Age differences in emotional reactivity to facets of sadness and anger.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI:10.1080/13825585.2024.2414473
Ryan M Muskin, Eric S Allard
{"title":"Age differences in emotional reactivity to facets of sadness and anger.","authors":"Ryan M Muskin, Eric S Allard","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2024.2414473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotional reactivity, based on the discrete emotions approach (DEA), is related to opportunities or constraints across development. While prior research suggests sadness to be more adaptive in old age and anger to be more adaptive in young adulthood, there may be facets within these discrete emotion categories that further expand the DEA framework: loss-based vs. failure-based sadness and frustration-based vs. moral violation-based anger. A sample of 49 younger adults (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 20.00, <i>SD</i> = 2.26) and 51 older adults (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 66.00, <i>SD</i> = 4.94) were asked to relive and describe an emotional memory associated with facets of sadness and anger. Emotional reactivity was operationalized through self-report ratings on distinct facet categories. Results revealed a significant age difference in emotional reactivity to moral violation-based anger, with older adults being more reactive than younger adults. No other significant age differences were observed. These findings are discussed in terms of how further distinctions across emotional facets can inform a better understanding of affective experience across adulthood and old age.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2024.2414473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotional reactivity, based on the discrete emotions approach (DEA), is related to opportunities or constraints across development. While prior research suggests sadness to be more adaptive in old age and anger to be more adaptive in young adulthood, there may be facets within these discrete emotion categories that further expand the DEA framework: loss-based vs. failure-based sadness and frustration-based vs. moral violation-based anger. A sample of 49 younger adults (Mage = 20.00, SD = 2.26) and 51 older adults (Mage = 66.00, SD = 4.94) were asked to relive and describe an emotional memory associated with facets of sadness and anger. Emotional reactivity was operationalized through self-report ratings on distinct facet categories. Results revealed a significant age difference in emotional reactivity to moral violation-based anger, with older adults being more reactive than younger adults. No other significant age differences were observed. These findings are discussed in terms of how further distinctions across emotional facets can inform a better understanding of affective experience across adulthood and old age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对悲伤和愤怒的情绪反应的年龄差异。
基于离散情绪法(DEA)的情绪反应性与整个发展过程中的机遇或限制有关。先前的研究表明,悲伤情绪在老年期更具有适应性,而愤怒情绪在青年期更具有适应性,但这些离散情绪类别中可能存在进一步扩展 DEA 框架的层面:基于损失的悲伤情绪与基于失败的悲伤情绪,以及基于挫折的愤怒情绪与基于道德侵犯的愤怒情绪。研究人员要求 49 名年轻成年人(平均年龄为 20.00 岁,平均年龄为 2.26 岁)和 51 名老年人(平均年龄为 66.00 岁,平均年龄为 4.94 岁)重温并描述与悲伤和愤怒相关的情绪记忆。情绪反应性是通过对不同面相类别的自我报告评分来实现的。结果显示,在对基于道德侵犯的愤怒的情绪反应性方面存在明显的年龄差异,老年人比年轻人反应更强烈。没有观察到其他明显的年龄差异。本研究从进一步区分不同的情绪面来更好地理解成年和老年期情绪体验的角度对这些发现进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive components of aging-related increase in word-finding difficulty. Accelerated long-term forgetting: from subjective memory decline to a defined clinical entity. Naturalistic assessments in virtual reality and in real life help resolve the age-prospective memory paradox. Effects of extended practice and unitization on relational memory in older adults and neuropsychological lesion cases. Age differences in spatial memory are mitigated during naturalistic navigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1