Application of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging During Laparoscopic Reoperations of the Biliary Tract Enhances Surgical Precision and Efficiency.

Ding-Wei Xu, Xin-Cheng Li, Ao Li, Yan Zhang, Manqin Hu, Jie Huang
{"title":"Application of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging During Laparoscopic Reoperations of the Biliary Tract Enhances Surgical Precision and Efficiency.","authors":"Ding-Wei Xu, Xin-Cheng Li, Ao Li, Yan Zhang, Manqin Hu, Jie Huang","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A history of abdominal surgery is considered a contraindication for laparoscopic procedures. However, the advancements in laparoscopic instruments and techniques have facilitated the performance of increasingly intricate operations, even in patients with prior abdominal surgeries. ICG fluorescence imaging technology offers advantages in terms of convenient operation and clearer intraoperative bile duct imaging, as confirmed by numerous international clinical studies on its feasibility and safety. The application of ICG fluorescence imaging technology in repeat laparoscopic biliary surgery, however, lacks sufficient reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of patients who underwent elective reoperation of the biliary tract in our department between January 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. ICG was injected peripherally before the operation, and near-infrared light was used for 3-dimensional imaging of the bile duct during the operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 143 patients were included in this study and divided into the fluorescence and nonfluorescence groups according to the inclusion criteria. Among the 26 patients in the fluorescence group, cholangiography was successfully performed in 24 cases, and the success rate of intraoperative biliary ICG fluorescence imaging was 92.31%. The intraoperative biliary tract identification time was significantly different between the fluorescence and nonfluorescence groups, but no statistical difference was observed in the final operation method, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss between the 2 groups. Although there was no significant difference in the postoperative ventilation rate, incidence of bile leakage, and stone recurrence rate at 6 months postoperatively between the 2 groups (P>0.05), a significant difference in postoperative hospitalization days was observed (P=0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of ICG fluorescence imaging technology in laparoscopic reoperation of the biliary tract is useful for the early identification of the biliary tract during operation, thereby shortening the operative time and reducing the risk of damage to nonoperative areas. This approach also enhances the visualization of the biliary system and avoids secondary injury intraoperatively due to poor identification of the biliary system. This technique is safe for repeat biliary tract surgery and has a good application prospect.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A history of abdominal surgery is considered a contraindication for laparoscopic procedures. However, the advancements in laparoscopic instruments and techniques have facilitated the performance of increasingly intricate operations, even in patients with prior abdominal surgeries. ICG fluorescence imaging technology offers advantages in terms of convenient operation and clearer intraoperative bile duct imaging, as confirmed by numerous international clinical studies on its feasibility and safety. The application of ICG fluorescence imaging technology in repeat laparoscopic biliary surgery, however, lacks sufficient reports.

Methods: The clinical data of patients who underwent elective reoperation of the biliary tract in our department between January 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. ICG was injected peripherally before the operation, and near-infrared light was used for 3-dimensional imaging of the bile duct during the operation.

Results: Altogether, 143 patients were included in this study and divided into the fluorescence and nonfluorescence groups according to the inclusion criteria. Among the 26 patients in the fluorescence group, cholangiography was successfully performed in 24 cases, and the success rate of intraoperative biliary ICG fluorescence imaging was 92.31%. The intraoperative biliary tract identification time was significantly different between the fluorescence and nonfluorescence groups, but no statistical difference was observed in the final operation method, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss between the 2 groups. Although there was no significant difference in the postoperative ventilation rate, incidence of bile leakage, and stone recurrence rate at 6 months postoperatively between the 2 groups (P>0.05), a significant difference in postoperative hospitalization days was observed (P=0.032).

Conclusion: The application of ICG fluorescence imaging technology in laparoscopic reoperation of the biliary tract is useful for the early identification of the biliary tract during operation, thereby shortening the operative time and reducing the risk of damage to nonoperative areas. This approach also enhances the visualization of the biliary system and avoids secondary injury intraoperatively due to poor identification of the biliary system. This technique is safe for repeat biliary tract surgery and has a good application prospect.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在胆道腹腔镜再手术中应用吲哚菁绿荧光成像提高手术精确度和效率
背景:腹部手术史被认为是腹腔镜手术的禁忌症。然而,腹腔镜器械和技术的进步使得越来越复杂的手术变得更加容易,即使是曾经接受过腹部手术的患者也不例外。ICG荧光成像技术具有操作方便、术中胆管成像更清晰等优点,其可行性和安全性已被大量国际临床研究证实。然而,ICG 荧光成像技术在重复腹腔镜胆道手术中的应用还缺乏足够的报道:方法:回顾性分析 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在我科接受胆道择期再手术患者的临床资料。方法:回顾性分析 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在我科接受胆道择期再手术的患者的临床资料,术前外周注射 ICG,术中使用近红外线灯对胆管进行三维成像:本研究共纳入 143 例患者,根据纳入标准分为荧光组和非荧光组。在荧光组的 26 例患者中,有 24 例成功进行了胆管造影,术中胆道 ICG 荧光成像的成功率为 92.31%。荧光组和非荧光组术中胆道识别时间有显著差异,但两组最终手术方式、手术时间和术中失血量无统计学差异。虽然两组术后通气率、胆汁漏发生率、术后6个月结石复发率无明显差异(P>0.05),但术后住院天数有明显差异(P=0.032):ICG荧光成像技术在腹腔镜胆道再手术中的应用有助于在手术过程中早期识别胆道,从而缩短手术时间,降低非手术区域受损的风险。这种方法还能增强胆道系统的可视性,避免术中因胆道系统识别不清而造成二次损伤。该技术对于重复胆道手术是安全的,具有良好的应用前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy Combined With Choledochoscopic Lithotomy for Complex Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones and Its Impact on Postoperative Liver Function. Surgical Options for Retained Gallstones After Cholecystectomy. Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Versus Open Segment 7 Hepatectomy. Minimally Invasive Pauli Parastomal Hernia Repair. Ventral Hernia Repair With a Hybrid Absorbable-permanent Preperitoneal Mesh.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1