What Environmental Metrics Are Used in Scientific Research to Estimate the Impact of Human Diets?

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrients Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.3390/nu16183166
Magaly Aceves-Martins, Anneli Lofstedt, Naara Libertad Godina Flores, Danielle Michelle Ortiz Hernández, Baukje de Roos
{"title":"What Environmental Metrics Are Used in Scientific Research to Estimate the Impact of Human Diets?","authors":"Magaly Aceves-Martins, Anneli Lofstedt, Naara Libertad Godina Flores, Danielle Michelle Ortiz Hernández, Baukje de Roos","doi":"10.3390/nu16183166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Metrics drive diagnosis, and metrics will also drive our response to the challenge of climate change. Recognising how current scientific research defines and uses metrics of the environmental impact of human diets is essential to understand which foods, food groups, or dietary patterns are associated with a higher environmental impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research, aided by artificial intelligence (AI), aimed to search, map, and synthesise current evidence on the commonly used definitions and metrics of the environmental impacts of human diets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 466 studies measuring the environmental impact of diets. Most studies were from North American or European countries (67%), with data mainly from high-income countries (81%). Most studies did not include methods to recall the provenance of the foods consumed. Most (53%) of the studies only used one metric to estimate the environmental impact of human diets, with 82% of the studies using GHGE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Agreement on how the environmental impact of diets is measured and more comprehensive and accurate data on the environmental impact of single foods is essential to better understand what changes in food systems are needed, at a consumer and policy level, to make a well-meaning change towards a more sustainable diet.</p>","PeriodicalId":19486,"journal":{"name":"Nutrients","volume":"16 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11435316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrients","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16183166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Metrics drive diagnosis, and metrics will also drive our response to the challenge of climate change. Recognising how current scientific research defines and uses metrics of the environmental impact of human diets is essential to understand which foods, food groups, or dietary patterns are associated with a higher environmental impact.

Methods: This research, aided by artificial intelligence (AI), aimed to search, map, and synthesise current evidence on the commonly used definitions and metrics of the environmental impacts of human diets.

Results: We identified 466 studies measuring the environmental impact of diets. Most studies were from North American or European countries (67%), with data mainly from high-income countries (81%). Most studies did not include methods to recall the provenance of the foods consumed. Most (53%) of the studies only used one metric to estimate the environmental impact of human diets, with 82% of the studies using GHGE.

Conclusions: Agreement on how the environmental impact of diets is measured and more comprehensive and accurate data on the environmental impact of single foods is essential to better understand what changes in food systems are needed, at a consumer and policy level, to make a well-meaning change towards a more sustainable diet.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学研究中使用哪些环境指标来估计人类饮食的影响?
背景/目标:指标推动诊断,指标也将推动我们应对气候变化的挑战。要了解哪些食物、食物种类或膳食模式对环境的影响更大,就必须认识到当前的科学研究是如何定义和使用人类膳食对环境影响的指标的:本研究在人工智能(AI)的辅助下,旨在搜索、绘制和综合当前有关人类饮食对环境影响的常用定义和指标的证据:结果:我们确定了 466 项衡量饮食对环境影响的研究。大多数研究来自北美或欧洲国家(67%),数据主要来自高收入国家(81%)。大多数研究没有采用回忆所食用食物来源的方法。大多数研究(53%)仅使用一种指标来估算人类膳食对环境的影响,其中 82% 的研究使用了 GHGE:结论:就如何衡量膳食对环境的影响达成一致,并就单一食物对环境的影响提供更全面、更准确的数据,对于更好地了解消费者和政策层面需要对食品系统做出哪些改变,以实现更可持续膳食的良好愿望至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrients
Nutrients NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
15.30%
发文量
4599
审稿时长
16.74 days
期刊介绍: Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643) is an international, peer-reviewed open access advanced forum for studies related to Human Nutrition. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Iodine Content of Commercially Available Iodized Salts in Hungary Determined by Iodometric Titration: Implications for the Effectiveness of Salt Iodization. Effects of Fortified Formula Milk Supplementation on Neurocognitive Development and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Preschool Children: A Cluster-Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Ten-Year Trends in Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D in Slovenia (2014-2023): Laboratory-Based Data from Tested Individuals and COVID-19-Period Changes. A Prolonged Nightly Fasting Plus Telehealth Coaching Intervention (PNF+) for Men on Androgen Deprivation Therapy for PCa: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial. Prevalence of Nutrition Standards Use by Municipalities in Government-Owned or Operated Properties, United States, 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1