Mass media guidelines for sports concussion: a scoping review protocol.

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002202
Karen A Sullivan, Keeley Lappin, Kannan Singaravelu Jaganathan, Catherine Haden
{"title":"Mass media guidelines for sports concussion: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Karen A Sullivan, Keeley Lappin, Kannan Singaravelu Jaganathan, Catherine Haden","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sports concussion is a common and costly injury, and increased public injury awareness could help reduce costs. Many factors, including public messages about sports concussion by the sports media, shape public injury awareness. Empirical analyses show that this messaging can be poor. The proposed solutions include providing media guidance, but little is known about this topic. This scoping review will enable a systematic search and synthesis of guidance materials for improved health messaging of sports concussion by the mass media. The five review stages are (1) determining the research question, (2) identifying relevant materials, (3) selecting relevant information, (4) data extraction and (5) analysis and presentation of the results. A brief protocol will be registered on a recommended platform (Open Science Framework). The search strategy will access 20 databases, as well as Google and Google Scholar, and include hand searching. Selected materials must describe or provide mass media guidance for sports concussion by a health-affiliated authority. Eligibility will be confirmed via a two-stage screening process, including independent assessment. Data from eligible materials will be extracted and collated in tables. If sufficient or appropriate materials are identified, the synthesis will draw on key evaluative resources related to injury management and guideline development methodologies. The knowledge synthesis will use descriptive and narrative methods to determine what is known on this topic, including documenting existing guidance (content and properties) and using the extracted data to inform recommendations for future guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sports concussion is a common and costly injury, and increased public injury awareness could help reduce costs. Many factors, including public messages about sports concussion by the sports media, shape public injury awareness. Empirical analyses show that this messaging can be poor. The proposed solutions include providing media guidance, but little is known about this topic. This scoping review will enable a systematic search and synthesis of guidance materials for improved health messaging of sports concussion by the mass media. The five review stages are (1) determining the research question, (2) identifying relevant materials, (3) selecting relevant information, (4) data extraction and (5) analysis and presentation of the results. A brief protocol will be registered on a recommended platform (Open Science Framework). The search strategy will access 20 databases, as well as Google and Google Scholar, and include hand searching. Selected materials must describe or provide mass media guidance for sports concussion by a health-affiliated authority. Eligibility will be confirmed via a two-stage screening process, including independent assessment. Data from eligible materials will be extracted and collated in tables. If sufficient or appropriate materials are identified, the synthesis will draw on key evaluative resources related to injury management and guideline development methodologies. The knowledge synthesis will use descriptive and narrative methods to determine what is known on this topic, including documenting existing guidance (content and properties) and using the extracted data to inform recommendations for future guidance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动脑震荡的大众传媒指南:范围审查协议。
运动脑震荡是一种常见且代价高昂的损伤,提高公众的损伤意识有助于降低成本。影响公众伤害意识的因素很多,其中包括体育媒体对运动脑震荡的公开宣传。实证分析表明,这种信息传递的效果可能很差。建议的解决方案包括提供媒体指导,但人们对这一主题知之甚少。本次范围界定审查将对指导材料进行系统搜索和综合,以改进大众传媒对运动脑震荡的健康宣传。综述分为五个阶段:(1) 确定研究问题;(2) 识别相关资料;(3) 选择相关信息;(4) 数据提取;(5) 分析和展示结果。将在推荐的平台(开放科学框架)上注册一份简短的协议。搜索策略将访问 20 个数据库以及 Google 和 Google Scholar,包括手工搜索。入选材料必须描述或提供由卫生部门提供的有关运动脑震荡的大众媒体指导。将通过包括独立评估在内的两阶段筛选过程确认是否符合条件。将从符合条件的资料中提取数据并整理成表。如果确定了足够或适当的资料,综合报告将借鉴与损伤管理和指南制定方法相关的主要评估资源。知识综述将使用描述性和叙述性方法来确定该主题的已知信息,包括记录现有指南(内容和属性),并使用提取的数据为未来指南的建议提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cardiac health in breast cancer (CHiB): protocol for a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. It's about timing: how density can benefit future research on the optimal dosage of acute physical exercise breaks in esports. 24-hour Movement Behaviour study-Lithuanian protocol: a comprehensive overview of behaviours and health outcomes in adolescents. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic exercise versus myofascial trigger point therapy in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathies: a randomised controlled trial. Correction: Differences in the technical performance of heading between men and women football players during FIFA World Cup 2022 and FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 matches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1