Efficiency of clear aligners with nickel titanium wires for treating mandibular incisor crowding.

IF 1.9 Bioinformation Pub Date : 2024-08-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.6026/973206300200917
Yohan Verghese, Khumanthem Savana, Bhumika Khattar, Omar Basheer Altaher Mohammed, Prerna Raje Batham, Ulrika Diana Pereira Kalia, Noura Alessa
{"title":"Efficiency of clear aligners with nickel titanium wires for treating mandibular incisor crowding.","authors":"Yohan Verghese, Khumanthem Savana, Bhumika Khattar, Omar Basheer Altaher Mohammed, Prerna Raje Batham, Ulrika Diana Pereira Kalia, Noura Alessa","doi":"10.6026/973206300200917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients who are allergic to nickel, which is present in stainless steel brackets and wires, commonly utilise clear aligners. The objective of this research was to compare the management of mandibular incisor crowding with nickel titanium (NiTi) wires and clear aligners. A random division of forty participants into two groups of twenty samples each was made. Participants in group B received transparent aligners, whereas those in group A received NiTi arch wires. We assessed malocclusion using Little's irregularity index. A survey instrument was utilised to document the degree of discomfort. Patients were routinely recalled every one, two, and three months. The mean score for groups A and B was 2.86 mm and 2.88 mm at baseline, 1.71 mm and 1.52 mm at one month, 1.02 mm and 1.23 mm at two months, and 0.72 mm and 0.48 mm at three months, respectively. The difference wasn't that big (p > 0.05). In groups A and B, the mean change in Little's irregularity index score was 1.19 mm and 1.21 mm at one month, 0.55 mm and 0.51 mm at two months, and 0.26 mm and 0.45 mm at three months, respectively. The difference wasn't that big (p > 0.05). For groups A and B, the corresponding mean discomfort scores were 2.6 and 2.3 at baseline, 2.2 and 1.8 after one month, 1.6 and 1.5 at two months, and 1.1 and 0.9 at three months. Since p > 0.05, the difference was not significant. The results of this study showed that NiTi wires and clear aligners worked just as well to treat cases of mandibular anterior crowding.</p>","PeriodicalId":8962,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformation","volume":"20 8","pages":"917-920"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300200917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients who are allergic to nickel, which is present in stainless steel brackets and wires, commonly utilise clear aligners. The objective of this research was to compare the management of mandibular incisor crowding with nickel titanium (NiTi) wires and clear aligners. A random division of forty participants into two groups of twenty samples each was made. Participants in group B received transparent aligners, whereas those in group A received NiTi arch wires. We assessed malocclusion using Little's irregularity index. A survey instrument was utilised to document the degree of discomfort. Patients were routinely recalled every one, two, and three months. The mean score for groups A and B was 2.86 mm and 2.88 mm at baseline, 1.71 mm and 1.52 mm at one month, 1.02 mm and 1.23 mm at two months, and 0.72 mm and 0.48 mm at three months, respectively. The difference wasn't that big (p > 0.05). In groups A and B, the mean change in Little's irregularity index score was 1.19 mm and 1.21 mm at one month, 0.55 mm and 0.51 mm at two months, and 0.26 mm and 0.45 mm at three months, respectively. The difference wasn't that big (p > 0.05). For groups A and B, the corresponding mean discomfort scores were 2.6 and 2.3 at baseline, 2.2 and 1.8 after one month, 1.6 and 1.5 at two months, and 1.1 and 0.9 at three months. Since p > 0.05, the difference was not significant. The results of this study showed that NiTi wires and clear aligners worked just as well to treat cases of mandibular anterior crowding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用镍钛金属丝的透明矫治器治疗下颌门牙拥挤的效率。
对不锈钢托槽和钢丝中的镍过敏的患者通常使用透明矫正器。这项研究的目的是比较镍钛(NiTi)钢丝和透明矫治器对下颌切牙拥挤的治疗效果。研究人员将 40 名参与者随机分为两组,每组 20 个样本。B组参与者使用透明矫正器,而A组参与者使用镍钛弓丝。我们使用利特尔不整齐指数对错合畸形进行评估。我们还使用调查工具来记录患者的不适程度。每隔一、二、三个月对患者进行一次例行回访。A 组和 B 组的基线平均得分分别为 2.86 毫米和 2.88 毫米,一个月时分别为 1.71 毫米和 1.52 毫米,两个月时分别为 1.02 毫米和 1.23 毫米,三个月时分别为 0.72 毫米和 0.48 毫米。差异不大(P > 0.05)。在 A 组和 B 组中,一个月时利特尔不规则指数评分的平均变化分别为 1.19 毫米和 1.21 毫米,两个月时分别为 0.55 毫米和 0.51 毫米,三个月时分别为 0.26 毫米和 0.45 毫米。差异不大(P>0.05)。对于 A 组和 B 组,基线时相应的平均不适感评分分别为 2.6 分和 2.3 分,一个月后分别为 2.2 分和 1.8 分,两个月后分别为 1.6 分和 1.5 分,三个月后分别为 1.1 分和 0.9 分。由于 p > 0.05,因此差异不显著。这项研究的结果表明,镍钛矫治线和透明矫治器在治疗下颌前牙拥挤方面同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bioinformation
Bioinformation MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practices among dental technicians toward digital laboratory procedures in India: A cross-sectional study. Cardiovascular risk factors and life expectancy in India: A retrospective study. CBCT for accurate diagnosis of oral lesions: Comparison with biopsy and imaging. Assessment of nerve regeneration using nerve guidance conduits in inferior alveolar nerve injuries. Barriers to mental health care among severe mental illness in rural India: A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1