Has Ghana's Rotavirus Vaccine Switch Met Programmatic Expectations? An Analysis of National Surveillance Data; 2018-2022.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae539
Michael Rockson Adjei, Justice Ofori Amoah, George Bonsu, Rafiq Okine, Naziru Tanko Mohammed, Kwame Amponsa-Achiano, Franklin Asiedu-Bekoe, Patrick Kuma-Aboagye, Jason Mathiu Mwenda, Martin Peter Grobusch, Sally-Ann Ohene
{"title":"Has Ghana's Rotavirus Vaccine Switch Met Programmatic Expectations? An Analysis of National Surveillance Data; 2018-2022.","authors":"Michael Rockson Adjei, Justice Ofori Amoah, George Bonsu, Rafiq Okine, Naziru Tanko Mohammed, Kwame Amponsa-Achiano, Franklin Asiedu-Bekoe, Patrick Kuma-Aboagye, Jason Mathiu Mwenda, Martin Peter Grobusch, Sally-Ann Ohene","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ghana introduced a 2-dose schedule rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix, into childhood immunization in 2012 but switched to a 3-dose schedule vaccine, Rotavac, in 2020 on account of programmatic advantages offered by the latter, including lower cost per fully immunized child and lower cold chain volume requirement. The objective of the study was to assess the effect of the vaccine switch on the trends of rotavirus vaccine uptake and health facility outpatient department (OPD) attendance due to diarrhea among children aged 1-11 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on childhood immunization and diarrhea surveillance data for 2018-2022. The uptake of the different rotavirus vaccine products and the proportion of health facility OPD attendance attributed to diarrhea, respectively, were compared between the pre- and postswitch study periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The uptake of rotavirus vaccine was sustained following the switch. There were no significant differences in vaccination coverages (rota1, Rotarix coverage [94.3%], vs rota1, Rotavac coverage [95.3%]; <i>P</i> = .757; rota2, Rotarix coverage [91.3%], vs rota2, Rotavac coverage [92.7%]; <i>P</i> = .789). The proportions of health facility OPD attendance due to diarrhea were comparable (preswitch [12.4%] vs postswitch [12.1%]; <i>P</i> = .838).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ghana's rotavirus vaccine switch yielded expected programmatic benefits without any untoward effects. The trends of vaccine uptake and reduction in diarrhea morbidity were sustained. These experiences and lessons from the rotavirus vaccine switch are vital for potential switches for other vaccines in the current immunization schedule to mitigate the annual vaccine expenditure.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ghana introduced a 2-dose schedule rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix, into childhood immunization in 2012 but switched to a 3-dose schedule vaccine, Rotavac, in 2020 on account of programmatic advantages offered by the latter, including lower cost per fully immunized child and lower cold chain volume requirement. The objective of the study was to assess the effect of the vaccine switch on the trends of rotavirus vaccine uptake and health facility outpatient department (OPD) attendance due to diarrhea among children aged 1-11 months.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on childhood immunization and diarrhea surveillance data for 2018-2022. The uptake of the different rotavirus vaccine products and the proportion of health facility OPD attendance attributed to diarrhea, respectively, were compared between the pre- and postswitch study periods.

Results: The uptake of rotavirus vaccine was sustained following the switch. There were no significant differences in vaccination coverages (rota1, Rotarix coverage [94.3%], vs rota1, Rotavac coverage [95.3%]; P = .757; rota2, Rotarix coverage [91.3%], vs rota2, Rotavac coverage [92.7%]; P = .789). The proportions of health facility OPD attendance due to diarrhea were comparable (preswitch [12.4%] vs postswitch [12.1%]; P = .838).

Conclusions: Ghana's rotavirus vaccine switch yielded expected programmatic benefits without any untoward effects. The trends of vaccine uptake and reduction in diarrhea morbidity were sustained. These experiences and lessons from the rotavirus vaccine switch are vital for potential switches for other vaccines in the current immunization schedule to mitigate the annual vaccine expenditure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳轮状病毒疫苗转换是否达到了计划预期?全国监测数据分析;2018-2022 年。
背景:加纳于2012年在儿童免疫接种中引入了2剂型轮状病毒疫苗Rotarix,但考虑到3剂型轮状病毒疫苗Rotavac在计划方面的优势,包括每名完全免疫接种儿童的成本更低以及对冷链容量的要求更低,加纳于2020年改用3剂型轮状病毒疫苗Rotavac。本研究的目的是评估疫苗转换对轮状病毒疫苗接种率和医疗机构门诊部(OPD)中 1-11 个月大儿童因腹泻就诊人数趋势的影响:对2018-2022年的儿童免疫接种和腹泻监测数据进行了回顾性分析。分别比较了不同轮状病毒疫苗产品的接种率和因腹泻而到医疗机构 OPD 就诊的比例:结果:轮状病毒疫苗的接种率在转换后保持不变。疫苗接种覆盖率没有明显差异(rota1,Rotarix 覆盖率[94.3%],vs rota1,Rotavac 覆盖率[95.3%];P = .757;rota2,Rotarix 覆盖率[91.3%],vs rota2,Rotavac 覆盖率[92.7%];P = .789)。因腹泻到医疗机构门诊就诊的比例相当(切换前 [12.4%] vs 切换后 [12.1%];P = .838):结论:加纳轮状病毒疫苗的切换产生了预期的计划效益,没有产生任何不良影响。疫苗接种率和腹泻发病率下降的趋势得以持续。从轮状病毒疫苗转换中获得的这些经验和教训对当前免疫接种计划中其他疫苗的潜在转换至关重要,可减少每年的疫苗支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Low Prevalence of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir Resistance-Associated Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Lineages From Botswana. A Retrospective Assessment of Guideline Adherence and Treatment Outcomes From Clostridioides difficile Infection Following the IDSA 2021 Clinical Guideline Update: Clostridioides difficile Infection. Has Ghana's Rotavirus Vaccine Switch Met Programmatic Expectations? An Analysis of National Surveillance Data; 2018-2022. Impact of COVID-19 Nonpharmaceutical Interventions on Bordetella pertussis, Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Influenza Virus, and Seasonal Coronavirus Antibody Levels: A Systematic Review. Severe Optic Neuropathy Induced by Very Prolonged Tedizolid as Suppressive Therapy: Description of a Case Report and Implication for Better Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1