Clinical Utility of Neurophysiologic Classification (and Declassification) of Myoclonus

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Movement Disorders Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1002/mds.30022
Marcus N. Callister, Molly C. Klanderman, Alyssa Stockard, Charles Van Der Walt, Ashley B. Pena, John N. Caviness
{"title":"Clinical Utility of Neurophysiologic Classification (and Declassification) of Myoclonus","authors":"Marcus N. Callister, Molly C. Klanderman, Alyssa Stockard, Charles Van Der Walt, Ashley B. Pena, John N. Caviness","doi":"10.1002/mds.30022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundMovement clinical neurophysiology studies can distinguish myoclonus, tremor, and other jerky movements; however, there has been limited demonstration of their real‐world clinical impact.ObjectiveThe aim was to investigate movement study utility in clarifying movement classification and guiding patient management.MethodA retrospective study of myoclonus‐related movement studies was performed.ResultsOf 262 patients referred for consideration of myoclonus, 105 (40%) had myoclonus, 156 (59%) had no myoclonus (the commonest alternative classifications were functional jerks and tremor), and 1 was uncertain. An additional 29 studies identified myoclonus without prior clinical suspicion. A total of 119 of 134 (89%) myoclonus patients had a specific neurophysiologic subtype identified, most commonly cortical (64, 54%). Diagnostic differential narrowed in 60% of patients, and a new diagnosis was made in 42 (14%) patients. Medication changes were made in 151 patients (52%), with improvement in 35 of 51 (67%) with follow‐up.ConclusionsMovement studies effectively determined movement classification and identified unsuspected myoclonus, leading to changes in diagnosis and management. © 2024 The Author(s). <jats:italic>Movement Disorders</jats:italic> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.","PeriodicalId":213,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.30022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMovement clinical neurophysiology studies can distinguish myoclonus, tremor, and other jerky movements; however, there has been limited demonstration of their real‐world clinical impact.ObjectiveThe aim was to investigate movement study utility in clarifying movement classification and guiding patient management.MethodA retrospective study of myoclonus‐related movement studies was performed.ResultsOf 262 patients referred for consideration of myoclonus, 105 (40%) had myoclonus, 156 (59%) had no myoclonus (the commonest alternative classifications were functional jerks and tremor), and 1 was uncertain. An additional 29 studies identified myoclonus without prior clinical suspicion. A total of 119 of 134 (89%) myoclonus patients had a specific neurophysiologic subtype identified, most commonly cortical (64, 54%). Diagnostic differential narrowed in 60% of patients, and a new diagnosis was made in 42 (14%) patients. Medication changes were made in 151 patients (52%), with improvement in 35 of 51 (67%) with follow‐up.ConclusionsMovement studies effectively determined movement classification and identified unsuspected myoclonus, leading to changes in diagnosis and management. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌阵挛神经电生理分类(和解密)的临床实用性
背景运动临床神经生理学研究可区分肌阵挛、震颤和其他抽搐运动;然而,其对实际临床影响的证明却很有限。目的研究运动研究在明确运动分类和指导患者管理方面的作用。结果 在转诊考虑肌阵挛的 262 名患者中,105 人(40%)有肌阵挛,156 人(59%)没有肌阵挛(最常见的替代分类是功能性抽搐和震颤),1 人不确定。另有 29 项研究在没有临床怀疑的情况下发现了肌阵挛。在 134 名肌阵挛患者中,共有 119 人(89%)确定了特定的神经生理学亚型,其中最常见的是皮质亚型(64 人,54%)。60%的患者的诊断鉴别范围缩小,42 名患者(14%)得到了新的诊断。结论运动研究有效地确定了运动分类,并发现了未被察觉的肌阵挛,从而改变了诊断和治疗方法。© 2024 作者姓名运动障碍》由 Wiley Periodicals LLC 代表国际帕金森和运动障碍协会出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Movement Disorders
Movement Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
371
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders publishes a variety of content types including Reviews, Viewpoints, Full Length Articles, Historical Reports, Brief Reports, and Letters. The journal considers original manuscripts on topics related to the diagnosis, therapeutics, pharmacology, biochemistry, physiology, etiology, genetics, and epidemiology of movement disorders. Appropriate topics include Parkinsonism, Chorea, Tremors, Dystonia, Myoclonus, Tics, Tardive Dyskinesia, Spasticity, and Ataxia.
期刊最新文献
Low-Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation in Non-Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Modifies Memory Retention in Parkinson's Disease. RAB32 Variants in a Chinese Parkinson's Disease Cohort. (TTTCA)exp Drives the Genotype-Phenotype Correlation and Genetic Anticipation in FCMTE1. Genome Aggregation Database Version 4-Allele Frequency Changes and Impact on Variant Interpretation in Dystonia. Interpersonal Psychotherapy for the Treatment of Depression in Parkinson's Disease: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1