Outcome of Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma with Second-line Chemotherapy Ifosfamide-Carboplatin-Etoposide with or without Rituximab.

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2024-10-01
S Haque, Z Z Chowdhury, T Bahar, S T Reshma, A K M Islam, M Ali, M M Rahman
{"title":"Outcome of Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma with Second-line Chemotherapy Ifosfamide-Carboplatin-Etoposide with or without Rituximab.","authors":"S Haque, Z Z Chowdhury, T Bahar, S T Reshma, A K M Islam, M Ali, M M Rahman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is difficult. The de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has better prognosis than the transformed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The response of CHOP or a similar regimen has an important role in determining response to salvage therapy, in relapse or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. Patients who are non-responder to initial treatment have a very poor chance of responding to therapy for relapse. This was a small scale observational study and was conducted from January 2017 to December 2020 in National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Bangladesh. A total of 34 patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were identified at hematology department in National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, 28 of them were treated with ICE chemotherapy and 6 with R-ICE chemotherapy as second line regimen. Overall response rate to 2nd line chemotherapy was 64.8%, with 32.4% (11 patients) complete remission and 32.4% (11 patients) partial remission. Median overall survival to second line regimen was 10 months, corresponding to a 4 year overall survival of 32.4% and a 4 year progression free survival was 17.6%. Patient with stable disease/progressive disease median overall survival was 7 months compared with 15 months for complete remission and 9 months for partial remission (p<0.001). Median overall survival was significantly better in patients with international prognostic index 0-2 compared in those with international prognostic index >2 (p=0.010). However improvement of salvage efficacy is an urgent need with new drugs. Further studies are necessary to determine whether this regimen will improve outcomes of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94148,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is difficult. The de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has better prognosis than the transformed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The response of CHOP or a similar regimen has an important role in determining response to salvage therapy, in relapse or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. Patients who are non-responder to initial treatment have a very poor chance of responding to therapy for relapse. This was a small scale observational study and was conducted from January 2017 to December 2020 in National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Bangladesh. A total of 34 patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were identified at hematology department in National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, 28 of them were treated with ICE chemotherapy and 6 with R-ICE chemotherapy as second line regimen. Overall response rate to 2nd line chemotherapy was 64.8%, with 32.4% (11 patients) complete remission and 32.4% (11 patients) partial remission. Median overall survival to second line regimen was 10 months, corresponding to a 4 year overall survival of 32.4% and a 4 year progression free survival was 17.6%. Patient with stable disease/progressive disease median overall survival was 7 months compared with 15 months for complete remission and 9 months for partial remission (p<0.001). Median overall survival was significantly better in patients with international prognostic index 0-2 compared in those with international prognostic index >2 (p=0.010). However improvement of salvage efficacy is an urgent need with new drugs. Further studies are necessary to determine whether this regimen will improve outcomes of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发性或难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤二线化疗伊福酰胺-卡铂-依托泊苷联合或不联合利妥昔单抗的疗效
复发或难治的弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤很难治疗。新发弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的预后优于转化的弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤。对于复发或难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者来说,CHOP 或类似方案的反应在决定对挽救疗法的反应方面起着重要作用。对初始治疗无反应的患者对复发治疗产生反应的几率很低。这是一项小规模观察研究,于 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月在孟加拉国国立癌症研究所和医院进行。国立癌症研究所和医院的血液科共发现了34名复发或难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,其中28人接受了ICE化疗,6人接受了R-ICE化疗作为二线方案。二线化疗的总反应率为 64.8%,其中 32.4%(11 名患者)完全缓解,32.4%(11 名患者)部分缓解。二线疗法的中位总生存期为10个月,4年总生存期为32.4%,4年无进展生存期为17.6%。疾病稳定/疾病进展患者的中位总生存期为7个月,而完全缓解患者的中位总生存期为15个月,部分缓解患者的中位总生存期为9个月(P2(P=0.010))。然而,利用新药提高挽救疗效是当务之急。有必要开展进一步研究,以确定该疗法是否能改善复发或难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Cross-Sectional Study of the Normative Data of the Side-To-Side Soleus Hoffmann Reflex from the Calf Muscle in Healthy Individuals in the Lying Down Position. A Rare Case of Partially Ossified Sacrospinous Ligament Causing Sciatic Nerve Compression. A Study of Short-term Breathing Exercises on Different Cardio-Respiratory Parameters. An Alternative Diagnostic Test rather than 24 hours Urinary Protein to Detect Massive Proteinuria in Nephrotic Syndrome in Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh. Association of Body Mass Index, Blood Pressure with Fasting Serum Glucose in Female with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1