Effectiveness of spiritual and religious interventions in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 4.3 3区材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1037/hea0001415

Havva Sert, Merve Gulbahar Eren, Aylin Meşe Tunç, Kübra Üçgül, Ayşe Çevirme

{"title":"Effectiveness of spiritual and religious interventions in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Havva Sert, Merve Gulbahar Eren, Aylin Meşe Tunç, Kübra Üçgül, Ayşe Çevirme","doi":"10.1037/hea0001415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to combine the physiological, psychological, and spiritual health effects of spiritual and religious interventions on cardiovascular disease patients.Method: Studies from January 1999 to December 2022 were sourced from ScienceDirect, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature databases. This meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 4. Heterogeneity was assessed using 95% confidence intervals (CIs), p values, and fixed or random-effects models.Results: This systematic review included 15 studies with 2,047 participants, while the meta-analysis focused on 12 studies. Spiritual and religion-based interventions notably reduced participants' heart rate (g = -0.287, 95% CI = [-0.552, -0.021]), anxiety (g = -1.081, 95% CI [-1.364, -0.831]), and depression (g = -1.346, 95% CI [-1.965, -0.726]). Moreover, these interventions significantly enhanced spiritual well-being (g = 0.692, 95% CI [0.459, 0.926]) and hope levels (g = 1.152, 95% CI [0.347, 1.956]) compared to control groups.Conclusion: This meta-analysis flashes on utilizing spiritual and religion-based interventions for nurses, chaplains, psychologists, social workers, and other professionals who might lead patient care to enhance health outcomes for cardiac patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to combine the physiological, psychological, and spiritual health effects of spiritual and religious interventions on cardiovascular disease patients.

Method: Studies from January 1999 to December 2022 were sourced from ScienceDirect, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature databases. This meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 4. Heterogeneity was assessed using 95% confidence intervals (CIs), p values, and fixed or random-effects models.

Results: This systematic review included 15 studies with 2,047 participants, while the meta-analysis focused on 12 studies. Spiritual and religion-based interventions notably reduced participants' heart rate (g = -0.287, 95% CI = [-0.552, -0.021]), anxiety (g = -1.081, 95% CI [-1.364, -0.831]), and depression (g = -1.346, 95% CI [-1.965, -0.726]). Moreover, these interventions significantly enhanced spiritual well-being (g = 0.692, 95% CI [0.459, 0.926]) and hope levels (g = 1.152, 95% CI [0.347, 1.956]) compared to control groups.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis flashes on utilizing spiritual and religion-based interventions for nurses, chaplains, psychologists, social workers, and other professionals who might lead patient care to enhance health outcomes for cardiac patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

对心血管疾病患者进行精神和宗教干预的有效性：随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

目的本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在将精神和宗教干预对心血管疾病患者的生理、心理和精神健康影响结合起来：方法：从ScienceDirect、PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane CENTRAL以及护理和联合健康文献累积索引数据库中获取1999年1月至2022年12月的研究。本荟萃分析遵循《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南。数据采用第 4 版综合荟萃分析法进行分析。使用 95% 置信区间 (CI)、P 值和固定或随机效应模型评估异质性：本系统综述包括 15 项研究，共有 2047 名参与者，而荟萃分析则侧重于 12 项研究。精神和宗教干预显著降低了参与者的心率（g = -0.287，95% CI = [-0.552，-0.021]）、焦虑（g =-1.081，95% CI [-1.364，-0.831]）和抑郁（g =-1.346，95% CI [-1.965，-0.726]）。此外，与对照组相比，这些干预措施大大提高了精神幸福感（g = 0.692，95% CI [0.459，0.926]）和希望水平（g = 1.152，95% CI [0.347，1.956]）：这项荟萃分析为护士、牧师、心理学家、社会工作者和其他可能领导患者护理的专业人员提供了利用精神和宗教干预措施提高心脏病患者健康状况的闪光点。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA，保留所有权利）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊