Consultation Content and Techniques for measurement-Based Care Implementation in Youth Community Mental Health Settings.

Elizabeth Casline, Grace S Woodard, Elizabeth Lane, Scott Pollowitz, Susan Douglas, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Golda S Ginsburg, Amanda Jensen-Doss
{"title":"Consultation Content and Techniques for measurement-Based Care Implementation in Youth Community Mental Health Settings.","authors":"Elizabeth Casline, Grace S Woodard, Elizabeth Lane, Scott Pollowitz, Susan Douglas, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Golda S Ginsburg, Amanda Jensen-Doss","doi":"10.1007/s10488-024-01417-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement-based care (MBC) is an evidence-based practice (EBP) focused on regularly administering outcome measures to clients to inform clinical decision making. While MBC shows promise for improving youth treatment outcomes, therapist adoption remains low. Clinical consultation is one strategy that improves MBC implementation, but our limited understanding of consultation hinders the ability to optimize its impact. This research explored the content of, and techniques used during MBC consultation calls. Therapists (N = 55) in a randomized controlled trial treating adolescents with anxiety and/or depression were trained to utilize MBC with usual treatment using the Youth Outcome Questionnaire (YOQ) through an online measurement feedback system (MFS). Weekly ongoing consultation followed an initial workshop training in MBC. Case discussions (N = 294) during consultation calls were coded using a developed codebook, including 12 content and 10 consultant techniques. Results indicated that content focused predominantly on interpretation of client symptom and alliance report, planning for YOQ administration, and discussion of data with clients in session. Common consultant techniques included modeling and eliciting report viewing and interpretation, making clinical suggestions, and didactics about clinical and technical issues. Notably, role-play/behavioral rehearsal was not used. The prevalence of passive consultation techniques (suggestions, didactics) suggests a focus on teaching rather than active techniques (behavioral rehearsal, modeling), potentially influenced by the novelty of MBC and MFS. Technical aspects of MBC, such as measure administration and system usage, emerged as key consultation content, highlighting an unanticipated emphasis on logistics over clinical implementation. These findings underscore the evolving role of consultation in supporting MBC implementation and suggest that addressing technical challenges early in training might enhance adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-024-01417-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement-based care (MBC) is an evidence-based practice (EBP) focused on regularly administering outcome measures to clients to inform clinical decision making. While MBC shows promise for improving youth treatment outcomes, therapist adoption remains low. Clinical consultation is one strategy that improves MBC implementation, but our limited understanding of consultation hinders the ability to optimize its impact. This research explored the content of, and techniques used during MBC consultation calls. Therapists (N = 55) in a randomized controlled trial treating adolescents with anxiety and/or depression were trained to utilize MBC with usual treatment using the Youth Outcome Questionnaire (YOQ) through an online measurement feedback system (MFS). Weekly ongoing consultation followed an initial workshop training in MBC. Case discussions (N = 294) during consultation calls were coded using a developed codebook, including 12 content and 10 consultant techniques. Results indicated that content focused predominantly on interpretation of client symptom and alliance report, planning for YOQ administration, and discussion of data with clients in session. Common consultant techniques included modeling and eliciting report viewing and interpretation, making clinical suggestions, and didactics about clinical and technical issues. Notably, role-play/behavioral rehearsal was not used. The prevalence of passive consultation techniques (suggestions, didactics) suggests a focus on teaching rather than active techniques (behavioral rehearsal, modeling), potentially influenced by the novelty of MBC and MFS. Technical aspects of MBC, such as measure administration and system usage, emerged as key consultation content, highlighting an unanticipated emphasis on logistics over clinical implementation. These findings underscore the evolving role of consultation in supporting MBC implementation and suggest that addressing technical challenges early in training might enhance adoption.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在青少年社区心理健康机构实施基于测量的护理的咨询内容和技术。
基于测量的护理(MBC)是一种循证实践(EBP),其重点是定期对客户进行结果测量,为临床决策提供依据。虽然 MBC 有望改善青少年的治疗效果,但治疗师的采用率仍然很低。临床咨询是改善 MBC 实施的一种策略,但我们对咨询的了解有限,这阻碍了我们优化其影响的能力。本研究探讨了 MBC 咨询电话的内容和使用技巧。在一项随机对照试验中,治疗焦虑和/或抑郁青少年的治疗师(N = 55)通过在线测量反馈系统(MFS)接受了培训,以便在使用青少年结果问卷(YOQ)进行常规治疗的同时使用 MBC。在最初的 MBC 工作坊培训之后,每周都会进行持续咨询。咨询电话中的病例讨论(N = 294)使用开发的编码手册进行编码,其中包括 12 项内容和 10 项咨询技术。结果表明,内容主要集中在对客户症状和联盟报告的解释、YOQ 管理计划以及在会话中与客户讨论数据。常见的咨询技巧包括示范和诱导客户查看和解释报告、提出临床建议以及就临床和技术问题进行说教。值得注意的是,没有使用角色扮演/行为演练。被动咨询技术(建议、说教)的盛行表明,可能是受到 MBC 和 MFS 的新颖性的影响,人们将重点放在了教学而非主动技术(行为演练、建模)上。MBC 的技术方面,如测量管理和系统使用,成为主要的咨询内容,突出了对后勤而非临床实施的重视,这是意料之外的。这些发现强调了咨询在支持 MBC 实施中不断发展的作用,并表明在培训早期解决技术难题可能会提高采用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
期刊最新文献
Strategic Treatment and Assessment for Youth (STAY): A Theoretically-Driven, Culturally-Tailored MBC Approach. A Model for Understanding Lived Expertise to Support Effective Recruitment of Peer Roles. Life After EBPs: Characterizing Subsequent Engagement in Evidence-Based Psychotherapy After Completion of an Initial Trauma-Focused EBP in a National Sample of VA Patients. Should We Use Clinician Self-Report to Tailor Implementation Strategies? Predicting Use of Youth CBT with Clinician Self-Report Versus Direct Observation. Factors Influencing the Engagement with Electronic Mental Health Technologies: A Systematic Review of Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1