Nourishing Farm to School Practice With Data to Inform Program Needs: An Evaluation of Participation Among California Public Districts During the 2018-2019 School Year.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jand.2024.10.006
Lynnea M LoPresto, Julie H T Dang, Melanie S Dove
{"title":"Nourishing Farm to School Practice With Data to Inform Program Needs: An Evaluation of Participation Among California Public Districts During the 2018-2019 School Year.","authors":"Lynnea M LoPresto, Julie H T Dang, Melanie S Dove","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The US Department of Agriculture promotes farm to school (F2S) as an evidence-based approach to help school meals meet updated nutrition standards that promote health. California is a key agricultural state with strong support for F2S to promote local agriculture and equitable access to nutritious food for all students.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine district characteristics associated with F2S participation among California public districts during the 2018-2019 school year.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional evaluation of 2019 US Department of Agriculture Farm to School Census data.</p><p><strong>Participants/setting: </strong>California public districts responding to the 2019 US Department of Agriculture F2S Census (N = 572).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Reported participation in F2S activities in 2018-2019. Covariates included district size, annual per-pupil spending, urbanicity, racial/ethnic composition, and percent free and reduced-price meal (% FRPM) eligibility.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Descriptive statistics (unweighted frequency and weighted percent) were reported for demographic characteristics. Weighted, multiple logistic regression assessed associations between demographic characteristics and F2S participation, reported as odds ratios (95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly 78% of California respondents reported F2S participation. Top activities were serving local food in school lunch (73%) and breakfast (65%) and local food promotion at school (45.5%). The odds of participation among districts with enrollments ≥1000 were 1.79 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.79) times higher than smaller districts and 1.57 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.28) times higher in districts with lower annual per-pupil spending (≤$13 707). No significant differences were found by racial/ethnic composition, % FRPM eligibility, or urbanicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities in F2S participation exist for small districts and those with high annual per-pupil spending that may lack the advantages of economies of scale. Grant incentives and support networks for these groups are recommended along with increased monitoring focused on the quality of F2S engagement. Administration of a brief annual state F2S Census could support more timely monitoring and accountability to align with state goals and improve opportunities for data sharing and community engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2024.10.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The US Department of Agriculture promotes farm to school (F2S) as an evidence-based approach to help school meals meet updated nutrition standards that promote health. California is a key agricultural state with strong support for F2S to promote local agriculture and equitable access to nutritious food for all students.

Objective: Examine district characteristics associated with F2S participation among California public districts during the 2018-2019 school year.

Design: Cross-sectional evaluation of 2019 US Department of Agriculture Farm to School Census data.

Participants/setting: California public districts responding to the 2019 US Department of Agriculture F2S Census (N = 572).

Main outcome measure: Reported participation in F2S activities in 2018-2019. Covariates included district size, annual per-pupil spending, urbanicity, racial/ethnic composition, and percent free and reduced-price meal (% FRPM) eligibility.

Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics (unweighted frequency and weighted percent) were reported for demographic characteristics. Weighted, multiple logistic regression assessed associations between demographic characteristics and F2S participation, reported as odds ratios (95% CI).

Results: Nearly 78% of California respondents reported F2S participation. Top activities were serving local food in school lunch (73%) and breakfast (65%) and local food promotion at school (45.5%). The odds of participation among districts with enrollments ≥1000 were 1.79 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.79) times higher than smaller districts and 1.57 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.28) times higher in districts with lower annual per-pupil spending (≤$13 707). No significant differences were found by racial/ethnic composition, % FRPM eligibility, or urbanicity.

Conclusions: Disparities in F2S participation exist for small districts and those with high annual per-pupil spending that may lack the advantages of economies of scale. Grant incentives and support networks for these groups are recommended along with increased monitoring focused on the quality of F2S engagement. Administration of a brief annual state F2S Census could support more timely monitoring and accountability to align with state goals and improve opportunities for data sharing and community engagement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用数据滋养 "农场到学校 "实践,为计划需求提供信息:对 2018-19 学年加州公立学校参与情况的评估。
背景:美国农业部提倡 "农场到学校"(F2S),将其作为一种循证方法,帮助学校膳食达到促进健康的最新营养标准。加利福尼亚州(California,CA)是一个重要的农业州,大力支持 F2S,以促进当地农业发展和所有学生公平获得营养食品:在 2018-19 学年期间,考察与加利福尼亚州公立学区参与 F2S 相关的学区特征:对 2019 年美国农业部农场到学校普查数据进行横截面评估:主要结果测量:报告的 2018-19 年 F2S 活动参与情况。协变量包括学区规模、年度学生人均支出、城市化程度、种族/民族构成以及免费和减价膳食百分比(% FRPM)资格:对人口统计特征进行了描述性统计(非加权频率、加权百分比)。加权多元逻辑回归评估了人口统计学特征与 F2S 参与度之间的关联,以 OR(95% CI)表示:近 78% 的加州受访者报告参与了 F2S 活动。最主要的活动是在学校午餐(73%)和早餐(65%)中提供本地食品,以及在学校推广本地食品(45.5%)。入学人数超过 1,000 人的地区的参与几率是较小地区的 1.79(1.15-2.79)倍,是年人均支出较低(< 13,707 美元)地区的 1.57(1.08-2.28)倍。在种族/民族构成、FRPM 资格百分比或城市化程度方面没有发现明显差异:小地区和年人均支出高的地区在参与 F2S 方面存在差异,这些地区可能缺乏规模经济的优势。建议为这些群体提供补助奖励和支持网络,同时加强监督,重点关注 F2S 参与的质量。管理简短的年度州级 "家庭对学校 "普查可以支持更及时的监测和问责,以与州目标保持一致,并增加数据共享和社区参与的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
649
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.
期刊最新文献
Skin Carotenoids Measured by Reflection Spectroscopy Correlates with Vegetable Intake Frequency in Adolescents of Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Houston, Texas. Authors' Response. Response to "Association Between Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Chronic Insomnia in the NutriNet-Santé Study". Mindful eating and diet quality among U.S. adults with lower incomes. The relationship between perceived discrimination and reported nutrient intake among pregnant individuals of minoritized racial and ethnic groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1