Measuring differences in social touch: Development and validation of the short Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire (TEAQ-s)

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112890
Yvonne Friedrich , Sophia Faresse , Celine Henning , Paula D. Trotter , Rochelle Ackerley , Ilona Croy
{"title":"Measuring differences in social touch: Development and validation of the short Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire (TEAQ-s)","authors":"Yvonne Friedrich ,&nbsp;Sophia Faresse ,&nbsp;Celine Henning ,&nbsp;Paula D. Trotter ,&nbsp;Rochelle Ackerley ,&nbsp;Ilona Croy","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interpersonal touch is an essential part of human social life, impacting emotional and physical well-being. Variations in touch behavior and perception can be assessed by the <em>Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire (TEAQ)</em>. Although comprehensive, the TEAQ appears lengthy with 57 items, limiting its usability for large surveys. Therefore, we developed a refined and shortened version of 16 items, tested in Germany and France. This manuscript presents three studies. In the first, we created the TEAQ-s (<em>n</em> = 313). In the second and third, we validated the TEAQ-s in German (<em>n</em> = 383) and French (<em>n</em> = 327), respectively. The resulting TEAQ-s showed strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha: 0.86 to 0.87; test-retest correlation: <em>r</em> = 0.85) and validity consistent with the original version. Analyses also revealed that being in a relationship, relationship satisfaction, mental health, and body appreciation were positively related to touch experiences and attitudes. A four-factor structure (4 items per scale) was confirmed through factor analysis. Final subscales are <em>attitude to friendly touch</em>, <em>current intimate touch</em>, <em>childhood touch</em>, and <em>attitude to intimate touch</em>. We hope that the TEAQ-s serves as a valuable tool for researchers in the field of touch and beyond, offering well-founded items in an efficient format.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 112890"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpersonal touch is an essential part of human social life, impacting emotional and physical well-being. Variations in touch behavior and perception can be assessed by the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire (TEAQ). Although comprehensive, the TEAQ appears lengthy with 57 items, limiting its usability for large surveys. Therefore, we developed a refined and shortened version of 16 items, tested in Germany and France. This manuscript presents three studies. In the first, we created the TEAQ-s (n = 313). In the second and third, we validated the TEAQ-s in German (n = 383) and French (n = 327), respectively. The resulting TEAQ-s showed strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha: 0.86 to 0.87; test-retest correlation: r = 0.85) and validity consistent with the original version. Analyses also revealed that being in a relationship, relationship satisfaction, mental health, and body appreciation were positively related to touch experiences and attitudes. A four-factor structure (4 items per scale) was confirmed through factor analysis. Final subscales are attitude to friendly touch, current intimate touch, childhood touch, and attitude to intimate touch. We hope that the TEAQ-s serves as a valuable tool for researchers in the field of touch and beyond, offering well-founded items in an efficient format.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量社会接触的差异:简短触摸体验与态度问卷(TEAQ-s)的开发与验证
人与人之间的接触是人类社会生活的重要组成部分,对情感和身体健康都有影响。触摸行为和感知的变化可以通过触摸体验和态度问卷(TEAQ)进行评估。虽然 TEAQ 内容全面,但它有 57 个项目,显得冗长,限制了它在大型调查中的可用性。因此,我们开发了一个由 16 个项目组成的精练简短版本,并在德国和法国进行了测试。本手稿介绍了三项研究。在第一项研究中,我们编制了 TEAQ-s(n = 313)。在第二和第三项研究中,我们分别用德语(n = 383)和法语(n = 327)验证了 TEAQ-s。结果显示,TEAQ-s 具有很高的信度(克朗巴赫α:0.86 至 0.87;测试-再测试相关性:r = 0.85)和效度,与原始版本一致。分析还显示,恋爱关系、恋爱关系满意度、心理健康和身体欣赏与触摸体验和态度呈正相关。通过因子分析,确认了四因子结构(每个量表 4 个项目)。最终的子量表包括对友好触摸的态度、当前亲密触摸的态度、童年触摸的态度和对亲密触摸的态度。我们希望 TEAQ-s 能以高效的形式提供有理有据的项目,成为触觉及其他领域研究人员的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Individual differences in perceiving disinformation sharing as opinion leadership: Effects of dark triad traits, need for uniqueness, and green identity Independence of intellect and ego relates to increased subjective well-being and decreased psychopathology Implicit theories of men's preferred humor styles as a function of facial masculinity Socio-emotional stress regulation in infants with visual impairment: Exploring the role of maternal vocal and tactile behavior Exploring the associations among relationship-related attitudes, affection deprivation, and faking orgasm among heterosexual women in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1