Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and prognosis among pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, epirubicin and pirarubicin in HR ⩽ 10%/HER2-negative breast cancer: an exploratory real-world multicentre cohort study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359241279695
Yue Hong, Jing Peng, Qitong Chen, Qin Zhou, Feng Xu, Jia Yao, Qiongyan Zou, Liqin Yuan, Lun Li, Qian Long, Liqiu Liao, Mingwen Liu, Xuan Liu, Danhua Zhang, Shouman Wang, Wenjun Yi
{"title":"Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and prognosis among pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, epirubicin and pirarubicin in HR ⩽ 10%/HER2-negative breast cancer: an exploratory real-world multicentre cohort study.","authors":"Yue Hong, Jing Peng, Qitong Chen, Qin Zhou, Feng Xu, Jia Yao, Qiongyan Zou, Liqin Yuan, Lun Li, Qian Long, Liqiu Liao, Mingwen Liu, Xuan Liu, Danhua Zhang, Shouman Wang, Wenjun Yi","doi":"10.1177/17588359241279695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), epirubicin and pirarubicin are the main anthracyclines widely used in China. PLD demonstrates therapeutic response comparable to epirubicin and pirarubicin in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of our study were to retrospectively assess the real-world effectiveness and prognostic characteristics of PLD as NAC for HR ⩽ 10%/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study enrolled patients with HR ⩽ 10%/HER2-negative breast cancer who received PLD-, epirubicin- or pirarubicin-based NAC from three centres in Hunan Province, China, between 2015 and 2022. We employed inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the differences in patients' characteristics among the PLD, epirubicin, and pirarubicin groups. The endpoints were pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 267 patients were included. After NAC, the pCR rates in PLD group were superior to epirubicin group (PLD, 34.1%; epirubicin, 20.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.038). The differences in EFS (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.99) and OS (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.33) among the three groups were not statistically significant. Among the three groups, non-pCR patients had worse EFS than pCR patients (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.014). For patients with pCR, the differences in EFS (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.47) and OS (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.38) were not statistically significant among the three groups, and the EFS (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.59) and OS (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.14) of non-pCR patients in the PLD group were similar to those in the epirubicin and pirarubicin groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PLD had a similar therapeutic response and prognosis compared to epirubicin or pirarubicin in NAC for patients with HR ⩽ 10%/HER2 negative breast cancer, which means that PLD represents a potential NAC option.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17588359241279695"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241279695","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), epirubicin and pirarubicin are the main anthracyclines widely used in China. PLD demonstrates therapeutic response comparable to epirubicin and pirarubicin in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of breast cancer.

Objectives: The objectives of our study were to retrospectively assess the real-world effectiveness and prognostic characteristics of PLD as NAC for HR ⩽ 10%/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer.

Design: This was a retrospective study.

Methods: Our study enrolled patients with HR ⩽ 10%/HER2-negative breast cancer who received PLD-, epirubicin- or pirarubicin-based NAC from three centres in Hunan Province, China, between 2015 and 2022. We employed inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the differences in patients' characteristics among the PLD, epirubicin, and pirarubicin groups. The endpoints were pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: A total of 267 patients were included. After NAC, the pCR rates in PLD group were superior to epirubicin group (PLD, 34.1%; epirubicin, 20.8%, p = 0.038). The differences in EFS (log-rank p = 0.99) and OS (log-rank p = 0.33) among the three groups were not statistically significant. Among the three groups, non-pCR patients had worse EFS than pCR patients (log-rank p = 0.014). For patients with pCR, the differences in EFS (log-rank p = 0.47) and OS (log-rank p = 0.38) were not statistically significant among the three groups, and the EFS (log-rank p = 0.59) and OS (log-rank p = 0.14) of non-pCR patients in the PLD group were similar to those in the epirubicin and pirarubicin groups.

Conclusion: PLD had a similar therapeutic response and prognosis compared to epirubicin or pirarubicin in NAC for patients with HR ⩽ 10%/HER2 negative breast cancer, which means that PLD represents a potential NAC option.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HR ⩽10%/HER2阴性乳腺癌患者接受聚乙二醇脂质体多柔比星、表柔比星和吡拉比星新辅助化疗的反应和预后比较:一项探索性真实世界多中心队列研究。
背景:聚乙二醇脂质体多柔比星(PLD)、表柔比星和吡拉比星是中国广泛使用的主要蒽环类药物。在乳腺癌新辅助化疗(NAC)中,PLD的治疗反应与表柔比星和吡柔比星相当:我们的研究旨在回顾性评估PLD作为HR⩽10%/人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗的实际疗效和预后特征:这是一项回顾性研究:我们的研究纳入了中国湖南省三个中心在2015年至2022年间接受以PLD、表柔比星或吡拉比星为基础的新农合治疗的HR⩽10%/HER2阴性乳腺癌患者。我们采用了逆治疗概率加权法来平衡PLD组、表柔比星组和吡拉比星组之间患者特征的差异。研究终点为病理完全反应(pCR)、无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS):结果:共纳入 267 例患者。NAC后,PLD组的病理完全反应率优于表柔比星组(PLD,34.1%;表柔比星,20.8%,P = 0.038)。三组患者的 EFS(log-rank p = 0.99)和 OS(log-rank p = 0.33)差异无统计学意义。在三组患者中,非 pCR 患者的 EFS 差于 pCR 患者(log-rank p = 0.014)。对于pCR患者,三组的EFS(log-rank p = 0.47)和OS(log-rank p = 0.38)差异无统计学意义,PLD组非CR患者的EFS(log-rank p = 0.59)和OS(log-rank p = 0.14)与表柔比星组和吡拉比星组相似:结论:对于HR⩽10%/HER2阴性乳腺癌患者,与表柔比星或吡拉比星相比,PLD在新农合中具有相似的治疗反应和预后,这意味着PLD是一种潜在的新农合选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
UFO registry: final analysis of baseline data from patients with advanced prostate cancer in Asia. Phase II trial of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors SWOG/NCI experience: invasive mucinous or non-mucinous lepidic adenocarcinoma of the lung (formerly bronchioloalveolar carcinoma). Perspective review: lessons from successful clinical trials and real-world studies of systemic therapy for metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Antibody-drug conjugates in patients with advanced/metastatic HER2-low-expressing breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma with exceptionally long response to lorlatinib-a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1