Cardiovascular procedures in ambulatory cardiac procedures: really?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Current Opinion in Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001435
Victor R Davila, Samiya Saklayen, Jonathan Tang
{"title":"Cardiovascular procedures in ambulatory cardiac procedures: really?","authors":"Victor R Davila, Samiya Saklayen, Jonathan Tang","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To evaluate the current trends, safety, and feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) in ambulatory cardiac procedures, with a focus on percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). This review also discusses the impact of technological advancements and explores future directions for expanding the scope of SDD in more complex cardiac procedures.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have demonstrated that SDD after PCI is both well tolerated and effective for appropriately selected patients, with outcomes comparable with those of patients who remain hospitalized overnight. Advancements in PCI technology, including improved stent designs, smaller sheath sizes, and the adoption of the transradial approach, have significantly enhanced the feasibility of SDD. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways, adapted for ambulatory settings, further improve patient safety, particularly as more complex procedures are attempted. However, challenges remain in determining SDD eligibility, particularly in settings with limited emergency care capabilities.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>SDD is a viable and cost-effective option for low-risk patients undergoing PCI and other ambulatory cardiac procedures. The successful implementation of SDD requires careful patient selection, adherence to standardized protocols, and vigilant postprocedural monitoring. Future research should focus on refining patient selection tools, expanding the scope of SDD to include more complex procedures, and enhancing postdischarge monitoring through advanced technologies. Multidisciplinary collaboration and ongoing education are essential to support the well tolerated and effective adoption of SDD in ambulatory cardiac care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"638-643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: To evaluate the current trends, safety, and feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) in ambulatory cardiac procedures, with a focus on percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). This review also discusses the impact of technological advancements and explores future directions for expanding the scope of SDD in more complex cardiac procedures.

Recent findings: Recent studies have demonstrated that SDD after PCI is both well tolerated and effective for appropriately selected patients, with outcomes comparable with those of patients who remain hospitalized overnight. Advancements in PCI technology, including improved stent designs, smaller sheath sizes, and the adoption of the transradial approach, have significantly enhanced the feasibility of SDD. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways, adapted for ambulatory settings, further improve patient safety, particularly as more complex procedures are attempted. However, challenges remain in determining SDD eligibility, particularly in settings with limited emergency care capabilities.

Summary: SDD is a viable and cost-effective option for low-risk patients undergoing PCI and other ambulatory cardiac procedures. The successful implementation of SDD requires careful patient selection, adherence to standardized protocols, and vigilant postprocedural monitoring. Future research should focus on refining patient selection tools, expanding the scope of SDD to include more complex procedures, and enhancing postdischarge monitoring through advanced technologies. Multidisciplinary collaboration and ongoing education are essential to support the well tolerated and effective adoption of SDD in ambulatory cardiac care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊心脏手术中的心血管程序:真的吗?
审查目的:评估非住院心脏手术中当日出院(SDD)的当前趋势、安全性和可行性,重点关注经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。本综述还讨论了技术进步的影响,并探讨了在更复杂的心脏手术中扩大 SDD 范围的未来方向:最近的研究表明,PCI 术后 SDD 对于经过适当选择的患者来说,耐受性和有效性都很好,其疗效与住院过夜的患者不相上下。PCI 技术的进步,包括支架设计的改进、鞘管尺寸的缩小以及经桡动脉方法的采用,都大大提高了 SDD 的可行性。适用于非卧床环境的术后恢复强化路径(ERAS)进一步提高了患者的安全性,尤其是在尝试更复杂的手术时。总结:对于接受 PCI 和其他非卧床心脏手术的低风险患者来说,SDD 是一种可行且具有成本效益的选择。要成功实施 SDD,必须谨慎选择患者、遵守标准化方案并在术后进行严密监测。未来的研究应侧重于完善患者选择工具、扩大 SDD 的范围以包括更复杂的手术,以及通过先进技术加强出院后监测。多学科合作和持续教育对于支持在非住院心脏护理中采用耐受性良好且有效的 SDD 至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning: implications and applications for ambulatory anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia in ambulatory patients. Mitigating and preventing perioperative opioid-related harm. More than pacemakers and defibrillators: perioperative management of implantable devices for patient safety. Safety amid the scalpels: creating psychological safety in the operating room.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1