Clara François, Milad El Haddad, Benjamin De Becker, Maarten De Smet, Jean-Benoît Le Polain de Waroux, René Tavernier, Mattias Duytschaever, Sébastien Knecht
{"title":"Evaluation of posterior mitral isthmus ablation in the absence of a vein of Marshall.","authors":"Clara François, Milad El Haddad, Benjamin De Becker, Maarten De Smet, Jean-Benoît Le Polain de Waroux, René Tavernier, Mattias Duytschaever, Sébastien Knecht","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Achieving acute and durable mitral isthmus (MI) block remains challenging using radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation alone. Vein of Marshall (VoM) ethanolization results in chemical damage along the MI resulting in the creation of a durable transmural lesion with a very high rate of procedural block. However, no studies have systematically assessed the efficacy of MI ablation alone when no anatomical VoM is present.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Thirty seven patients without VoM evidenced after careful angiographic examination were included. Ablation parameters and result were compared with a matched control group in whom the posterior MI line was performed without assessing the presence of the VoM. Mitral isthmus block was achieved in 36 out of 37 patients without VoM (97%), with endocardial ablation only in 5/37 (14%) and combined endocardial and coronary sinus ablation in 32/37 patients (86%). There was a significant difference in the occurrence of block between patients without a VoM and the control group (97.3% vs. 65% respectively, P < 0.01), with a trend towards less needed RF {26 [interquartile range (IQR) 20-38] vs. 29 [IQR 19-40] tags [P = 0.8], 611 [IQR 443-805] vs. 746 [IQR 484-1193] seconds [P = 0.08]}.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The absence of a VoM is associated with a very high rate of procedural block during posterior MI ablation. The higher rate of MI block in this specific population would also suggest the crucial role of the VoM (when present) in resistant MI block.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae255","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Achieving acute and durable mitral isthmus (MI) block remains challenging using radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation alone. Vein of Marshall (VoM) ethanolization results in chemical damage along the MI resulting in the creation of a durable transmural lesion with a very high rate of procedural block. However, no studies have systematically assessed the efficacy of MI ablation alone when no anatomical VoM is present.
Methods and results: Thirty seven patients without VoM evidenced after careful angiographic examination were included. Ablation parameters and result were compared with a matched control group in whom the posterior MI line was performed without assessing the presence of the VoM. Mitral isthmus block was achieved in 36 out of 37 patients without VoM (97%), with endocardial ablation only in 5/37 (14%) and combined endocardial and coronary sinus ablation in 32/37 patients (86%). There was a significant difference in the occurrence of block between patients without a VoM and the control group (97.3% vs. 65% respectively, P < 0.01), with a trend towards less needed RF {26 [interquartile range (IQR) 20-38] vs. 29 [IQR 19-40] tags [P = 0.8], 611 [IQR 443-805] vs. 746 [IQR 484-1193] seconds [P = 0.08]}.
Conclusion: The absence of a VoM is associated with a very high rate of procedural block during posterior MI ablation. The higher rate of MI block in this specific population would also suggest the crucial role of the VoM (when present) in resistant MI block.
背景和目的:仅使用射频(RF)导管消融来实现急性和持久的二尖瓣峡部(MI)阻滞仍然具有挑战性。马歇尔静脉(VoM)乙醇化会导致二尖瓣峡部的化学损伤,从而形成持久的跨膜病变,手术阻滞率非常高。然而,还没有研究系统地评估了在没有解剖学马歇尔静脉的情况下单独进行 MI 消融的疗效:方法:纳入 37 例经仔细血管造影检查后未发现 VoM 的患者。将消融参数和结果与匹配的对照组进行比较,后者在未评估是否存在 VoM 的情况下进行后 MI 线消融:37例患者中有36例(97%)在没有VoM的情况下实现了心肌梗死阻断,其中5/37患者(14%)仅进行了心内膜消融,32/37患者(86%)进行了心内膜和CS联合消融。无马氏静脉的患者与对照组在阻滞发生率上存在明显差异(分别为 97.3% 和 65%,P=0.05):在二尖瓣后峡部消融术中,马歇尔静脉的缺失与极高的手术阻滞率有关。这一特殊人群的心肌梗死阻滞率较高,这也表明马歇尔静脉(如果存在)在抗性心肌梗死阻滞中的关键作用。
期刊介绍:
EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.