</em> &lt; .001). Demonstration group's mean total score of MMS of students is higher than kahoot and control groups (<em>p</em> &lt; .005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It was seen that all three methods were more effective than theoretical training in gaining SD management skills, but telesimulation was more effective than other methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101611"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924001038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study evaluated the effect of demonstration, telesimulation and game-based training in teaching SD management for midwifery students.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial was completed with 123 participants. To collect data, the ‘Introductory Information Form’, ‘Self-efficacy Visual Analog Scale (VAS)’, ‘Shoulder Dystocia Skill Checklist’, and ‘Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) were used.

Results

After the training, mean VAS scores of self-efficacy in diagnosing and intervening SD were higher in the telesimulation and demonstration groups, and mean VAS scores of self-efficacy in evaluating the postpartum mother and infant were higher in all intervention groups than in the control group (p < .001). There is a difference between the control group and all intervention groups in terms of total skill score in SD management (p < .001). Demonstration group's mean total score of MMS of students is higher than kahoot and control groups (p < .005).

Conclusion

It was seen that all three methods were more effective than theoretical training in gaining SD management skills, but telesimulation was more effective than other methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究不同技术(示范、远程模拟和游戏式培训)在肩难产处理教学中的效果:随机对照试验
背景本研究评估了示范、远程模拟和基于游戏的培训对助产士学生SD管理教学的效果。方法本随机对照试验共有123人参加。结果培训后,远程模拟组和示范组在诊断和干预 SD 方面的自我效能 VAS 平均得分高于对照组,所有干预组在评估产后母亲和婴儿方面的自我效能 VAS 平均得分高于对照组(p < .001)。对照组与所有干预组在 SD 管理技能总分上存在差异(p <.001)。结论 在获得自毁行为管理技能方面,三种方法都比理论培训更有效,但远程模拟比其他方法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
期刊最新文献
Simulation training in airway fire safety for certified registered nurse anesthetists Immersive and non-immersive virtual reality: A quasi-experimental study in undergraduate nursing education Using virtual simulation to enhance interprofessional training: An application of the Zero Overdose safety planning tool Effects of child abuse simulation education using a forensic nursing approach: A randomized controlled study Promoting behavioral health patient safety using standardized patient simulation: Room search competency program for non-psychiatric inpatient medical unit nursing staff
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1