The Curious Case of "Men in Nursing" as a Diversity Issue: A Critical Reading of the Literature.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Advances in Nursing Science Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1097/ANS.0000000000000540
Stephen M Padgett
{"title":"The Curious Case of \"Men in Nursing\" as a Diversity Issue: A Critical Reading of the Literature.","authors":"Stephen M Padgett","doi":"10.1097/ANS.0000000000000540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years the situation of \"men in nursing\" has been framed as a diversity issue, analogous to efforts to increase the proportion of women in male-dominated occupations, and to racial diversity in health professions. Advocates claim that nursing education is dominated by a \"feminine\" perspective, resulting in unhappy male students and marginalized male faculty. This is puzzling, as a close reading of the literature finds little support for these claims; and a persistent discounting of male advantages. Portraying men in nursing as victims distorts the nature of systemic oppression, and distracts us from more serious diversity struggles.</p>","PeriodicalId":50857,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Nursing Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000540","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years the situation of "men in nursing" has been framed as a diversity issue, analogous to efforts to increase the proportion of women in male-dominated occupations, and to racial diversity in health professions. Advocates claim that nursing education is dominated by a "feminine" perspective, resulting in unhappy male students and marginalized male faculty. This is puzzling, as a close reading of the literature finds little support for these claims; and a persistent discounting of male advantages. Portraying men in nursing as victims distorts the nature of systemic oppression, and distracts us from more serious diversity struggles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将 "男性从事护理工作 "作为多样性问题的奇特案例:文献批判性解读》。
近年来,"男性从事护理工作 "的情况被视为一个多元化问题,类似于努力提高女性在男性占主导地位的职业中的比例,以及卫生专业中的种族多元化问题。倡导者声称,护理教育以 "女性 "视角为主导,导致男学生不开心,男教师被边缘化。这一点令人费解,因为仔细阅读文献后发现,这些说法几乎没有得到支持;而且男性的优势一直被低估。将护理专业中的男性描绘成受害者扭曲了系统性压迫的本质,分散了我们对更严重的多样性斗争的注意力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
93
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Consistently ranked as one of the most-read and most assigned journals by faculties of graduate programs in nursing, Advances in Nursing Science (ANS) is intellectually challenging, innovative and progressive, and features articles from a wide range of scholarly traditions. The journal particularly encourages works that speak to the need for global sustainability and that take an intersectional approach, recognizing class, color, sexual and gender identity, and other dimensions of human experience related to health. Articles in ANS are peer-reviewed and chosen for their pioneering perspectives and for their significance in contributing the evolution of the discipline of nursing.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Research Trends on Digital Health in Nursing Science in Korea: A Topic Modeling Approach. Nursing Professional Identity: A Critical Review of the Concept Amidst COVID-19. Bibliometric Analysis (2000-2024) of Research on Artificial Intelligence in Nursing. Capturing Intersections of Discrimination: Quantitative Analysis of Nursing Students' Experiences. Empowering Nurses Through Data Literacy and Data Science Literacy: Insights From a State-of-the-Art Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1