Temporal Shifts in Etiological Agents and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Biliary Tract Infections in Sichuan Province, China (2017-2023).

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection and Drug Resistance Pub Date : 2024-10-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IDR.S474191
Yi Li, Dan Li, Xiangning Huang, Shanshan Long, Hua Yu, Jie Zhang
{"title":"Temporal Shifts in Etiological Agents and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Biliary Tract Infections in Sichuan Province, China (2017-2023).","authors":"Yi Li, Dan Li, Xiangning Huang, Shanshan Long, Hua Yu, Jie Zhang","doi":"10.2147/IDR.S474191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We analyzed the pathogenic bacteria and antibiotic resistance distributions in patients with biliary tract infections (BTI) using samples from the Antimicrobial Resistant Investigation Network of Sichuan Province (ARINSP) to promote the rational use of antibiotics to reduce multidrug resistance.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Participating hospitals identified isolates between 2017 and 2023 and conducted antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Isolated bacteria were identified and tested for drug sensitivity using MOLDI-TOF mass spectrometry system, VITEK automated drug sensitivity system and paper diffusion method, and the results were interpreted with reference to CLSI M100 30th edition standards. WHONET 5.6 was used to analyze the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 25,573 bacterial isolates were collected; 18,134 were Gram-negative (70.9%). The top five most frequently isolated bacteria were <i>Escherichia coli</i> (8,181/25,573; 32.0%), <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (3,247/25,573; 12.7%), <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> (2,331/25,573; 9.1%), <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (1,714/25,573; 6.7%), and <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i> (1,429/25,573; 5.6%). <i>E. coli</i> and <i>E. faecalis</i> slowly declined over time, while <i>K. pneumoniae</i> slowly increased; <i>E. faecium</i> frequency was stable; <i>E. coli</i> resistance to ampicillin was the highest among all antibiotics tested; resistance rates decreased with the addition of sulbactam. <i>K. pneumoniae</i> resistance to aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, and chloramphenicol remained low. <i>E. cloacae</i> was highly resistant to cephalosporins, especially cefoxitin and cefazolin. <i>E. faecalis'</i> resistance to teicoplanin remained low, decreasing from 6.9% in 2017 to 0.0% in 2019 before stabilizing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most frequently isolated bacteria from patients with BTIs were Enterobacteriaceae, including <i>E. coli</i> and <i>K. pneumoniae</i>, followed by <i>E. faecium</i> and <i>E. faecalis</i>. Isolates exhibited high resistance to routinely used antibiotics (cephalosporins) and were highly sensitive to tigecycline, carbapenem, amikacin, and vancomycin. The results guide the rational use and continual revision of antibiotic regimens for BTIs to reduce antibiotic resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13577,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Drug Resistance","volume":"17 ","pages":"4377-4389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S474191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We analyzed the pathogenic bacteria and antibiotic resistance distributions in patients with biliary tract infections (BTI) using samples from the Antimicrobial Resistant Investigation Network of Sichuan Province (ARINSP) to promote the rational use of antibiotics to reduce multidrug resistance.

Patients and methods: Participating hospitals identified isolates between 2017 and 2023 and conducted antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Isolated bacteria were identified and tested for drug sensitivity using MOLDI-TOF mass spectrometry system, VITEK automated drug sensitivity system and paper diffusion method, and the results were interpreted with reference to CLSI M100 30th edition standards. WHONET 5.6 was used to analyze the results.

Results: In total, 25,573 bacterial isolates were collected; 18,134 were Gram-negative (70.9%). The top five most frequently isolated bacteria were Escherichia coli (8,181/25,573; 32.0%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (3,247/25,573; 12.7%), Enterococcus faecium (2,331/25,573; 9.1%), Enterococcus faecalis (1,714/25,573; 6.7%), and Enterobacter cloacae (1,429/25,573; 5.6%). E. coli and E. faecalis slowly declined over time, while K. pneumoniae slowly increased; E. faecium frequency was stable; E. coli resistance to ampicillin was the highest among all antibiotics tested; resistance rates decreased with the addition of sulbactam. K. pneumoniae resistance to aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, and chloramphenicol remained low. E. cloacae was highly resistant to cephalosporins, especially cefoxitin and cefazolin. E. faecalis' resistance to teicoplanin remained low, decreasing from 6.9% in 2017 to 0.0% in 2019 before stabilizing.

Conclusion: The most frequently isolated bacteria from patients with BTIs were Enterobacteriaceae, including E. coli and K. pneumoniae, followed by E. faecium and E. faecalis. Isolates exhibited high resistance to routinely used antibiotics (cephalosporins) and were highly sensitive to tigecycline, carbapenem, amikacin, and vancomycin. The results guide the rational use and continual revision of antibiotic regimens for BTIs to reduce antibiotic resistance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国四川省胆道感染病原菌和抗生素耐药模式的时间变化(2017-2023 年)》。
目的:我们利用四川省抗菌药物耐药性调查网络(ARINSP)的样本分析了胆道感染(BTI)患者的病原菌和抗生素耐药性分布,以促进抗生素的合理使用,减少多重耐药性:参与研究的医院在2017年至2023年期间鉴定了分离菌,并进行了抗菌药物敏感性试验。采用MOLDI-TOF质谱系统、VITEK自动药敏系统和纸片扩散法对分离细菌进行鉴定和药敏试验,并参照CLSI M100第30版标准对结果进行解释。使用 WHONET 5.6 对结果进行分析:共收集到 25,573 株细菌分离物,其中 18,134 株为革兰氏阴性菌(70.9%)。最常分离的前五种细菌是大肠埃希菌(8,181/25,573;32.0%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(3,247/25,573;12.7%)、粪肠球菌(2,331/25,573;9.1%)、粪肠球菌(1,714/25,573;6.7%)和泄殖腔肠杆菌(1,429/25,573;5.6%)。随着时间的推移,大肠杆菌和粪肠球菌的耐药性慢慢下降,而肺炎双球菌的耐药性则慢慢上升;粪肠球菌的耐药性比较稳定;在所有测试的抗生素中,大肠杆菌对氨苄西林的耐药性最高;加入舒巴坦后,耐药率有所下降。肺炎双球菌对阿司匹林、亚胺培南、美罗培南、厄他培南和氯霉素的耐药性仍然很低。泄殖腔杆菌对头孢菌素类药物,尤其是头孢西丁和头孢唑啉的耐药性很强。粪肠球菌对替考拉宁的耐药性仍然很低,从2017年的6.9%降至2019年的0.0%,然后趋于稳定:从 BTIs 患者中分离出的最常见细菌是肠杆菌科细菌,包括大肠杆菌和肺炎双球菌,其次是粪杆菌和粪肠球菌。分离出的细菌对常规抗生素(头孢菌素类)具有高度耐药性,对替加环素、碳青霉烯类、阿米卡星和万古霉素高度敏感。这些结果为合理使用和不断修订 BTI 的抗生素治疗方案以减少抗生素耐药性提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection and Drug Resistance
Infection and Drug Resistance Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: About Journal Editors Peer Reviewers Articles Article Publishing Charges Aims and Scope Call For Papers ISSN: 1178-6973 Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suresh Antony An international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the optimal treatment of infection (bacterial, fungal and viral) and the development and institution of preventative strategies to minimize the development and spread of resistance.
期刊最新文献
Cefiderocol in the Successful Treatment of Complicated Hospital-Acquired K. pneumoniae NDM, OXA48 Intraabdominal Infection. Five Years' Experience with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Among Hospitalized Patients: A Retrospective Study from Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Tuberculous Spondylitis and Paravertebral Abscess Formation Following Vertebroplasty: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. A Novel Variant of KPC-179 Conferring Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance in a Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolate. Prevalence and Molecular Characteristics of 16S rRNA Methylase Genes in Clinical Isolates of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1