Mapping pathways to responsible innovation: Configurations of digital economy, effectuation, and firm size in SMEs—A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis
Liangxing He , Jianwen Zheng , Meijuan Zhao , Teng Li
{"title":"Mapping pathways to responsible innovation: Configurations of digital economy, effectuation, and firm size in SMEs—A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis","authors":"Liangxing He , Jianwen Zheng , Meijuan Zhao , Teng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital technology has indubitably brought significant benefits, but has also triggered a series of social problems. Consequently, responsible innovation (RI) is essential to address these social concerns, and exploring mechanisms for corporations to achieve RI in the digital economy is urgently required. This study investigates the assessment of RI by 105 managers of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) using a tracking survey and employs fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to uncover the various paths through which different principles of effectuation drive corporate RI. The findings indicate that digital-type, alliance-type, and larger firm exploratory-type contingent-driven configurations play equifinal roles in promoting corporate RI. While corporations remain contingent, they need to adopt different paths to achieve RI based on the digital economy environment and their own size. This study contributes to the literature on RI in three ways. First, it extends the research context of existing literature by incorporating the digital economy. Second, it provides new theoretical insights for RI by using different configurations to show the multiple paths corporations can take to achieve RI in the digital economy. Third, by using effectual principles as an intermediate path to bridge the digital economy and RI, this research expands the application scope of effectual principles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 123778"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005766","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Digital technology has indubitably brought significant benefits, but has also triggered a series of social problems. Consequently, responsible innovation (RI) is essential to address these social concerns, and exploring mechanisms for corporations to achieve RI in the digital economy is urgently required. This study investigates the assessment of RI by 105 managers of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) using a tracking survey and employs fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to uncover the various paths through which different principles of effectuation drive corporate RI. The findings indicate that digital-type, alliance-type, and larger firm exploratory-type contingent-driven configurations play equifinal roles in promoting corporate RI. While corporations remain contingent, they need to adopt different paths to achieve RI based on the digital economy environment and their own size. This study contributes to the literature on RI in three ways. First, it extends the research context of existing literature by incorporating the digital economy. Second, it provides new theoretical insights for RI by using different configurations to show the multiple paths corporations can take to achieve RI in the digital economy. Third, by using effectual principles as an intermediate path to bridge the digital economy and RI, this research expands the application scope of effectual principles.
数字技术无疑带来了巨大的利益,但也引发了一系列社会问题。因此,负责任的创新(RI)对于解决这些社会问题至关重要,而探索企业在数字经济时代实现 RI 的机制也迫在眉睫。本研究采用跟踪调查的方法,调查了 105 位中小企业(SMEs)经理人对责任创新的评估,并采用模糊集定性比较分析法,揭示了不同的生效原则推动企业责任创新的各种路径。研究结果表明,数字型、联盟型和大型企业探索型的权变驱动配置在促进企业 RI 方面发挥着同等作用。虽然企业仍然具有偶然性,但它们需要根据数字经济环境和自身规模采取不同的路径来实现 RI。本研究从三个方面对有关 RI 的文献做出了贡献。首先,它将数字经济纳入其中,扩展了现有文献的研究范围。其次,通过使用不同的配置来展示企业在数字经济中实现 RI 的多种途径,为 RI 提供了新的理论见解。第三,本研究通过使用效应原则作为连接数字经济和 RI 的中间路径,扩大了效应原则的应用范围。
期刊介绍:
Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors.
In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.