Tinnitus Suppression with Electrical Stimulation at the Most Basal Contact of the Cochlear Implant Electrode as a Model for Round Window Stimulation.

Kiana Kheirkhah, Valerie Van Kelecom, Marc Leblans, Joost van Dinther, Glynnis De Greve, Erwin Offeciers, Andrzej Zarowski
{"title":"Tinnitus Suppression with Electrical Stimulation at the Most Basal Contact of the Cochlear Implant Electrode as a Model for Round Window Stimulation.","authors":"Kiana Kheirkhah, Valerie Van Kelecom, Marc Leblans, Joost van Dinther, Glynnis De Greve, Erwin Offeciers, Andrzej Zarowski","doi":"10.5152/iao.2024.241576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this research was to test whether efficient tinnitus suppression could be achieved by electrical stimulation of the single most basal electrode contact of a cochlear implant. This approach simulates the effects of electrical stimulation using a round-window electrode. The study was performed in 10 adult cochlear implant patients showing complete or almost complete tinnitus suppression during electrical stimulation with their standard fitting-MAP. In all patients, tinnitus appeared again when the implant was switched off. Five Nucleus implant (1 CI532, 4 CI24RE CA) users and 5 Mi12xx series with FLEX28 electrodes with at least 6 months of CI experience were included. Two types of stimulation were presented at the most basal CI contact: a constant pulse train and a modulated pulse train. The variation in pulse rates was low rate (100-300 pps) and high (≥900 pps), and the current level ranged from the C-level to less than the T-level for both stimulation types. The effect of acute electrical stimulation at the most basal electrode contact was compared to the effect obtained with multichannel stimulation with the patient's current fitting MAP. Electrical stimulation was paused between tests with different stimulation types until tinnitus returned to baseline intensity. Patients reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for tinnitus loudness and intrusiveness during normal CI use and for each single contact stimulation type. Eight participants perceived complete suppression with one or more stimulation patterns. In 2 patients, suppression was less efficient than full-band CI stimulation. Louder stimuli are generally perceived as annoying and less effective in reducing tinnitus. In FLEX28 patients, it was also possible to obtain full tinnitus suppression with current amplitudes under the thresholds for auditory perception (this was not tested in patients with the Nucleus device). In 8 of the 10 included patients, we were able to obtain complete or almost complete tinnitus suppression with electrical stimulation at only 1 most basal electrode contact. Therefore, round-window stimulation with a single electrode may be a potential treatment for tinnitus in patients with significant residual hearing. The long-term effects of this therapy should be confirmed in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"20 5","pages":"390-396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2024.241576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this research was to test whether efficient tinnitus suppression could be achieved by electrical stimulation of the single most basal electrode contact of a cochlear implant. This approach simulates the effects of electrical stimulation using a round-window electrode. The study was performed in 10 adult cochlear implant patients showing complete or almost complete tinnitus suppression during electrical stimulation with their standard fitting-MAP. In all patients, tinnitus appeared again when the implant was switched off. Five Nucleus implant (1 CI532, 4 CI24RE CA) users and 5 Mi12xx series with FLEX28 electrodes with at least 6 months of CI experience were included. Two types of stimulation were presented at the most basal CI contact: a constant pulse train and a modulated pulse train. The variation in pulse rates was low rate (100-300 pps) and high (≥900 pps), and the current level ranged from the C-level to less than the T-level for both stimulation types. The effect of acute electrical stimulation at the most basal electrode contact was compared to the effect obtained with multichannel stimulation with the patient's current fitting MAP. Electrical stimulation was paused between tests with different stimulation types until tinnitus returned to baseline intensity. Patients reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for tinnitus loudness and intrusiveness during normal CI use and for each single contact stimulation type. Eight participants perceived complete suppression with one or more stimulation patterns. In 2 patients, suppression was less efficient than full-band CI stimulation. Louder stimuli are generally perceived as annoying and less effective in reducing tinnitus. In FLEX28 patients, it was also possible to obtain full tinnitus suppression with current amplitudes under the thresholds for auditory perception (this was not tested in patients with the Nucleus device). In 8 of the 10 included patients, we were able to obtain complete or almost complete tinnitus suppression with electrical stimulation at only 1 most basal electrode contact. Therefore, round-window stimulation with a single electrode may be a potential treatment for tinnitus in patients with significant residual hearing. The long-term effects of this therapy should be confirmed in future studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以耳蜗植入电极最基底触点的电刺激抑制耳鸣作为圆窗刺激的模型。
这项研究的目的是测试是否可以通过对人工耳蜗最基底的单个电极接触点进行电刺激来有效抑制耳鸣。这种方法模拟了使用圆窗电极进行电刺激的效果。这项研究针对 10 名成年人工耳蜗植入者,他们在使用标准适配 MAP 进行电刺激时,耳鸣完全或几乎完全被抑制。在所有患者中,当植入体关闭时,耳鸣再次出现。五名 "纽核力 "植入体(1 名 CI532、4 名 CI24RE CA)使用者和五名使用 FLEX28 电极的 Mi12xx 系列植入体使用者均具有至少 6 个月的人工耳蜗植入经验。在最基本的 CI 接触点上提供了两种类型的刺激:恒定脉冲串和调制脉冲串。两种刺激方式的脉冲频率有低速率(100-300 pps)和高速率(≥900 pps)之分,电流水平从 C 级到低于 T 级不等。在最基底电极接触处进行急性电刺激的效果与患者电流拟合 MAP 的多通道刺激效果进行了比较。在不同刺激类型的测试之间暂停电刺激,直到耳鸣恢复到基线强度。患者报告了在正常使用人工耳蜗和每种单触点刺激类型时耳鸣响度和干扰度的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。八名患者认为一种或多种刺激模式可完全抑制耳鸣。在两名患者中,抑制效果不如全频段 CI 刺激。大音量刺激通常被认为是恼人的,对减轻耳鸣的效果较差。在 FLEX28 患者中,电流振幅低于听觉阈值时也能完全抑制耳鸣(使用 Nucleus 设备的患者未进行过测试)。在 10 名患者中,有 8 名患者仅在 1 个最基底电极接触处接受电刺激,就能获得完全或几乎完全的耳鸣抑制。因此,单电极圆窗刺激可能是治疗听力严重残余患者耳鸣的一种潜在方法。这种疗法的长期效果应在今后的研究中加以证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An International Survey of the Diagnosis and Management of Ménière's Disease Amongst Otolaryngology Consultants. Associations of Blood Lipids with the Risk and Prognosis of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Meta-analysis. Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence. Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence. Constant Dizziness Versus Episodic Vertigo in Ménière's Disease: Health-Related Quality of Life, Cognitive Dissonance, and Postural Problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1