EFFECTS OF IMMEDIATE POSTPARTUM USE OF INJECTABLE CONTRACEPTION ON HUMAN MILK FEEDING

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110574
MF Gallo, FL Schumacher, M Lawley, S Keim, L Keder
{"title":"EFFECTS OF IMMEDIATE POSTPARTUM USE OF INJECTABLE CONTRACEPTION ON HUMAN MILK FEEDING","authors":"MF Gallo,&nbsp;FL Schumacher,&nbsp;M Lawley,&nbsp;S Keim,&nbsp;L Keder","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>US guidelines permit depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) use among people intending to feed their infant with their milk. However, DMPA use is often restricted in practice due to lack of high-quality evidence. We evaluated the effect of immediate postpartum DMPA use on the timing of lactogenesis stage-II (LS=II).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The initial design randomly assigned adults who delivered a full-term infant in 2019-2021 to receive within 48 hours of delivery: DMPA, placebo injection, or no injection. Due to low enrollment, we changed in 2021-2023 to a non-randomized design using propensity score weighting for analysis and balancing recruitment for obesity and delivery method. Here, we combined data from both designs to compare immediate postpartum DMPA use (n=55) vs. control arm (n=95). We defined noninferiority <em>a priori</em> as being met if the upper bound of a two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean difference in time to LS-II between the immediate DMPA and control groups was &lt;6 hours.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the unweighted analysis, the mean time to LS-II was 57.8 hours in the DMPA arm (SD=29.4) and 64.1 hours in the control arm (SD=36.1). Using propensity score weighting to make the arms comparable with respect to age, race, and gravidity, we found that the mean time to LS-II was 5.4 hours shorter (95% CI, -16.3, 5.4) for women in the DMPA relative to control arm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found no evidence that DMPA use inhibits the initiation of LS-II. Our findings support the immediate postpartum use of DMPA among those intending to engage in human milk feeding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424002695","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

US guidelines permit depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) use among people intending to feed their infant with their milk. However, DMPA use is often restricted in practice due to lack of high-quality evidence. We evaluated the effect of immediate postpartum DMPA use on the timing of lactogenesis stage-II (LS=II).

Methods

The initial design randomly assigned adults who delivered a full-term infant in 2019-2021 to receive within 48 hours of delivery: DMPA, placebo injection, or no injection. Due to low enrollment, we changed in 2021-2023 to a non-randomized design using propensity score weighting for analysis and balancing recruitment for obesity and delivery method. Here, we combined data from both designs to compare immediate postpartum DMPA use (n=55) vs. control arm (n=95). We defined noninferiority a priori as being met if the upper bound of a two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean difference in time to LS-II between the immediate DMPA and control groups was <6 hours.

Results

In the unweighted analysis, the mean time to LS-II was 57.8 hours in the DMPA arm (SD=29.4) and 64.1 hours in the control arm (SD=36.1). Using propensity score weighting to make the arms comparable with respect to age, race, and gravidity, we found that the mean time to LS-II was 5.4 hours shorter (95% CI, -16.3, 5.4) for women in the DMPA relative to control arm.

Conclusions

We found no evidence that DMPA use inhibits the initiation of LS-II. Our findings support the immediate postpartum use of DMPA among those intending to engage in human milk feeding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产后立即使用注射避孕药对母乳喂养的影响
目标 美国的指南允许打算用母乳喂养婴儿的人使用醋酸甲羟孕酮去甲肾上腺素(DMPA)。然而,由于缺乏高质量的证据,DMPA 的使用在实践中往往受到限制。我们评估了产后立即使用DMPA对泌乳发生第二阶段(LS=II)时间的影响。方法最初的设计是随机分配在2019-2021年分娩足月婴儿的成人,让他们在分娩后48小时内接受DMPA、安慰剂注射,或在分娩后48小时内接受DMPA注射:DMPA、安慰剂注射或不注射。由于注册人数较少,我们在 2021-2023 年改为非随机设计,使用倾向得分加权进行分析,并平衡肥胖和分娩方式的招募。在此,我们综合了两种设计的数据,对产后立即使用 DMPA(55 人)与对照组(95 人)进行了比较。结果在未加权分析中,DMPA组到LS-II的平均时间为57.8小时(SD=29.4),对照组为64.1小时(SD=36.1)。利用倾向得分加权法使两组在年龄、种族和孕产期方面具有可比性,我们发现 DMPA 组妇女的 LS-II 平均时间比对照组缩短了 5.4 小时(95% CI,-16.3,5.4)。我们的研究结果支持有意进行母乳喂养的妇女在产后立即使用 DMPA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Featured research at the 2024 Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting 2024 IMPROVING CARE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH HIGHER BODY MASS INDEX (BMI) UNDERGOING INDUCTION TERMINATION FULFILLING AN UNMET NEED: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES ON INTEGRATING FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES INTO OFFICE-BASED ADDICTION THERAPY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1