Cortical oscillations and event-related brain potentials during the preparation and execution of deceptive behavior.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1111/psyp.14695
Robert Schnuerch, Jonas Schmuck, Henning Gibbons
{"title":"Cortical oscillations and event-related brain potentials during the preparation and execution of deceptive behavior.","authors":"Robert Schnuerch, Jonas Schmuck, Henning Gibbons","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deception often occurs in response to a preceding cue (e.g., a precarious question) alerting us about the need to subsequently lie. Here, we simulate this process by adapting a previously established paradigm of intentionally false responding, now instructing participants about the need for deception (vs. truthful responses) by means of a simple cue occurring before each response-relevant target. We analyzed event-related brain potentials (ERPs) as well as cortical oscillations recorded from the scalp. In an experimental study (N = 44), we show that a cue signaling the need for deception involves increased attentional selection (P2, P3a, P3b). Moreover, in the period following the cue and leading up to the target, ERP and oscillatory signatures of anticipation and preparation (Contingent Negative Variation, alpha suppression) were found to be increased during trials requiring a deceptive as compared to a truthful response. Additionally, we replicated earlier findings that target processing involves enhanced motivated attention toward words requiring a deceptive response (LPC). Moreover, a signature of integration effort and semantic inhibition (N400) was observed to be larger for words to which responses have to be intentionally false as compared to those to which responses must be truthful. Our findings support the view of the involvement of a series of basic cognitive processes (especially attention and cognitive control) when responses are deliberately wrong instead of right. Moreover, preceding cues signaling the subsequent need for lying already elicit attentional and preparatory mechanisms facilitating the cognitive operations necessary for later successful lying.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14695","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deception often occurs in response to a preceding cue (e.g., a precarious question) alerting us about the need to subsequently lie. Here, we simulate this process by adapting a previously established paradigm of intentionally false responding, now instructing participants about the need for deception (vs. truthful responses) by means of a simple cue occurring before each response-relevant target. We analyzed event-related brain potentials (ERPs) as well as cortical oscillations recorded from the scalp. In an experimental study (N = 44), we show that a cue signaling the need for deception involves increased attentional selection (P2, P3a, P3b). Moreover, in the period following the cue and leading up to the target, ERP and oscillatory signatures of anticipation and preparation (Contingent Negative Variation, alpha suppression) were found to be increased during trials requiring a deceptive as compared to a truthful response. Additionally, we replicated earlier findings that target processing involves enhanced motivated attention toward words requiring a deceptive response (LPC). Moreover, a signature of integration effort and semantic inhibition (N400) was observed to be larger for words to which responses have to be intentionally false as compared to those to which responses must be truthful. Our findings support the view of the involvement of a series of basic cognitive processes (especially attention and cognitive control) when responses are deliberately wrong instead of right. Moreover, preceding cues signaling the subsequent need for lying already elicit attentional and preparatory mechanisms facilitating the cognitive operations necessary for later successful lying.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准备和实施欺骗行为时的皮层振荡和事件相关脑电位
欺骗往往是在前面的提示(如一个不确定的问题)提醒我们随后需要撒谎的情况下发生的。在这里,我们通过改编以前建立的故意虚假应答范式来模拟这一过程,现在通过在每个应答相关目标之前出现的简单提示,让参与者了解欺骗(相对于真实应答)的必要性。我们分析了事件相关脑电位(ERPs)以及头皮记录的皮层振荡。在一项实验研究(N = 44)中,我们发现,提示需要欺骗的线索会增加注意力选择(P2、P3a、P3b)。此外,我们还发现,与真实反应相比,在需要欺骗性反应的试验中,在提示之后和目标之前的一段时间内,预期和准备的 ERP 和振荡特征(或有负变异、α抑制)都会增加。此外,我们还重复了之前的研究结果,即目标处理涉及对需要欺骗性反应的词语的更强的动机注意(LPC)。此外,我们还观察到,与必须做出真实反应的词语相比,必须做出故意虚假反应的词语的整合努力和语义抑制(N400)的特征更大。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即当回答故意错误而不是正确时,一系列基本认知过程(尤其是注意力和认知控制)会参与其中。此外,预示着随后需要说谎的线索已经引起了注意和准备机制,促进了后来成功说谎所需的认知操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of adaptation to stress cardiovascular responses in smokers during ad libitum smoking and withdrawal. The capacity limitations of multiple-template visual search during task preparation and target selection. The immediate and lasting effects of imagery rescripting and their associations with imagery tendency in young adults with childhood maltreatment history: An ERP study. Cortical and subcortical brain networks predict prevailing heart rate. Adversity and error-monitoring: Effects of emotional context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1