Evaluation of Visual Outcomes in Patients With Aberrated Corneas Implanted With the IC-8 Small-Aperture IOL.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of refractive surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20240826-02
Zhen Ling Teo, Nicole Ming Sie, Jodhbir S Mehta
{"title":"Evaluation of Visual Outcomes in Patients With Aberrated Corneas Implanted With the IC-8 Small-Aperture IOL.","authors":"Zhen Ling Teo, Nicole Ming Sie, Jodhbir S Mehta","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20240826-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the visual outcomes in patients with cataract implanted with a small-aperture intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with aberrated corneas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, non-interventional, single-center clinical study was conducted at Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore. Twenty-one patients with aberrated corneas had IC-8 IOL (Bausch & Lomb, Inc) implantation. An aberrated cornea was defined as from natural causes: keratoconus (n = 1, 4.8%), high coma (n = 2, 9.5%), corneal scar (n = 1, 4.8%), or iatrogenic causes: keratorefractive procedure (n = 17, 86%). Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities were measured at distance (600 cm) (UDVA and CDVA), intermediate (66.7 cm) (UIVA and CIVA), and near (40 cm) (UNVA and CIVA). Defocus curve was tested monocularly and binocularly. Contrast sensitivity (CS) was measured under photopic and mesopic conditions with and without glare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In IC-8 eyes, the mean ± standard deviation UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA was 0.24 ± 0.18, 0.19 ± 0.18, and 0.14 ± 0.14 logMAR, respectively. Mean CDVA, CIVA, and CNVA in IC-8 eyes was 0.12 ± 0.17, 0.16 ± 0.15, and 0.19 ± 0.13 logMAR, respectively. Binocular mean UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA was 0.07 ± 0.10, 0.07 ± 0.10, and 0.13 ± 0.12 logMAR, respectively. Defocus curve testing yielded a depth of focus of 1.50 D monocularly and 2.00 D binocularly at a 0.2 logMAR threshold. Photopic binocular CS with and without glare improved over monocular CS of IC-8 and fellow eyes under all spatial frequencies. Mesopic binocular CS with and without glare were similar among monocular IC-8 and fellow eyes across spatial frequencies. Most patients reported low levels of visual symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IC-8 IOL provides good monocular and binocular visual outcomes for patients with cataract who had aberrated corneas. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(10):e716-e723.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"40 10","pages":"e716-e723"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20240826-02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the visual outcomes in patients with cataract implanted with a small-aperture intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with aberrated corneas.

Methods: This prospective, non-interventional, single-center clinical study was conducted at Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore. Twenty-one patients with aberrated corneas had IC-8 IOL (Bausch & Lomb, Inc) implantation. An aberrated cornea was defined as from natural causes: keratoconus (n = 1, 4.8%), high coma (n = 2, 9.5%), corneal scar (n = 1, 4.8%), or iatrogenic causes: keratorefractive procedure (n = 17, 86%). Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities were measured at distance (600 cm) (UDVA and CDVA), intermediate (66.7 cm) (UIVA and CIVA), and near (40 cm) (UNVA and CIVA). Defocus curve was tested monocularly and binocularly. Contrast sensitivity (CS) was measured under photopic and mesopic conditions with and without glare.

Results: In IC-8 eyes, the mean ± standard deviation UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA was 0.24 ± 0.18, 0.19 ± 0.18, and 0.14 ± 0.14 logMAR, respectively. Mean CDVA, CIVA, and CNVA in IC-8 eyes was 0.12 ± 0.17, 0.16 ± 0.15, and 0.19 ± 0.13 logMAR, respectively. Binocular mean UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA was 0.07 ± 0.10, 0.07 ± 0.10, and 0.13 ± 0.12 logMAR, respectively. Defocus curve testing yielded a depth of focus of 1.50 D monocularly and 2.00 D binocularly at a 0.2 logMAR threshold. Photopic binocular CS with and without glare improved over monocular CS of IC-8 and fellow eyes under all spatial frequencies. Mesopic binocular CS with and without glare were similar among monocular IC-8 and fellow eyes across spatial frequencies. Most patients reported low levels of visual symptoms.

Conclusions: The IC-8 IOL provides good monocular and binocular visual outcomes for patients with cataract who had aberrated corneas. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(10):e716-e723.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对植入 IC-8 小孔径人工晶体的角膜畸变患者的视觉效果进行评估。
目的:评估白内障患者在角膜畸变眼内植入小孔径人工晶体(IOL)后的视觉效果:这项前瞻性、非干预性、单中心临床研究在新加坡国立眼科中心进行。21 名角膜像差患者接受了 IC-8 人工晶体(博士伦公司)植入手术。角膜畸变被定义为自然原因:角膜炎(1 例,4.8%)、高昏迷(2 例,9.5%)、角膜瘢痕(1 例,4.8%)或人为原因:角膜屈光手术(17 例,86%)。在远距离(600 厘米)(UDVA 和 CDVA)、中距离(66.7 厘米)(UIVA 和 CIVA)和近距离(40 厘米)(UNVA 和 CIVA)测量未矫正视力和矫正视力。单眼和双眼离焦曲线测试。在有眩光和无眩光的光视和中视条件下测量对比敏感度(CS):在 IC-8 眼睛中,UDVA、UIVA 和 UNVA 的平均值(± 标准偏差)分别为 0.24 ± 0.18、0.19 ± 0.18 和 0.14 ± 0.14 logMAR。IC-8 眼睛的平均 CDVA、CIVA 和 CNVA 分别为 0.12 ± 0.17、0.16 ± 0.15 和 0.19 ± 0.13 logMAR。双眼平均 UDVA、UIVA 和 UNVA 分别为 0.07 ± 0.10、0.07 ± 0.10 和 0.13 ± 0.12 logMAR。离焦曲线测试显示,在 0.2 logMAR 临界值下,单眼焦深为 1.50 D,双眼焦深为 2.00 D。在所有空间频率下,有眩光和无眩光的光视双眼CS均比IC-8和同侧眼睛的单眼CS有所改善。在所有空间频率下,有眩光和无眩光的中焦双眼CS与单眼IC-8和双眼CS相似。大多数患者的视觉症状较轻:IC-8人工晶体为角膜像差的白内障患者提供了良好的单眼和双眼视觉效果。[J Refract Surg. 2024;40(10):e716-e723]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Visual and Safety Outcomes of Refractive Correction Procedures Following Lens Removal for Residual Refractive Error: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 2024 Reviewers. A Nomogram to Improve the Predictability of High Myopic Astigmatism in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery. Application of the Taylor Diagram in Evaluating the Performance of IOL Formulas. Clarification of Femtosecond Laser Terminology: Energy, Fluence, Dose.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1