Rotstop and urea treatments do not affect composition of fungal community and diversity in Norway spruce stumps

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biological Control Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105619
{"title":"Rotstop and urea treatments do not affect composition of fungal community and diversity in Norway spruce stumps","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fungus <em>Heterobasidion annosum</em> s.l. is one of the most destructive pathogens in coniferous forests in the Northern Hemisphere spreading during most of the year with spores and through root contact. However, especially in commercial forest land where forests are in active economic use, it is necessary to implement countermeasures against the spread of the pathogen with stump treatment. For this purpose, the effects of the biological control Rotstop and chemical control urea against <em>Heterobasidion</em> infection were analysed. The best practise for treatment of stumps with Rotstop is mechanical application during thinning, but stump treatment can be delayed after winter thinning due to warmer winters. We analysed the effect of Rotstop treatment on the fungal community and its diversity after mechanical and manual thinning. We found that Rotstop treatment did not significantly decrease fungal diversity at the genus level after mechanical stump treatment. The stump treatment with Rotstop was more successful in mechanically treated stumps, where the effectiveness of Rotstop treatment was 91 %. The treatment with Rotstop was more effective on the <em>Hepatica</em> (97 %) compared to <em>Oxalis</em> site type (84 %), however, the difference was not statistically significant. On the <em>Oxalis</em> site type, 6.0 % of all sequences per sample from Rotstop treated stumps harboured <em>P. gigantea,</em> while on the <em>Hepatica</em> site type 10 % of all sequences were identified as <em>P. gigantea</em>. In manually treated stumps, <em>Heterobasidion</em> and <em>P. gigantea</em> accounted for 6.4 % and 1.0 % of all sequences, respectively. Although the composition of detected taxons was different among sites treated with urea, versus sites treated with Rotstop and control areas, 60.1 % of all taxons detected in the dataset were shared among all three treatments. Fungal species richness and Shannon species diversity indexes were similar in all three manually prepared treatments (Rotstop, urea and control). Rotstop and urea manual treatments 3 months after winter thinning had no significant effect on the relative abundance of <em>Heterobasidion</em>. The results also indicate that only winter thinning (average daily temperature &lt; 5℃) does not control or reduce the <em>Heterobasidion</em> infection from the cut side of the stump.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8880,"journal":{"name":"Biological Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Control","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964424001841","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fungus Heterobasidion annosum s.l. is one of the most destructive pathogens in coniferous forests in the Northern Hemisphere spreading during most of the year with spores and through root contact. However, especially in commercial forest land where forests are in active economic use, it is necessary to implement countermeasures against the spread of the pathogen with stump treatment. For this purpose, the effects of the biological control Rotstop and chemical control urea against Heterobasidion infection were analysed. The best practise for treatment of stumps with Rotstop is mechanical application during thinning, but stump treatment can be delayed after winter thinning due to warmer winters. We analysed the effect of Rotstop treatment on the fungal community and its diversity after mechanical and manual thinning. We found that Rotstop treatment did not significantly decrease fungal diversity at the genus level after mechanical stump treatment. The stump treatment with Rotstop was more successful in mechanically treated stumps, where the effectiveness of Rotstop treatment was 91 %. The treatment with Rotstop was more effective on the Hepatica (97 %) compared to Oxalis site type (84 %), however, the difference was not statistically significant. On the Oxalis site type, 6.0 % of all sequences per sample from Rotstop treated stumps harboured P. gigantea, while on the Hepatica site type 10 % of all sequences were identified as P. gigantea. In manually treated stumps, Heterobasidion and P. gigantea accounted for 6.4 % and 1.0 % of all sequences, respectively. Although the composition of detected taxons was different among sites treated with urea, versus sites treated with Rotstop and control areas, 60.1 % of all taxons detected in the dataset were shared among all three treatments. Fungal species richness and Shannon species diversity indexes were similar in all three manually prepared treatments (Rotstop, urea and control). Rotstop and urea manual treatments 3 months after winter thinning had no significant effect on the relative abundance of Heterobasidion. The results also indicate that only winter thinning (average daily temperature < 5℃) does not control or reduce the Heterobasidion infection from the cut side of the stump.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腐烂抑制剂和尿素处理不会影响挪威云杉树桩中真菌群落的组成和多样性
Heterobasidion annosum s.l.真菌是北半球针叶林中最具破坏性的病原体之一,一年中的大部分时间都会通过孢子和根部接触传播。然而,特别是在经济用途活跃的商业林地,有必要采取树桩处理措施来防止病原体的传播。为此,我们分析了生物防治轮虫和化学防治尿素对异伞菌感染的效果。用腐霉菌抑制剂处理树桩的最佳方法是在疏伐期间进行机械施药,但由于冬季较暖,树桩处理可能会在冬季疏伐后推迟。我们分析了机械疏伐和人工疏伐后,腐止剂处理对真菌群落及其多样性的影响。我们发现,在机械树桩处理后,Rotstop 处理并没有明显降低真菌属一级的多样性。使用 Rotstop 的树桩处理在机械处理的树桩上更为成功,Rotstop 处理的有效率为 91%。与牛筋草(84%)相比,用腐杀菌剂处理七叶树(97%)的效果更好,但差异在统计学上并不显著。在牛筋草地点类型中,经腐杀菌剂处理的树桩每个样本的所有序列中有 6.0% 含有千头椿,而在七叶树地点类型中,所有序列中有 10% 被鉴定为千头椿。在人工处理过的树桩中,异伞形花序(Heterobasidion)和巨伞形花序(P. gigantea)分别占所有序列的 6.4% 和 1.0%。虽然使用尿素处理的地点与使用腐霉利处理的地点和对照区检测到的分类群组成不同,但在数据集中检测到的所有分类群中,60.1%的分类群在所有三种处理方法中是共有的。三种人工处理(Rotstop、尿素和对照)的真菌物种丰富度和香农物种多样性指数相似。在冬季疏伐后 3 个月进行的防腐处理和尿素人工处理对异伞菌的相对丰度没有显著影响。结果还表明,只有冬季疏伐(日平均气温为 5℃)才能控制或减少树桩切口一侧的杂兵虫感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Control
Biological Control 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
220
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Biological control is an environmentally sound and effective means of reducing or mitigating pests and pest effects through the use of natural enemies. The aim of Biological Control is to promote this science and technology through publication of original research articles and reviews of research and theory. The journal devotes a section to reports on biotechnologies dealing with the elucidation and use of genes or gene products for the enhancement of biological control agents. The journal encompasses biological control of viral, microbial, nematode, insect, mite, weed, and vertebrate pests in agriculture, aquatic, forest, natural resource, stored product, and urban environments. Biological control of arthropod pests of human and domestic animals is also included. Ecological, molecular, and biotechnological approaches to the understanding of biological control are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Constitutive and inducible tomato defenses contribute to Bacillus thuringiensis lethality against Spodoptera exigua Editorial: The XVI international symposium on biological control of weeds Rotstop and urea treatments do not affect composition of fungal community and diversity in Norway spruce stumps Bacillus velezensis GX1 and its potential for the control of lily bulb rot Biocontrol of fungal pathogens and growth promotion in the Korean fir (Abies koreana E.H.Wilson) seedling using Bacillus velezensis CE 100
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1