Prevalence, trends, and outcomes of same-day discharge following elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective observational cohort study using routinely collected health data.

Yingyan Chen, Ian Smith, Chiung-Jung Jo Wu, Laetitia Hattingh, Laurie Howes, Rohan Jayasinghe, Rohan Poulter, Atifur Rahman, Gregory Starmer, Yash Singbal, Raibhan Yadav, Andrea P Marshall
{"title":"Prevalence, trends, and outcomes of same-day discharge following elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective observational cohort study using routinely collected health data.","authors":"Yingyan Chen, Ian Smith, Chiung-Jung Jo Wu, Laetitia Hattingh, Laurie Howes, Rohan Jayasinghe, Rohan Poulter, Atifur Rahman, Gregory Starmer, Yash Singbal, Raibhan Yadav, Andrea P Marshall","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvae125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify the prevalence, trends, and outcomes of same-day discharge (SDD) following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among six public hospitals in Queensland, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A retrospective observational research design was used. A total of 4387 cases were obtained from the Queensland Cardiac Outcomes Registry and National Hospital Cost Data Collection. The two data sets were linked using identifiable data items. Patients were those who had elective PCI between December 2012 and December 2019 either discharged the same day of the procedure or the next day. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The overall SDD prevalence was 6.5%, with a trend increasing from 0.2% in 2013 to 9.0% in 2019. The prevalence varied at the individual hospital level. Two hospitals did not perform SDD during the study period. The remaining hospitals demonstrated variability in SDD prevalence, with the highest from one hospital being 28.2% in 2019. Almost all SDD patients experienced no complications during or following PCI within 24 h. Compared with next-day discharge, SDD reduced the length of stay by 18 h and conferred an average of $3695 cost-savings per patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was limited implementation of SDD in the six public hospitals contributing data to this study. Improvement in the SDD rate could result in better hospital resource utilization and reduce low-value care. Hence, strategies to implement and promote SDD are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":93997,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","volume":" ","pages":"104-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvae125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To identify the prevalence, trends, and outcomes of same-day discharge (SDD) following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among six public hospitals in Queensland, Australia.

Methods and results: A retrospective observational research design was used. A total of 4387 cases were obtained from the Queensland Cardiac Outcomes Registry and National Hospital Cost Data Collection. The two data sets were linked using identifiable data items. Patients were those who had elective PCI between December 2012 and December 2019 either discharged the same day of the procedure or the next day. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The overall SDD prevalence was 6.5%, with a trend increasing from 0.2% in 2013 to 9.0% in 2019. The prevalence varied at the individual hospital level. Two hospitals did not perform SDD during the study period. The remaining hospitals demonstrated variability in SDD prevalence, with the highest from one hospital being 28.2% in 2019. Almost all SDD patients experienced no complications during or following PCI within 24 h. Compared with next-day discharge, SDD reduced the length of stay by 18 h and conferred an average of $3695 cost-savings per patient.

Conclusion: There was limited implementation of SDD in the six public hospitals contributing data to this study. Improvement in the SDD rate could result in better hospital resource utilization and reduce low-value care. Hence, strategies to implement and promote SDD are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后当天出院的发生率、趋势和结果:一项利用常规收集的健康数据进行的回顾性观察队列研究。
目的:确定澳大利亚某州六家公立医院中择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后当天出院的发生率、趋势和结果:采用回顾性观察研究设计。共有 4387 个病例来自州心脏结果登记处和全国医院成本数据收集处。这两个数据集通过可识别的数据项进行链接。患者是指在2012年12月至2019年12月期间接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,他们要么在手术当天出院,要么在第二天出院。数据采用描述性和推论性统计方法进行分析。当天出院的总体流行率为 6.5%,呈上升趋势,从 2013 年的 0.2% 上升至 2019 年的 9.0%。各家医院的流行率不尽相同。有两家医院在研究期间未进行当日出院。其余医院的当日出院率存在差异,其中一家医院在 2019 年的当日出院率最高,为 28.2%。几乎所有当天出院的患者在 24 小时内经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间或之后都没有出现并发症。与次日出院相比,当日出院的患者住院时间缩短了18个小时,平均每位患者可节省3695美元的费用:结论:在为本研究提供数据的六家公立医院中,当日出院的实施情况有限。提高当日出院率可提高医院资源利用率,减少低价值护理。因此,实施和推广当日出院的策略是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From an all-out endurance test to the cardiology ward: my cardiac journey. Role of rapid 12-lead electrocardiogram in triage initiatives for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients self-presenting in emergency departments. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Optimizing cardiac rehabilitation: structuring dietary support for improved post myocardial infarction outcomes. The potential of home-based multicomponent exercise programmes in managing frailty in cardiac surgery recovery. Sex differences in secondary prevention needs and recommendations among patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1