Detecting a shadow pandemic: The current state and future direction of screening and assessment tools for intimate partner violence-related brain injury.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105912
Abigail D Astridge Clarke, Charlotte Copas, Olivia Hannon, Christine Padgett, Jennifer Makovec Knight, Aimee Falkenberg, Hannah Varto, Karen Mason, Cheryl L Wellington, Paul van Donkelaar, Jacqueline Marks, Sandy R Shultz, Georgia F Symons
{"title":"Detecting a shadow pandemic: The current state and future direction of screening and assessment tools for intimate partner violence-related brain injury.","authors":"Abigail D Astridge Clarke, Charlotte Copas, Olivia Hannon, Christine Padgett, Jennifer Makovec Knight, Aimee Falkenberg, Hannah Varto, Karen Mason, Cheryl L Wellington, Paul van Donkelaar, Jacqueline Marks, Sandy R Shultz, Georgia F Symons","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major global concern, and IPV victim-survivors are at an increased risk of brain injury (BI) due to the physical assaults. IPV-BI can encompass both mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and non-fatal strangulation (NFS), but IPV-BI often goes undetected and untreated due to a number of complicating factors. Therefore, the clinical care and support of IPV victim-survivors could be enhanced by BI screening and assessment in various settings (e.g., first responders, emergency departments, primary care providers, rehabilitation, shelters, and research). Further, appropriate screening and assessment for IPV-BI will support more accurate identifications, and prevalence estimates, improve understanding of health implications, and have the potential to inform policy decisions. Here we overview the seven available tools that have been used for IPV-BI screening and assessment purposes, including the BISA, BISQ-IPV, BAT-L/IPV, OSU TBI-ID, the HELPS, and the CHATS, and outline the advantages and disadvantages of these screening tools in the clinical, community, and research settings. Recommendations for further research to enhance the validity and utility of these tools are also included.</p>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105912","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major global concern, and IPV victim-survivors are at an increased risk of brain injury (BI) due to the physical assaults. IPV-BI can encompass both mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and non-fatal strangulation (NFS), but IPV-BI often goes undetected and untreated due to a number of complicating factors. Therefore, the clinical care and support of IPV victim-survivors could be enhanced by BI screening and assessment in various settings (e.g., first responders, emergency departments, primary care providers, rehabilitation, shelters, and research). Further, appropriate screening and assessment for IPV-BI will support more accurate identifications, and prevalence estimates, improve understanding of health implications, and have the potential to inform policy decisions. Here we overview the seven available tools that have been used for IPV-BI screening and assessment purposes, including the BISA, BISQ-IPV, BAT-L/IPV, OSU TBI-ID, the HELPS, and the CHATS, and outline the advantages and disadvantages of these screening tools in the clinical, community, and research settings. Recommendations for further research to enhance the validity and utility of these tools are also included.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检测影子流行病:亲密伴侣暴力相关脑损伤筛查和评估工具的现状和未来方向。
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是全球关注的一个主要问题,IPV 受害者-幸存者因遭受人身攻击而增加了脑损伤(BI)的风险。IPV-BI可包括轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)和非致命性勒颈(NFS),但IPV-BI往往因一些复杂因素而未被发现和治疗。因此,通过在各种环境(如急救人员、急诊科、初级保健提供者、康复中心、庇护所和研究机构)中进行脑损伤筛查和评估,可以加强对 IPV 受害者-幸存者的临床护理和支持。此外,对 IPV-BI 进行适当的筛查和评估将有助于更准确地识别和估计流行率,提高对健康影响的认识,并有可能为政策决策提供依据。在此,我们概述了七种已用于 IPV-BI 筛查和评估的可用工具,包括 BISA、BISQ-IPV、BAT-L/IPV、OSU TBI-ID、HELPS 和 CHATS,并概述了这些筛查工具在临床、社区和研究环境中的优缺点。此外,还就进一步开展研究以提高这些工具的有效性和实用性提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
期刊最新文献
3D-optical motion capturing examination of sensori- and psychomotor abnormalities in mental disorders: progress and perspectives. Mapping the mentalizing brain: An ALE meta-analysis to differentiate the representation of social scenes and ages on theory of mind. Incorporating sex and gender considerations in research on psychosocial work exposures and cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review of 55 prospective studies. Perspective role of Substance P in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: From neuronal vulnerability to neuroprotection. Detecting a shadow pandemic: The current state and future direction of screening and assessment tools for intimate partner violence-related brain injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1