Mapping pathways to responsible innovation: Configurations of digital economy, effectuation, and firm size in SMEs—A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123778
Liangxing He , Jianwen Zheng , Meijuan Zhao , Teng Li
{"title":"Mapping pathways to responsible innovation: Configurations of digital economy, effectuation, and firm size in SMEs—A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis","authors":"Liangxing He ,&nbsp;Jianwen Zheng ,&nbsp;Meijuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Teng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital technology has indubitably brought significant benefits, but has also triggered a series of social problems. Consequently, responsible innovation (RI) is essential to address these social concerns, and exploring mechanisms for corporations to achieve RI in the digital economy is urgently required. This study investigates the assessment of RI by 105 managers of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) using a tracking survey and employs fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to uncover the various paths through which different principles of effectuation drive corporate RI. The findings indicate that digital-type, alliance-type, and larger firm exploratory-type contingent-driven configurations play equifinal roles in promoting corporate RI. While corporations remain contingent, they need to adopt different paths to achieve RI based on the digital economy environment and their own size. This study contributes to the literature on RI in three ways. First, it extends the research context of existing literature by incorporating the digital economy. Second, it provides new theoretical insights for RI by using different configurations to show the multiple paths corporations can take to achieve RI in the digital economy. Third, by using effectual principles as an intermediate path to bridge the digital economy and RI, this research expands the application scope of effectual principles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 123778"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005766","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital technology has indubitably brought significant benefits, but has also triggered a series of social problems. Consequently, responsible innovation (RI) is essential to address these social concerns, and exploring mechanisms for corporations to achieve RI in the digital economy is urgently required. This study investigates the assessment of RI by 105 managers of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) using a tracking survey and employs fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to uncover the various paths through which different principles of effectuation drive corporate RI. The findings indicate that digital-type, alliance-type, and larger firm exploratory-type contingent-driven configurations play equifinal roles in promoting corporate RI. While corporations remain contingent, they need to adopt different paths to achieve RI based on the digital economy environment and their own size. This study contributes to the literature on RI in three ways. First, it extends the research context of existing literature by incorporating the digital economy. Second, it provides new theoretical insights for RI by using different configurations to show the multiple paths corporations can take to achieve RI in the digital economy. Third, by using effectual principles as an intermediate path to bridge the digital economy and RI, this research expands the application scope of effectual principles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制负责任创新之路:中小企业数字经济、效应和企业规模的配置--模糊集定性比较分析
数字技术无疑带来了巨大的利益,但也引发了一系列社会问题。因此,负责任的创新(RI)对于解决这些社会问题至关重要,而探索企业在数字经济时代实现 RI 的机制也迫在眉睫。本研究采用跟踪调查的方法,调查了 105 位中小企业(SMEs)经理人对责任创新的评估,并采用模糊集定性比较分析法,揭示了不同的生效原则推动企业责任创新的各种路径。研究结果表明,数字型、联盟型和大型企业探索型的权变驱动配置在促进企业 RI 方面发挥着同等作用。虽然企业仍然具有偶然性,但它们需要根据数字经济环境和自身规模采取不同的路径来实现 RI。本研究从三个方面对有关 RI 的文献做出了贡献。首先,它将数字经济纳入其中,扩展了现有文献的研究范围。其次,通过使用不同的配置来展示企业在数字经济中实现 RI 的多种途径,为 RI 提供了新的理论见解。第三,本研究通过使用效应原则作为连接数字经济和 RI 的中间路径,扩大了效应原则的应用范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Roles of related and unrelated external technologies in shaping regional breakthrough technological advantages Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty? Understanding service robot adoption and resistance from a service provider perspective Examining trust in cryptocurrency investment: Insights from the structural equation modeling Enabling a viable circular ecosystem for electric vehicle batteries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1