Less is more: Streamlining management of isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in the modified brain injury guidelines

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115973
Brandon A. Bellen , Janet S. Lee , Emily Johnson , Nathan Schmoekel , Robert McIntyre Jr. , Michael Cripps , John McVicker , Thomas Schroeppel
{"title":"Less is more: Streamlining management of isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in the modified brain injury guidelines","authors":"Brandon A. Bellen ,&nbsp;Janet S. Lee ,&nbsp;Emily Johnson ,&nbsp;Nathan Schmoekel ,&nbsp;Robert McIntyre Jr. ,&nbsp;Michael Cripps ,&nbsp;John McVicker ,&nbsp;Thomas Schroeppel","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (iTSAH) are managed according to the modified Brain Injury Guidelines (mBIG) class. The current study aimed to describe patients with iTSAH and analyze their clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed on trauma patients with iTSAH. Exclusion criteria were Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ​&lt; ​13 and pre-injury antiplatelet/anticoagulant use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>276 patients were identified over the 8-year study period. The median number of head CT scans was 2. Neurosurgery consultation was obtained in 80.4 ​% of patients. A total of 19 (8.6 ​%) patients had radiographic progression. Six (2.2 ​%) patients had neurologic deterioration. No patients required operative intervention or readmission. No deaths were related to iTSAH.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There were no patients with iTSAH that required neurosurgical consultation despite a subset of patients having radiographic or neurologic progression. These patients may not require repeat head CT scan or neurosurgical consult, necessitating a change of SAH definitions in the mBIG.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 115973"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024005257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (iTSAH) are managed according to the modified Brain Injury Guidelines (mBIG) class. The current study aimed to describe patients with iTSAH and analyze their clinical outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on trauma patients with iTSAH. Exclusion criteria were Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ​< ​13 and pre-injury antiplatelet/anticoagulant use.

Results

276 patients were identified over the 8-year study period. The median number of head CT scans was 2. Neurosurgery consultation was obtained in 80.4 ​% of patients. A total of 19 (8.6 ​%) patients had radiographic progression. Six (2.2 ​%) patients had neurologic deterioration. No patients required operative intervention or readmission. No deaths were related to iTSAH.

Conclusions

There were no patients with iTSAH that required neurosurgical consultation despite a subset of patients having radiographic or neurologic progression. These patients may not require repeat head CT scan or neurosurgical consult, necessitating a change of SAH definitions in the mBIG.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
少即是多:在修改后的脑损伤指南中简化对孤立性创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血的管理
背景孤立性外伤性蛛网膜下腔出血(iTSAH)患者按照改良脑损伤指南(mBIG)分级管理。本研究旨在描述 iTSAH 患者的情况并分析其临床结果。排除标准为格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)< 13和受伤前使用抗血小板/抗凝剂。80.4%的患者接受了神经外科会诊。共有 19 例(8.6%)患者出现放射学进展。6名患者(2.2%)出现神经功能恶化。没有患者需要手术治疗或再次入院。结论尽管部分 iTSAH 患者的影像学或神经系统病情有所进展,但没有患者需要神经外科会诊。这些患者可能不需要重复头部 CT 扫描或神经外科会诊,因此有必要改变 mBIG 中的 SAH 定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents (5pgs) Emeritus Editorial Board The role of combining interim and final analysis by using endoscopic and radiologic methods in total neoadjuvant treatment Roses & Thorns of academic surgery: The journey of Dr. Benedict Nwomeh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1