Functional diversity of ground beetles improved aphid control but did not increase crop yields on European farms.

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Applications Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1002/eap.3035
Roman Bucher, Péter Batáry, Julia Baudry, Léa Beaumelle, Andrea Čerevková, Enrique G de la Riva, Tara Dirilgen, Róbert Gallé, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Ewa Rembiałkowska, Adrien Rusch, Dara A Stanley, Werner Ulrich, Klaus Birkhofer
{"title":"Functional diversity of ground beetles improved aphid control but did not increase crop yields on European farms.","authors":"Roman Bucher, Péter Batáry, Julia Baudry, Léa Beaumelle, Andrea Čerevková, Enrique G de la Riva, Tara Dirilgen, Róbert Gallé, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Ewa Rembiałkowska, Adrien Rusch, Dara A Stanley, Werner Ulrich, Klaus Birkhofer","doi":"10.1002/eap.3035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Land-use intensification is often associated with a decline in functional diversity, potentially undermining the provision of ecosystem services. However, how changes in traits affect ecosystem processes remains poorly understood. Variation in trait values among species in a community may drive ecosystem processes. Alternatively, the mass ratio hypothesis proposes that trait values of the dominant species in a local community are related to ecosystem processes. Using data from 159 farms in six European countries, we quantified the impact of local and landscape-level land-use intensity on ground beetles as pest control agents. We then assessed the extent to which functional diversity and community-weighted mean trait values relate to pest control and cereal yield. In addition, we assessed how the responses to land use and the effects of different species on pest control and yield varied with their traits to compare the relative impact of the traits studied. Functional diversity of ground beetles improved aphid removal, but did not translate into higher crop yields. Pest control of aphids was enhanced by a higher proportion of smaller, mobile ground beetles with a preference for the vegetation layer. Smaller, predatory ground beetles in communities improved crop yield. The magnitude of responses to land-use intensification and the effects on pest control and yield were more strongly influenced by body size than other traits. Our study provides evidence that reduced management intensity can improve pest control by supporting small-sized, macropterous ground beetles. In contrast to the claims of ecological intensification, our joint analysis of the direct effects of land use on yield and indirect effects via functional diversity of ground beetles and pest control suggests that ecosystem services by ground beetles cannot compensate for the yield gap due to a reduction in land-use intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":" ","pages":"e3035"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.3035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Land-use intensification is often associated with a decline in functional diversity, potentially undermining the provision of ecosystem services. However, how changes in traits affect ecosystem processes remains poorly understood. Variation in trait values among species in a community may drive ecosystem processes. Alternatively, the mass ratio hypothesis proposes that trait values of the dominant species in a local community are related to ecosystem processes. Using data from 159 farms in six European countries, we quantified the impact of local and landscape-level land-use intensity on ground beetles as pest control agents. We then assessed the extent to which functional diversity and community-weighted mean trait values relate to pest control and cereal yield. In addition, we assessed how the responses to land use and the effects of different species on pest control and yield varied with their traits to compare the relative impact of the traits studied. Functional diversity of ground beetles improved aphid removal, but did not translate into higher crop yields. Pest control of aphids was enhanced by a higher proportion of smaller, mobile ground beetles with a preference for the vegetation layer. Smaller, predatory ground beetles in communities improved crop yield. The magnitude of responses to land-use intensification and the effects on pest control and yield were more strongly influenced by body size than other traits. Our study provides evidence that reduced management intensity can improve pest control by supporting small-sized, macropterous ground beetles. In contrast to the claims of ecological intensification, our joint analysis of the direct effects of land use on yield and indirect effects via functional diversity of ground beetles and pest control suggests that ecosystem services by ground beetles cannot compensate for the yield gap due to a reduction in land-use intensity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地甲虫的功能多样性改善了欧洲农场对蚜虫的控制,但并未提高作物产量。
土地使用的集约化往往与功能多样性的减少有关,这可能会破坏生态系统服务的提供。然而,人们对性状变化如何影响生态系统过程仍然知之甚少。群落中物种间性状值的变化可能会驱动生态系统过程。另外,质量比假说认为,当地群落中优势物种的性状值与生态系统过程有关。利用来自六个欧洲国家 159 个农场的数据,我们量化了当地和景观层面的土地利用强度对作为害虫控制剂的地甲虫的影响。然后,我们评估了功能多样性和群落加权平均性状值与害虫控制和谷物产量的相关程度。此外,我们还评估了对土地利用的反应以及不同物种对害虫控制和产量的影响如何随其性状而变化,以比较所研究性状的相对影响。地甲虫的功能多样性提高了蚜虫的清除率,但并没有转化为更高的作物产量。体型较小、活动能力强且喜欢植被层的地甲虫比例越高,对蚜虫的虫害控制能力就越强。群落中体型较小、具有捕食能力的地甲虫提高了作物产量。与其他性状相比,体型对土地使用强度的反应程度以及对害虫控制和产量的影响受体型的影响更大。我们的研究提供了证据,证明降低管理强度可以通过支持小体型、大食性地甲虫来改善害虫控制。与生态集约化的说法相反,我们对土地利用对产量的直接影响以及通过地鳖的功能多样性和害虫控制产生的间接影响进行的联合分析表明,地鳖提供的生态系统服务无法弥补土地利用强度降低造成的产量差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
期刊最新文献
Probabilistic ecological risk assessment for deep‐sea mining: A Bayesian network for Chatham Rise, Pacific Ocean Active restoration efforts drive community succession and assembly in a desert during the past 53 years Declining ecological resilience and invasion resistance under climate change in the sagebrush region, United States Wheat field earthworms under divergent farming systems across a European climate gradient. Ecosystem service indicators on military-managed drylands in the Western United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1