Head-to-head comparison of 18F-sodium fluoride coronary PET imaging between a silicon photomultiplier with digital photon counting and conventional scanners.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.102045
Hidenobu Hashimoto, Keiichiro Kuronuma, Mark C Hyun, Donghee Han, Valerie Builoff, Sebastian Cadet, Damini Dey, Daniel S Berman, Jacek Kwiecinski, Piotr J Slomka
{"title":"Head-to-head comparison of <sup>18</sup>F-sodium fluoride coronary PET imaging between a silicon photomultiplier with digital photon counting and conventional scanners.","authors":"Hidenobu Hashimoto, Keiichiro Kuronuma, Mark C Hyun, Donghee Han, Valerie Builoff, Sebastian Cadet, Damini Dey, Daniel S Berman, Jacek Kwiecinski, Piotr J Slomka","doi":"10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.102045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We compared silicone photomultipliers with digital photon counting (SiPM) and photomultiplier tubes (PMT) positron emission tomography (PET) in imaging coronary plaque activity with <sup>18</sup>F-sodium fluoride (<sup>18</sup>F-NaF) and evaluated comprehensively SiPM PET reconstruction settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 25 cardiovascular disease patients (mean age 67 ± 12 years), we conducted <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET on a SiPM (Biograph Vision) and conventional PET (Discovery 710) on the same day as part of a prospective clinical trial (NCT03689946). Following administration of 250 MBq of <sup>18</sup>F-NaF, patients underwent a contrast-enhanced CT angiography and a 30-min PET acquisition in list-mode on each PET consecutively. Image noise was defined as mean standard deviation of blood pool activity within the left atria. Target-to-background ratio (TBR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured within the whole-vessel tubular three-dimensional volumes of interest on the cardiac motion and attenuation-corrected <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET images using dedicated software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences in image noise and background activity between the two PETs (Image noise (%), PMT: 7.6 ± 3.7 vs SiPM: 4.0 ± 2.3, P < 0.001; background activity, PMT: 1.4 ± 0.4 vs SiPM: 1.0 ± 0.3, P < 0.001). Similarly, the SNR and TBR were significantly higher in vessels scanned with the SiPM PET (SNR, PMT: 16.3 ± 11.5 vs SiPM: 32.7 ± 29.8, P < 0.001; TBR, PMT: 0.8 ± 0.4 vs SiPM: 1.1 ± 0.6, P < 0.001). SiPM PET image reconstruction with a 256 matrix, 1.4 mm pixel, and 2 mm Gaussian filter provided best trade off in terms of maximal SNR, TBR, and clinically practical file size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In <sup>18</sup>F-NaF coronary PET imaging, the SiPM PET showed superior image contrast and less image noise compared with PMT PET.</p>","PeriodicalId":16476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"102045"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.102045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We compared silicone photomultipliers with digital photon counting (SiPM) and photomultiplier tubes (PMT) positron emission tomography (PET) in imaging coronary plaque activity with 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) and evaluated comprehensively SiPM PET reconstruction settings.

Methods: In 25 cardiovascular disease patients (mean age 67 ± 12 years), we conducted 18F-NaF PET on a SiPM (Biograph Vision) and conventional PET (Discovery 710) on the same day as part of a prospective clinical trial (NCT03689946). Following administration of 250 MBq of 18F-NaF, patients underwent a contrast-enhanced CT angiography and a 30-min PET acquisition in list-mode on each PET consecutively. Image noise was defined as mean standard deviation of blood pool activity within the left atria. Target-to-background ratio (TBR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured within the whole-vessel tubular three-dimensional volumes of interest on the cardiac motion and attenuation-corrected 18F-NaF PET images using dedicated software.

Results: There were significant differences in image noise and background activity between the two PETs (Image noise (%), PMT: 7.6 ± 3.7 vs SiPM: 4.0 ± 2.3, P < 0.001; background activity, PMT: 1.4 ± 0.4 vs SiPM: 1.0 ± 0.3, P < 0.001). Similarly, the SNR and TBR were significantly higher in vessels scanned with the SiPM PET (SNR, PMT: 16.3 ± 11.5 vs SiPM: 32.7 ± 29.8, P < 0.001; TBR, PMT: 0.8 ± 0.4 vs SiPM: 1.1 ± 0.6, P < 0.001). SiPM PET image reconstruction with a 256 matrix, 1.4 mm pixel, and 2 mm Gaussian filter provided best trade off in terms of maximal SNR, TBR, and clinically practical file size.

Conclusions: In 18F-NaF coronary PET imaging, the SiPM PET showed superior image contrast and less image noise compared with PMT PET.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字光子计数硅光电倍增管与传统扫描仪在 18F - 氟化钠冠状 PET 成像方面的正面比较。
背景:我们比较了硅光电倍增管与数字光子计数(SiPM)和光电倍增管(PMT)PET在用18F-氟化钠(18F-NaF)成像冠状动脉斑块活动时的效果,并全面评估了SiPM PET重建设置:作为前瞻性临床试验(NCT03689946)的一部分,我们在同一天对 25 名心血管疾病患者(平均年龄 67±12 岁)在 SiPM(Biograph Vision)和传统 PET(Discovery 710)上进行了 18F-NaF PET 扫描。给药 250 MBq 18F-NaF 后,患者连续接受造影剂增强 CT 血管造影和 30 分钟的 PET 列表模式采集。图像噪声定义为左心房内血池活动的平均标准偏差。使用专用软件测量心脏运动和衰减校正 18F-NaF PET 图像上感兴趣的全血管管状三维体积内的目标-背景比(TBR)和信噪比(SNR):结果:两种 PET 在图像噪声和背景活动方面存在明显差异(图像噪声(%),PMT:7.6±3.7 vs. SiPM:4.0±2.3,p结论:在 18F-NaF 冠状动脉 PET 成像中,与 PMT PET 相比,SiPM PET 的图像对比度更高,图像噪声更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.80%
发文量
249
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology is the only journal in the world devoted to this dynamic and growing subspecialty. Physicians and technologists value the Journal not only for its peer-reviewed articles, but also for its timely discussions about the current and future role of nuclear cardiology. Original articles address all aspects of nuclear cardiology, including interpretation, diagnosis, imaging equipment, and use of radiopharmaceuticals. As the official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Journal also brings readers the latest information emerging from the Society''s task forces and publishes guidelines and position papers as they are adopted.
期刊最新文献
Quantification of metabolic activity in the evaluation of cardiac sarcoidosis. Assessing the Effect of Repeat PET Imaging on Treatment Response and Cardiovascular Outcomes among a Homogenously Treated Cohort of Patients with Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis. Correlation between Technetium-99m pyrophosphate myocardial uptake and extracellular volume on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Prognostic value of Transient Ischemic Dilation on Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. Cardiac PET and CMR in Diagnosis of Epi-pericardial Fat Necrosis Associated with Severe Refractory Chest Pain Following Arrhythmia Ablation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1