Prognostic significance of ratio of positive lymph nodes in patients with operable major salivary ductal carcinoma

Medicine Advances Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1002/med4.79
Di Zhang, Lixi Li
{"title":"Prognostic significance of ratio of positive lymph nodes in patients with operable major salivary ductal carcinoma","authors":"Di Zhang,&nbsp;Lixi Li","doi":"10.1002/med4.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Major salivary duct carcinomas (MSDCs) often involve the regional lymph nodes (LNs). However, the clinical value of LN parameters in patients with MSDCs is unclear. We aimed to investigate the optimal cut-off points for number of positive LNs (PLNN) and ratio of positive LNs (PLNRs) and their prognostic value in patients with MSDC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively reviewed relevant data extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database on patients with MSDC who had undergone surgery between 2004 and 2016. The optimal PLNN and positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) cut-off points were identified using the X-tile program. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 290 patients were enrolled, 57.6% of whom had LN metastases. Advanced T stage in the submandibular gland and unpaired lesions were associated with LN involvement. Positive LNs, late T stage, and submandibular gland location were associated with poor overall survival (OS). The 5-year OS rates of patients with negative and positive LNs were 74.3% and 36.5%, respectively. PLNN &gt; 16 and PLNR &gt; 0.48 were the best cut-off points. The 5-year OS of patients with PLNN ≤ 16 and PLNN &gt; 16 was 42.8% and 15.4%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 46.8% for patients with PLNR ≤ 0.48 and 26.3% for patients with PLNR &gt; 0.48. PLNR was a strong prognostic factor for patients with MSDC with LN metastases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>PLNR reflects both the effects of LN dissection and PLNN. Furthermore, its prognostic value in patients with MSDC exceeds that of PLNN. Patients with high PLNRs should be followed closely after surgery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100913,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/med4.79","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/med4.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Major salivary duct carcinomas (MSDCs) often involve the regional lymph nodes (LNs). However, the clinical value of LN parameters in patients with MSDCs is unclear. We aimed to investigate the optimal cut-off points for number of positive LNs (PLNN) and ratio of positive LNs (PLNRs) and their prognostic value in patients with MSDC.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed relevant data extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database on patients with MSDC who had undergone surgery between 2004 and 2016. The optimal PLNN and positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) cut-off points were identified using the X-tile program. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors.

Results

Overall, 290 patients were enrolled, 57.6% of whom had LN metastases. Advanced T stage in the submandibular gland and unpaired lesions were associated with LN involvement. Positive LNs, late T stage, and submandibular gland location were associated with poor overall survival (OS). The 5-year OS rates of patients with negative and positive LNs were 74.3% and 36.5%, respectively. PLNN > 16 and PLNR > 0.48 were the best cut-off points. The 5-year OS of patients with PLNN ≤ 16 and PLNN > 16 was 42.8% and 15.4%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 46.8% for patients with PLNR ≤ 0.48 and 26.3% for patients with PLNR > 0.48. PLNR was a strong prognostic factor for patients with MSDC with LN metastases.

Conclusions

PLNR reflects both the effects of LN dissection and PLNN. Furthermore, its prognostic value in patients with MSDC exceeds that of PLNN. Patients with high PLNRs should be followed closely after surgery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可手术的主要涎腺导管癌患者淋巴结阳性比例的预后意义
背景主要唾液腺导管癌(MSDC)常常累及区域淋巴结(LN)。然而,淋巴结参数在涎管癌患者中的临床价值尚不明确。我们旨在研究阳性淋巴结数量(PLNN)和阳性淋巴结比率(PLNRs)的最佳临界点及其在MSDC患者中的预后价值。 研究设计 回顾性队列。 方法 我们回顾性审查了从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中提取的 2004 年至 2016 年期间接受过手术的 MSDC 患者的相关数据。使用 X-tile 程序确定了最佳 PLNN 和阳性淋巴结比(PLNR)截断点。通过 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 回归分析确定预后因素。 结果 总共有 290 名患者入选,其中 57.6% 有 LN 转移。颌下腺T期晚期和未配对病变与LN受累有关。LN阳性、T分期晚期和颌下腺位置与总生存期(OS)差有关。LN阴性和阳性患者的5年生存率分别为74.3%和36.5%。PLNN>16和PLNR>0.48是最佳截断点。PLNN≤16和PLNN > 16患者的5年OS分别为42.8%和15.4%。PLNR≤0.48的患者的5年OS率为46.8%,PLNR > 0.48的患者的5年OS率为26.3%。PLNR是伴有LN转移的MSDC患者的一个强有力的预后因素。 结论 PLNR同时反映了LN切除和PLNN的影响。此外,PLNR 对 MSDC 患者的预后价值超过 PLNN。PLNR较高的患者术后应密切随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Prognostic significance of ratio of positive lymph nodes in patients with operable major salivary ductal carcinoma Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic education: A comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Bing AI's Orthopaedic In-Training Examination performance Anti-synthetase syndrome complicated by multifocal tuberculosis: A thought-provoking differential diagnosis with tumors Toward bridging gaps in patient navigation: A study on the adoption of artificial intelligence technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1