Development and validation of domain specific school diversity model scales among pupils and teachers: A multilevel approach

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101378
{"title":"Development and validation of domain specific school diversity model scales among pupils and teachers: A multilevel approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study consisted of the development and validation of a novel multi-rater Domain-Specific School Diversity Model scale (DS-SDM) that captures pupils' and teachers' perceptions of the extent to which their school adopts assimilationist, colorblind, and pluralist approaches to the domains of (a) languages, (b) religions, (c) the curriculum, and (d) students' identities. Using data collected from 3073 students ages 10–12 years and 816 teachers from 59 primary schools in Flanders, Belgium, we performed multilevel exploratory factor analyses and confirmatory factor analyses to evaluate these novel scales. We identified a total of nine measurement scales among students and seven among teachers that were reliable (internal consistency range = 0.63–0.86) and invariant across different subgroups of pupils (i.e., ethnic minoritized versus majority pupils). Interestingly, we found that perceptions by pupils and teachers within the same school were often notably different, especially in the domains of curriculum and identities. Overall, this study offers novel tools to capture perceptions of school diversity models among students and teachers in more nuanced and domain-specific ways. As such, it paves the way for future school psychological or educational studies and interventions targeting domain-specific diversity practices that are most strongly related to ethnic minoritized and majority students' well-being and school achievement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524000980","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study consisted of the development and validation of a novel multi-rater Domain-Specific School Diversity Model scale (DS-SDM) that captures pupils' and teachers' perceptions of the extent to which their school adopts assimilationist, colorblind, and pluralist approaches to the domains of (a) languages, (b) religions, (c) the curriculum, and (d) students' identities. Using data collected from 3073 students ages 10–12 years and 816 teachers from 59 primary schools in Flanders, Belgium, we performed multilevel exploratory factor analyses and confirmatory factor analyses to evaluate these novel scales. We identified a total of nine measurement scales among students and seven among teachers that were reliable (internal consistency range = 0.63–0.86) and invariant across different subgroups of pupils (i.e., ethnic minoritized versus majority pupils). Interestingly, we found that perceptions by pupils and teachers within the same school were often notably different, especially in the domains of curriculum and identities. Overall, this study offers novel tools to capture perceptions of school diversity models among students and teachers in more nuanced and domain-specific ways. As such, it paves the way for future school psychological or educational studies and interventions targeting domain-specific diversity practices that are most strongly related to ethnic minoritized and majority students' well-being and school achievement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在学生和教师中开发和验证特定领域的学校多样性模型量表:多层次方法
本研究包括开发和验证一种新颖的多评分者特定领域学校多样性模型量表(DS-SDM),该量表可捕捉学生和教师对其学校在(a)语言、(b)宗教、(c)课程和(d)学生身份等领域采用同化、色盲和多元化方法的程度的看法。我们利用从比利时佛兰德斯地区 59 所小学的 3073 名 10-12 岁学生和 816 名教师那里收集到的数据,进行了多层次探索性因子分析和确认性因子分析,以评估这些新量表。我们在学生和教师中分别确定了 9 个和 7 个可靠的测量量表(内部一致性范围 = 0.63-0.86),并且在不同的小学生亚群(即少数民族小学生和多数民族小学生)中保持不变。有趣的是,我们发现同一所学校的学生和教师的认知往往存在明显差异,尤其是在课程和身份认同方面。总之,这项研究提供了新颖的工具,以更加细致入微和针对特定领域的方式来捕捉学生和教师对学校多元化模式的看法。因此,本研究为未来的学校心理或教育研究以及针对特定领域多样性实践的干预措施铺平了道路,这些领域与少数族裔学生和多数族裔学生的福祉和学业成绩关系最为密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of domain specific school diversity model scales among pupils and teachers: A multilevel approach School-based consultation and coaching for promoting teachers’ generalized outcomes: A meta-analysis Bayesian approach to piecewise growth mixture modeling: Issues and applications in school psychology Concentration toward the mode: Estimating changes in the shape of a distribution of student data Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1