A decomposition of partisan advantage in electoral district maps

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Electoral Studies Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102871
Jeffrey T. Barton , Jon X. Eguia
{"title":"A decomposition of partisan advantage in electoral district maps","authors":"Jeffrey T. Barton ,&nbsp;Jon X. Eguia","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We propose a framework to decompose the partisan advantage in a map of electoral districts into four contributing factors: the fairness notion used to evaluate the map, political geography, rules on redistricting criteria that the map must meet, and the discretionary choice of which specific map to adopt. We apply this factor decomposition to the 2021–22 U.S. congressional district map in each state. Such a decomposition can distinguish maps with large partisan advantages that reflect a non-partisan underlying cause, from gerrymandered maps in which the advantage is attributable to the deliberate partisan choices of map-makers, such as the pro-Republican maps in Florida and Texas, or the pro-Democratic map in Illinois.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 102871"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electoral Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026137942400129X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose a framework to decompose the partisan advantage in a map of electoral districts into four contributing factors: the fairness notion used to evaluate the map, political geography, rules on redistricting criteria that the map must meet, and the discretionary choice of which specific map to adopt. We apply this factor decomposition to the 2021–22 U.S. congressional district map in each state. Such a decomposition can distinguish maps with large partisan advantages that reflect a non-partisan underlying cause, from gerrymandered maps in which the advantage is attributable to the deliberate partisan choices of map-makers, such as the pro-Republican maps in Florida and Texas, or the pro-Democratic map in Illinois.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选区地图中党派优势的分解
我们提出了一个框架,将选区地图中的党派优势分解为四个促成因素:用于评估地图的公平性概念、政治地理、地图必须满足的重划标准规则,以及采用哪张具体地图的自由裁量选择。我们将这一因素分解应用于各州的 2021-22 年美国国会选区地图。这种分解方法可以将具有较大党派优势但反映了非党派根本原因的地图,与由于地图绘制者的蓄意党派选择而产生优势的选区划分地图区分开来,如佛罗里达州和得克萨斯州的亲共和党地图,或伊利诺伊州的亲民主党地图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electoral Studies
Electoral Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Electoral Studies is an international journal covering all aspects of voting, the central act in the democratic process. Political scientists, economists, sociologists, game theorists, geographers, contemporary historians and lawyers have common, and overlapping, interests in what causes voters to act as they do, and the consequences. Electoral Studies provides a forum for these diverse approaches. It publishes fully refereed papers, both theoretical and empirical, on such topics as relationships between votes and seats, and between election outcomes and politicians reactions; historical, sociological, or geographical correlates of voting behaviour; rational choice analysis of political acts, and critiques of such analyses.
期刊最新文献
Economic growth, largest-party vote shares, and electoral authoritarianism Targeting voters online: How parties’ campaigns differ Masking turnout inequality. Invalid voting and class bias when compulsory voting is reinstated Does decentralization boost electoral participation? Revisiting the question in a non-western context The populist impulse: Cognitive reflection, populist attitudes and candidate preferences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1