KNOWLEDGE OF MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION INSTRUCTIONS AMONG TRADITIONAL MEDICATION ABORTION PATIENTS

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110602
TX Chen, R Soon, M Tschann
{"title":"KNOWLEDGE OF MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION INSTRUCTIONS AMONG TRADITIONAL MEDICATION ABORTION PATIENTS","authors":"TX Chen,&nbsp;R Soon,&nbsp;M Tschann","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to evaluate patients’ immediate recall of medication abortion administration instructions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a descriptive analysis of one cohort in a prospective non-inferiority study. We surveyed a convenience sample of medication abortion patients immediately after their appointment in Honolulu, HI between April 2023 and March 2024. Surveys assessed knowledge of medication abortion indications/contraindications, administration, and side effects/precautions, as well as their confidence in correctly completing the regimen. Incidentally, the clinic modified its written instructions for readability approximately halfway through recruitment; we compared outcomes before and after modification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We surveyed 100 patients. Mean age was 27.9 years (SD, 6.6). Thirty-two (32%) had undergone a medication abortion before. On average, patients correctly answered 79% (SD, 18%) of questions about medication abortion indications/contraindications, 97% (SD, 8.3%) of questions about medication regimen administration, and 93% (SD, 11%) of questions about side effects/precautions; the overall average number of correct answers for all questions was 90% (SD, 7.7%). Patients were completely or quite confident they could independently complete the process (n=95, 95%), teach a friend how to complete the process (n=86, 86%), recognize side effects (n=84, 84%), and seek emergency help when needed (n=95, 95%). Patient age, history of medication abortion, and the new medication abortion instructions were not associated with more accurate recall or higher confidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings may be a foundation for future studies that seek to compare the medication abortion knowledge and confidence of patients who pursue medication abortion outside of the clinic setting, such as advance provision or self-managed abortion, with that of traditional patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001078242400297X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate patients’ immediate recall of medication abortion administration instructions.

Methods

This is a descriptive analysis of one cohort in a prospective non-inferiority study. We surveyed a convenience sample of medication abortion patients immediately after their appointment in Honolulu, HI between April 2023 and March 2024. Surveys assessed knowledge of medication abortion indications/contraindications, administration, and side effects/precautions, as well as their confidence in correctly completing the regimen. Incidentally, the clinic modified its written instructions for readability approximately halfway through recruitment; we compared outcomes before and after modification.

Results

We surveyed 100 patients. Mean age was 27.9 years (SD, 6.6). Thirty-two (32%) had undergone a medication abortion before. On average, patients correctly answered 79% (SD, 18%) of questions about medication abortion indications/contraindications, 97% (SD, 8.3%) of questions about medication regimen administration, and 93% (SD, 11%) of questions about side effects/precautions; the overall average number of correct answers for all questions was 90% (SD, 7.7%). Patients were completely or quite confident they could independently complete the process (n=95, 95%), teach a friend how to complete the process (n=86, 86%), recognize side effects (n=84, 84%), and seek emergency help when needed (n=95, 95%). Patient age, history of medication abortion, and the new medication abortion instructions were not associated with more accurate recall or higher confidence.

Conclusions

These findings may be a foundation for future studies that seek to compare the medication abortion knowledge and confidence of patients who pursue medication abortion outside of the clinic setting, such as advance provision or self-managed abortion, with that of traditional patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统药物流产患者对用药指导的了解情况
方法 这是一项前瞻性非劣效性研究中一个队列的描述性分析。我们对 2023 年 4 月至 2024 年 3 月期间在夏威夷州檀香山就诊的药物流产患者进行了方便抽样调查。调查评估了患者对药物流产适应症/禁忌症、用药、副作用/注意事项的了解程度,以及对正确完成疗程的信心。顺便提一下,在招募进行到一半时,诊所修改了书面说明以提高可读性;我们对修改前后的结果进行了比较。平均年龄为 27.9 岁(SD,6.6)。32人(32%)曾接受过药物流产。平均而言,患者正确回答了 79% (SD, 18%) 有关药物流产适应症/禁忌症的问题、97% (SD, 8.3%) 有关用药方案的问题以及 93% (SD, 11%) 有关副作用/注意事项的问题;所有问题的总平均正确率为 90% (SD, 7.7%)。患者完全或相当有信心能够独立完成这一过程(95%,n=95)、教会朋友完成这一过程(86%,n=86)、识别副作用(84%,n=84)以及在需要时寻求紧急帮助(95%,n=95)。患者年龄、药物流产史和新的药物流产说明与更准确的回忆或更高的信心并无关联。结论这些发现可为今后的研究奠定基础,这些研究旨在比较在诊所环境外进行药物流产(如提前提供或自我管理流产)的患者与传统患者的药物流产知识和信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Featured research at the 2024 Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting 2024 IMPROVING CARE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH HIGHER BODY MASS INDEX (BMI) UNDERGOING INDUCTION TERMINATION FULFILLING AN UNMET NEED: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES ON INTEGRATING FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES INTO OFFICE-BASED ADDICTION THERAPY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1