Diagnosis of suspected pediatric distal forearm fractures with point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) by pediatric orthopedic surgeons after minimal training.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1186/s12880-024-01433-y
Josephine Edith Pohl, Philipp Schwerk, René Mauer, Gabriele Hahn, Ricardo Beck, Guido Fitze, Jurek Schultz
{"title":"Diagnosis of suspected pediatric distal forearm fractures with point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) by pediatric orthopedic surgeons after minimal training.","authors":"Josephine Edith Pohl, Philipp Schwerk, René Mauer, Gabriele Hahn, Ricardo Beck, Guido Fitze, Jurek Schultz","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01433-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies have advocated the use of ultrasound to diagnose distal forearm fractures in children. However, there is limited data on the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for distal forearm fractures when conducted by pediatric surgeons or trainees who manage orthopedic injuries in children. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for pediatric distal forearm fractures when conducted by pediatric surgeons and trainees after minimal training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This diagnostic study was conducted in a tertiary hospital emergency department in Germany. Participants were children and adolescents under 15 years of age who presented to the emergency department with an acute, suspected, isolated distal forearm fracture requiring imaging. Pediatric surgeons and trainees, after minimal training for sonographic fracture diagnosis, performed 6-view distal forearm POCUS on each participant prior to X-ray imaging. All data was retrospectively collected from the hospital's routine digital patient files. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS compared to X-ray as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February to June 2021, 146 children under 15 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 106 data sets were available for analysis. Regarding the presence of a fracture, X-ray and Wrist-POCUS showed the same result in 99.1%, with 83/106 (78.3%) fractures detected in both modalities and one suspected buckle fracture on POCUS not confirmed in the radiographs. Wrist-POCUS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI [0.956, 1]) and a specificity of 95.8% (95% CI [0.789, 0.999]) compared to radiographs. In 6 cases, there were minor differences regarding a concomitant ulnar buckle. The amount of prior ultrasound training had no influence on the accuracy of Wrist-POCUS for diagnosing distal forearm fractures. All fractures were reliably diagnosed even when captured POCUS images did not meet all quality criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric surgeons and trainees, after minimal training in POCUS, had excellent diagnostic accuracy for distal forearm fractures in children and adolescents using POCUS compared to X-ray.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01433-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several studies have advocated the use of ultrasound to diagnose distal forearm fractures in children. However, there is limited data on the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for distal forearm fractures when conducted by pediatric surgeons or trainees who manage orthopedic injuries in children. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for pediatric distal forearm fractures when conducted by pediatric surgeons and trainees after minimal training.

Methods: This diagnostic study was conducted in a tertiary hospital emergency department in Germany. Participants were children and adolescents under 15 years of age who presented to the emergency department with an acute, suspected, isolated distal forearm fracture requiring imaging. Pediatric surgeons and trainees, after minimal training for sonographic fracture diagnosis, performed 6-view distal forearm POCUS on each participant prior to X-ray imaging. All data was retrospectively collected from the hospital's routine digital patient files. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS compared to X-ray as the reference standard.

Results: From February to June 2021, 146 children under 15 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 106 data sets were available for analysis. Regarding the presence of a fracture, X-ray and Wrist-POCUS showed the same result in 99.1%, with 83/106 (78.3%) fractures detected in both modalities and one suspected buckle fracture on POCUS not confirmed in the radiographs. Wrist-POCUS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI [0.956, 1]) and a specificity of 95.8% (95% CI [0.789, 0.999]) compared to radiographs. In 6 cases, there were minor differences regarding a concomitant ulnar buckle. The amount of prior ultrasound training had no influence on the accuracy of Wrist-POCUS for diagnosing distal forearm fractures. All fractures were reliably diagnosed even when captured POCUS images did not meet all quality criteria.

Conclusion: Pediatric surgeons and trainees, after minimal training in POCUS, had excellent diagnostic accuracy for distal forearm fractures in children and adolescents using POCUS compared to X-ray.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿骨科外科医生经过最低限度的培训后,利用护理点超声 (POCUS) 诊断疑似小儿前臂远端骨折。
背景:多项研究提倡使用超声波诊断儿童前臂远端骨折。然而,由儿科外科医生或管理儿童骨科损伤的受训人员对前臂远端骨折进行超声诊断的准确性数据却很有限。本研究的目的是确定儿科外科医生和受训人员在经过最低限度的培训后对小儿前臂远端骨折进行护理点超声(POCUS)诊断的准确性:这项诊断研究在德国一家三级医院急诊科进行。参与者为 15 岁以下的儿童和青少年,他们因急性、疑似、孤立性前臂远端骨折而到急诊科就诊,需要进行影像学检查。小儿外科医生和受训人员在接受了最基本的骨折声学诊断培训后,在进行X光成像前对每位受试者进行了6视角前臂远端POCUS检查。所有数据均从医院的常规数字患者档案中进行回顾性收集。主要结果是与作为参考标准的X光相比,POCUS的诊断准确性:2021年2月至6月,146名15岁以下儿童符合所有纳入和排除标准,106组数据可供分析。关于是否存在骨折,X射线和腕部POCUS显示99.1%的结果相同,其中83/106(78.3%)的骨折在两种模式下均可检测到,POCUS显示的1处疑似扣骨骨折未在X射线照片中得到证实。与X光片相比,腕部POCUS的灵敏度为100%(95% CI [0.956,1]),特异性为95.8%(95% CI [0.789,0.999])。在 6 个病例中,并发尺骨扣的情况略有不同。之前接受过多少超声培训对 Wrist-POCUS 诊断前臂远端骨折的准确性没有影响。即使采集的POCUS图像不符合所有质量标准,所有骨折都能得到可靠诊断:结论:小儿外科医生和受训人员在接受过最低限度的 POCUS 培训后,使用 POCUS 诊断儿童和青少年前臂远端骨折的准确性优于 X 光检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
Establishment of an MRI-based radiomics model for distinguishing between intramedullary spinal cord tumor and tumefactive demyelinating lesion. In vitro detection of cancer cells using a novel fluorescent choline derivative. Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal cancer by a clinical-deep learning radiomics model : Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy patients. Prior information guided deep-learning model for tumor bed segmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy. The predictive value of nomogram for adnexal cystic-solid masses based on O-RADS US, clinical and laboratory indicators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1