For which entrustable professional activities must medical students be prepared if unsupervised patient care without further training is an expectation? An international Global South study.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016090
Olle Ten Cate, Daniel Nel, Marije P Hennus, Susanne Peters, Gustavo Salata Romao
{"title":"For which entrustable professional activities must medical students be prepared if unsupervised patient care without further training is an expectation? An international Global South study.","authors":"Olle Ten Cate, Daniel Nel, Marije P Hennus, Susanne Peters, Gustavo Salata Romao","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Training medical students requires objectives that are often translated into frameworks of competencies. Since the introduction of entrustable professional activities (EPAs), these tasks or 'units of professional practice', originally conceived for postgraduate training, define what residents must be prepared to do unsupervised. Nowadays, EPAs are also applied to undergraduate training, with the prospect of entering residency. However, in many countries, especially in the Global South, a substantial number of medical graduates will be working in healthcare with little or no supervision and no further training soon or ever. EPAs for these conditions cannot be copied from undergraduate medical education EPA frameworks in Global North countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a generative investigation to identify and elaborate EPAs for Global South countries who must train students for unsupervised general practice. We included 39 medical educators from 13 Global South countries and 17 specialties in either one of two online focus group sessions using a nominal group technique (NGT) or as Delphi panel member. Results from the two NGT sessions were merged and fed into the two-round Delphi investigation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A framework of 11 EPAs resulted, each with an elaborate description (specification, setting and limitations).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This framework of undergraduate medical education Global South EPAs differs in its nature and specifications from existing Global North EPAs. The authors do not pretend universality for all Global South countries with graduates who face expectations of unsupervised practice but present it to support countries that consider introducing the model of entrustable professional activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Training medical students requires objectives that are often translated into frameworks of competencies. Since the introduction of entrustable professional activities (EPAs), these tasks or 'units of professional practice', originally conceived for postgraduate training, define what residents must be prepared to do unsupervised. Nowadays, EPAs are also applied to undergraduate training, with the prospect of entering residency. However, in many countries, especially in the Global South, a substantial number of medical graduates will be working in healthcare with little or no supervision and no further training soon or ever. EPAs for these conditions cannot be copied from undergraduate medical education EPA frameworks in Global North countries.

Methods: We conducted a generative investigation to identify and elaborate EPAs for Global South countries who must train students for unsupervised general practice. We included 39 medical educators from 13 Global South countries and 17 specialties in either one of two online focus group sessions using a nominal group technique (NGT) or as Delphi panel member. Results from the two NGT sessions were merged and fed into the two-round Delphi investigation.

Results: A framework of 11 EPAs resulted, each with an elaborate description (specification, setting and limitations).

Conclusion: This framework of undergraduate medical education Global South EPAs differs in its nature and specifications from existing Global North EPAs. The authors do not pretend universality for all Global South countries with graduates who face expectations of unsupervised practice but present it to support countries that consider introducing the model of entrustable professional activities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如果期望医科学生在没有进一步培训的情况下从事不受监督的病人护理工作,那么他们必须为哪些可委托的专业活动做好准备?一项全球南部国际研究。
介绍:医科学生的培训目标通常转化为能力框架。自引入 "可委托专业活动"(EPAs)以来,这些任务或 "专业实践单元 "最初是为研究生培训而设计的,规定了住院医师必须准备在无人监督的情况下完成的任务。如今,EPAs 也适用于本科生培训,并有望进入住院医师培训。然而,在许多国家,尤其是全球南部国家,大量医学毕业生将在很少或没有监督的情况下从事医疗保健工作,并且很快或永远不会有进一步的培训。针对这些情况的 EPA 不能照搬全球北方国家的本科医学教育 EPA 框架:我们开展了一项生成性调查,以确定和制定必须为无监督全科实践培训学生的全球南方国家的 EPA。我们让来自 13 个全球南方国家和 17 个专业的 39 名医学教育工作者参加了采用名义小组技术(NGT)的两个在线焦点小组会议之一,或作为德尔菲小组成员参加了这两个会议。两个 NGT 会议的结果被合并并纳入两轮德尔菲调查:结果:形成了一个由 11 个 EPA 组成的框架,每个 EPA 都有详细说明(说明、设置和限制):结论:这一本科医学教育全球南方 EPA 框架在性质和规格上有别于现有的全球北方 EPA。作者并不自诩该框架适用于所有南半球国家,因为这些国家的毕业生面临着无监督实践的期望,但作者提出该框架是为了支持那些考虑引入可委托专业活动模式的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Caught between violence: Mpox virus and the perils of neglect in Africa. Health impact and cost-effectiveness of vaccination using potential next-generation influenza vaccines in Thailand: a modelling study. Probing the past: historical case study analysis to inform more just and sustainable global health partnerships in education. Seven core competencies and conditions for equitable partnerships and power sharing in community-based participatory research. Private sector tuberculosis care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional standardised patients study of adherence to national TB guidelines in urban Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1