Exploring medical ethics: moral reasoning among new pediatric resident physicians in a tertiary hospital.

Indra A Andrade-Cabrera, Juan Garduño-Espinosa, Gina C Chapa-Koloffon, Mónica J Olguín-Quintero, Maria G Jean-Tron
{"title":"Exploring medical ethics: moral reasoning among new pediatric resident physicians in a tertiary hospital.","authors":"Indra A Andrade-Cabrera, Juan Garduño-Espinosa, Gina C Chapa-Koloffon, Mónica J Olguín-Quintero, Maria G Jean-Tron","doi":"10.24875/BMHIM.24000035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians are frequently faced with ethical dilemmas that require answers based in moral reasoning, which develops and evolves during their lives and their medical education. According to Kohlberg, there are three levels of moral reasoning development: pre-conventional (in which decisions are guided by oneself convenience), conventional (focused on obeying society's rules), and post-conventional (decisions are based in universal ethical principles). The aim of this study was to describe the level of moral reasoning among new pediatric resident physicians in a tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted from 2020 to 2023. The Defining Issues Test was used to assess the level of moral reasoning among 195 new pediatric resident physicians in a tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most resident physicians considered the fourth stage affirmations to be the most important. The median P-index (PI) was 40, and 49% of participants were on the post-conventional level of moral reasoning. The year with the lowest number of new resident physicians on the post-conventional level was 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The moral reasoning level among pediatric resident physicians was higher than the average found in general population. This suggests that the education received during the medical formation may influence the individuals' moral development.</p>","PeriodicalId":9103,"journal":{"name":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","volume":"81 5","pages":"294-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/BMHIM.24000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physicians are frequently faced with ethical dilemmas that require answers based in moral reasoning, which develops and evolves during their lives and their medical education. According to Kohlberg, there are three levels of moral reasoning development: pre-conventional (in which decisions are guided by oneself convenience), conventional (focused on obeying society's rules), and post-conventional (decisions are based in universal ethical principles). The aim of this study was to describe the level of moral reasoning among new pediatric resident physicians in a tertiary hospital.

Method: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted from 2020 to 2023. The Defining Issues Test was used to assess the level of moral reasoning among 195 new pediatric resident physicians in a tertiary hospital.

Results: Most resident physicians considered the fourth stage affirmations to be the most important. The median P-index (PI) was 40, and 49% of participants were on the post-conventional level of moral reasoning. The year with the lowest number of new resident physicians on the post-conventional level was 2021.

Conclusion: The moral reasoning level among pediatric resident physicians was higher than the average found in general population. This suggests that the education received during the medical formation may influence the individuals' moral development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索医学伦理:一家三级医院新任儿科住院医师的道德推理。
背景:医生经常面临道德困境,需要基于道德推理的答案,而道德推理在医生的生活和医学教育中不断发展和演变。根据科尔伯格(Kohlberg)的观点,道德推理的发展分为三个层次:前常规(根据自己的方便做出决定)、常规(侧重于遵守社会规则)和后常规(根据普遍的道德原则做出决定)。本研究旨在描述一家三级医院新任儿科住院医师的道德推理水平:这项横断面描述性研究于 2020 年至 2023 年进行。方法:这项横断面描述性研究于 2020 年至 2023 年进行,采用定义问题测试法评估一家三级医院 195 名新儿科住院医师的道德推理水平:大多数住院医师认为第四阶段的肯定是最重要的。P指数(PI)的中位数为40,49%的参与者处于道德推理的后常规水平。处于后常规水平的新住院医师人数最少的年份是 2021 年:儿科住院医师的道德推理水平高于普通人群的平均水平。结论:儿科住院医师的道德推理水平高于普通人群的平均水平,这表明医学教育可能会影响个人的道德发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México is a bimonthly publication edited by the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. It receives unpublished manuscripts, in English or Spanish, relating to paediatrics in the following areas: biomedicine, clinical, public health, clinical epidemology, health education and clinical ethics. Articles can be original research articles, in-depth or systematic reviews, clinical cases, clinical-pathological cases, articles about public health, letters to the editor or editorials (by invitation).
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgments to reviewers 2023. Analysis of the changes in the management of preterm newborns born in a Spanish third-level hospital in the past 10 years. Changes in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit statistics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comparison between the KARVI scale and the Child Development Evaluation test (EDI) as a screening tool for suspected neurodevelopmental delay. Dietary patterns of Sonoran breastfeeding women are associated to exclusive or partial breastfeeding regimes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1