Measuring clinical outcomes in adult ADHD clinics: psychometrics of a new scale, the adult ADHD Clinical Outcome Scale.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.739
Dimitrios Adamis, Jasmin Singh, Iulian Coada, Margo Wrigley, Blánaid Gavin, Fiona McNicholas
{"title":"Measuring clinical outcomes in adult ADHD clinics: psychometrics of a new scale, the adult ADHD Clinical Outcome Scale.","authors":"Dimitrios Adamis, Jasmin Singh, Iulian Coada, Margo Wrigley, Blánaid Gavin, Fiona McNicholas","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) clinics are in their infancy in Ireland and internationally. There is an urgent need for clinical evaluation of these services. Until now, clinical outcomes have relied mainly on functional scales and/or quality of life. However, adult ADHD is a longstanding disorder with many comorbidities. Although medication for ADHD symptoms can have immediate effects, co-occurring problems may take considerably longer to remediate.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To present the psychometrics of a short outcome measure of key clinical areas including symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The ADHD Clinical Outcome Scale (ACOS), developed by the authors, is a clinician-rated scale and was administered in consecutive adults attending an ADHD clinic. A modified version was completed by the participant. A second clinician independently administered the scale in a subsample. ACOS consists of 15 items rated on a Likert scale. Two self-report scales, the Adult ADHD Quality of Life Questionnaire (AAQoL) and Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS), were also administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of 148 participants was 30.1 years (s.d. = 9.71), and 81 were female (54.7%). The correlation for interrater reliability was <i>r</i> = 0.868, and that between the participant and clinician versions was <i>r</i> = 0.663. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the internal consistency was 0.829, and the correlations for concurrent validity with total AAQoL and WFIRS scores were <i>r</i> = -0.573 and <i>r</i> = 0.477, respectively. Factor analysis revealed four factors: (a) attentional/organisational problems; (b) hyperactivity/impulsivity; (c) comorbidities; and (d) alcohol/drug use, self-harm and tension in relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The psychometrics of the ACOS are promising, and the inclusion of typically co-occurring clinical domains makes it suitable for use as a clinician-rated outcome measure in every contact with patients attending adult ADHD clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 6","pages":"e180"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.739","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) clinics are in their infancy in Ireland and internationally. There is an urgent need for clinical evaluation of these services. Until now, clinical outcomes have relied mainly on functional scales and/or quality of life. However, adult ADHD is a longstanding disorder with many comorbidities. Although medication for ADHD symptoms can have immediate effects, co-occurring problems may take considerably longer to remediate.

Aims: To present the psychometrics of a short outcome measure of key clinical areas including symptoms.

Method: The ADHD Clinical Outcome Scale (ACOS), developed by the authors, is a clinician-rated scale and was administered in consecutive adults attending an ADHD clinic. A modified version was completed by the participant. A second clinician independently administered the scale in a subsample. ACOS consists of 15 items rated on a Likert scale. Two self-report scales, the Adult ADHD Quality of Life Questionnaire (AAQoL) and Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS), were also administered.

Results: The mean age of 148 participants was 30.1 years (s.d. = 9.71), and 81 were female (54.7%). The correlation for interrater reliability was r = 0.868, and that between the participant and clinician versions was r = 0.663. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the internal consistency was 0.829, and the correlations for concurrent validity with total AAQoL and WFIRS scores were r = -0.573 and r = 0.477, respectively. Factor analysis revealed four factors: (a) attentional/organisational problems; (b) hyperactivity/impulsivity; (c) comorbidities; and (d) alcohol/drug use, self-harm and tension in relationships.

Conclusions: The psychometrics of the ACOS are promising, and the inclusion of typically co-occurring clinical domains makes it suitable for use as a clinician-rated outcome measure in every contact with patients attending adult ADHD clinics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量成人多动症诊所的临床成果:新量表(成人多动症临床成果量表)的心理测量学。
背景:成人注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)诊所在爱尔兰和国际上都处于起步阶段。目前迫切需要对这些服务进行临床评估。迄今为止,临床结果主要依赖于功能量表和/或生活质量。然而,成人多动症是一种长期存在的疾病,有许多并发症。尽管针对多动症症状的药物治疗可以产生立竿见影的效果,但同时存在的问题可能需要更长的时间才能得到缓解。目的:介绍一种针对包括症状在内的关键临床领域的简短结果测量方法的心理测量学:ADHD临床结果量表(ACOS)由作者开发,是一种由临床医生评分的量表,对连续到ADHD诊所就诊的成年人进行测量。参与者填写修改版。第二名临床医生对一个子样本进行独立施测。ACOS 由 15 个项目组成,采用李克特量表评分。此外,还采用了两个自我报告量表,即成人多动症生活质量问卷(AAQoL)和韦氏功能损伤评定量表(WFIRS):148 名参与者的平均年龄为 30.1 岁(s.d. = 9.71),其中 81 人为女性(54.7%)。研究者之间的相关性为 r = 0.868,研究者版本和临床医生版本之间的相关性为 r = 0.663。内部一致性的类内相关系数为 0.829,与 AAQoL 和 WFIRS 总分的并发效度相关系数分别为 r = -0.573 和 r = 0.477。因子分析显示了四个因子:(a) 注意力/组织问题;(b) 多动/冲动;(c) 合并症;(d) 酗酒/吸毒、自残和人际关系紧张:结论:ACOS 的心理测量结果很有希望,它包含了典型的并发临床领域,因此适合在成人多动症诊所与患者的每次接触中用作临床医生评定的结果测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
期刊最新文献
Comparing measurements of lithium treatment efficacy in people with bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis - CORRIGENDUM. Factors associated with mental health outcomes in a Muslim community following the Christchurch terrorist attack. Breaking barriers in the career development of women in academic psychiatry. Cognitive, adaptive and daily life functioning in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Depression in childhood to early adulthood and respiratory health in early adulthood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1