TRENDS IN OUT-OF-STATE ABORTIONS IN OREGON FOLLOWING THE DOBBS COURT DECISION

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110571
M Fuerst, A Mandelbaum, E Nacev, M Rodriguez
{"title":"TRENDS IN OUT-OF-STATE ABORTIONS IN OREGON FOLLOWING THE DOBBS COURT DECISION","authors":"M Fuerst,&nbsp;A Mandelbaum,&nbsp;E Nacev,&nbsp;M Rodriguez","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study looks at how out-of-state travel for abortion care changed in the state of Oregon following the <em>Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization</em> decision on June 24, 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a cross-sectional study using data from the Oregon Health Authority (OHA), which collects information on all abortions performed in Oregon. Our sample included all medication and procedural abortions between January 1, 2015 and September 30, 2023. For the post-<em>Dobbs</em> cohort, we compared in-state with out-of-state residents using standard bivariate analyses. We then conducted an interrupted time series analysis to trend the proportion of out-of-state residents following <em>Dobbs</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our sample included 66,253 abortions. In the post-<em>Dobbs</em> cohort, out-of-state residents were significantly more likely to have a procedural vs. a medication abortion (51.65% vs. 46.7%) and be at higher gestational ages at the time of their procedure. Our ITS analysis estimated that the number of out-of-state residents would increase by 2.61% (95% CI, 1.2–3.93%). After <em>Dobbs,</em> out-of-state residents came to Oregon from 24 US states with a wide geographical spread.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The <em>Dobbs</em> decision increased the proportion of individuals traveling from out-of-state to Oregon for abortion care. These individuals were more likely to have a procedural abortion and to be at more advanced gestational ages. As the post-<em>Roe v Wade</em> abortion landscape continues to evolve, it is important to understand the demographics and needs of those traveling for abortion care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001078242400266X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study looks at how out-of-state travel for abortion care changed in the state of Oregon following the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision on June 24, 2022.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study using data from the Oregon Health Authority (OHA), which collects information on all abortions performed in Oregon. Our sample included all medication and procedural abortions between January 1, 2015 and September 30, 2023. For the post-Dobbs cohort, we compared in-state with out-of-state residents using standard bivariate analyses. We then conducted an interrupted time series analysis to trend the proportion of out-of-state residents following Dobbs.

Results

Our sample included 66,253 abortions. In the post-Dobbs cohort, out-of-state residents were significantly more likely to have a procedural vs. a medication abortion (51.65% vs. 46.7%) and be at higher gestational ages at the time of their procedure. Our ITS analysis estimated that the number of out-of-state residents would increase by 2.61% (95% CI, 1.2–3.93%). After Dobbs, out-of-state residents came to Oregon from 24 US states with a wide geographical spread.

Conclusions

The Dobbs decision increased the proportion of individuals traveling from out-of-state to Oregon for abortion care. These individuals were more likely to have a procedural abortion and to be at more advanced gestational ages. As the post-Roe v Wade abortion landscape continues to evolve, it is important to understand the demographics and needs of those traveling for abortion care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多布斯法院判决后俄勒冈州外堕胎的趋势
本研究探讨了在 2022 年 6 月 24 日 Dobbs 诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案判决后,俄勒冈州州外堕胎护理旅行发生了哪些变化。我们的样本包括 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 9 月 30 日期间的所有药物流产和程序流产。对于后多布斯队列,我们使用标准的双变量分析比较了州内和州外居民。然后,我们进行了中断时间序列分析,以确定多布斯之后州外居民的比例趋势。在后多布斯队列中,州外居民进行程序性流产的可能性明显高于药物流产(51.65% 对 46.7%),并且在进行程序性流产时的妊娠年龄也更高。我们的 ITS 分析估计,州外居民的数量将增加 2.61%(95% CI,1.2-3.93%)。结论多布斯决定增加了从外州前往俄勒冈州接受堕胎护理的人数比例。这些人更有可能进行程序性流产,而且妊娠年龄更大。随着 "罗伊诉韦德案 "后人工流产形势的不断发展,了解前往俄勒冈州接受人工流产护理的人群特征和需求非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Featured research at the 2024 Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting 2024 IMPROVING CARE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH HIGHER BODY MASS INDEX (BMI) UNDERGOING INDUCTION TERMINATION FULFILLING AN UNMET NEED: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES ON INTEGRATING FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES INTO OFFICE-BASED ADDICTION THERAPY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1