Unravelling human-centric tensions towards Industry 5.0: Literature review, resolution strategies and research agenda

Diego A. de J. Pacheco, Bartosz Iwaszczenko
{"title":"Unravelling human-centric tensions towards Industry 5.0: Literature review, resolution strategies and research agenda","authors":"Diego A. de J. Pacheco,&nbsp;Bartosz Iwaszczenko","doi":"10.1016/j.digbus.2024.100090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, heightened attention has been directed towards the emerging Industry 5.0 (I5.0) paradigm, advocating intelligent collaboration between human workers and machines to enhance efficiency, productivity, customization, and product quality in manufacturing. However, despite its potential to revolutionize current industrial practices, the I5.0 transition also imposes several known and unknown tensions that require attention for effective adaptation. This study aims to investigate the main human-centric tensions and resolution strategies in manufacturing arising in the transition towards I5.0. The research methodology developed a three-step approach. First, the study conducted a literature review of academic papers to gain insights into the human-centricity challenges arising from the adoption of I5.0. Second, based on these findings, we develop a theoretical framework that organizes these central human-centricity tensions in the manufacturing context, resulting in 20 tensions identified. The identified tensions are categorized into learning, organizing, belonging, performing and their interrelationships, according to the paradox theory. Third, based on the literature findings, the study develops a novel framework with resolution strategies to address these tensions. The findings show that salient tensions emerge mainly in dimensions such as automation, well-being, safety, education, and value creation. The study provides valuable insights for manufacturing companies in the preparation or I5.0 realization, emphasizing the pivotal roles of shop floor workers in the interaction with machines. The study provides valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners, representing a pioneering effort to understand the tensions and resolution strategies of I5.0 within the manufacturing environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100376,"journal":{"name":"Digital Business","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100090"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666954424000188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, heightened attention has been directed towards the emerging Industry 5.0 (I5.0) paradigm, advocating intelligent collaboration between human workers and machines to enhance efficiency, productivity, customization, and product quality in manufacturing. However, despite its potential to revolutionize current industrial practices, the I5.0 transition also imposes several known and unknown tensions that require attention for effective adaptation. This study aims to investigate the main human-centric tensions and resolution strategies in manufacturing arising in the transition towards I5.0. The research methodology developed a three-step approach. First, the study conducted a literature review of academic papers to gain insights into the human-centricity challenges arising from the adoption of I5.0. Second, based on these findings, we develop a theoretical framework that organizes these central human-centricity tensions in the manufacturing context, resulting in 20 tensions identified. The identified tensions are categorized into learning, organizing, belonging, performing and their interrelationships, according to the paradox theory. Third, based on the literature findings, the study develops a novel framework with resolution strategies to address these tensions. The findings show that salient tensions emerge mainly in dimensions such as automation, well-being, safety, education, and value creation. The study provides valuable insights for manufacturing companies in the preparation or I5.0 realization, emphasizing the pivotal roles of shop floor workers in the interaction with machines. The study provides valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners, representing a pioneering effort to understand the tensions and resolution strategies of I5.0 within the manufacturing environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解开工业 5.0 以人为本的矛盾:文献综述、解决策略和研究议程
近年来,人们越来越关注新兴的工业 5.0(I5.0)范式,该范式倡导人类工人与机器之间的智能协作,以提高制造业的效率、生产力、定制化程度和产品质量。然而,尽管 I5.0 有可能彻底改变当前的工业实践,但它也带来了一些已知和未知的矛盾,需要加以关注才能有效适应。本研究旨在探讨制造业在向 I5.0 转型过程中出现的以人为本的主要矛盾和解决策略。研究方法分为三个步骤。首先,本研究对学术论文进行了文献综述,以深入了解在采用 I5.0 过程中出现的以人为本的挑战。其次,基于这些发现,我们制定了一个理论框架,将制造业背景下这些以人为本的核心矛盾组织起来,最终确定了 20 个矛盾。根据悖论理论,所识别的紧张关系分为学习、组织、归属、执行及其相互关系。第三,根据文献研究结果,本研究制定了一个新的框架,其中包含解决这些紧张关系的策略。研究结果表明,突出的紧张关系主要出现在自动化、福利、安全、教育和价值创造等方面。本研究为制造企业准备或实现 I5.0 提供了宝贵的见解,强调了车间工人在与机器互动中的关键作用。这项研究为研究人员和从业人员提供了宝贵的见解,是了解制造环境中 I5.0 的紧张关系和解决策略的开创性努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building digital platform ecosystems: A synthetization of fundamental design topics from a literature review Realising value from big data analytics: The process of affordance actualisation Sequential film marketing in China: The study of social platforms and their impacts Understanding determinants of digital transformation and digitizing management functions in incumbent SMEs Reinvestment intentions in cryptocurrency: Examining the dynamics of risks and investor risk tolerance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1