Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the kinesiophobia causes scale: A descriptive survey have undergone total knee arthroplasty in China.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Science Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2024.09.006
Yuru Guo, Yanjin Liu, Yuan Zheng, Libai Cai, Min Ren, Yaya Zhai
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the kinesiophobia causes scale: A descriptive survey have undergone total knee arthroplasty in China.","authors":"Yuru Guo, Yanjin Liu, Yuan Zheng, Libai Cai, Min Ren, Yaya Zhai","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this study were to revise the Kinesiophobia Causes Scale (KCS) to make it suitable for Chinese cultural context and to verify its applicability in Chinese Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TKA patients in Henan Province, China (N = 418, average age ≥64 years). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was performed on two samples randomly selected from the population (each N = 208). Psychometric properties, including the content, construct, predictive and concurrent validity was evaluated for KCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The KCS scale showed desirable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.927), test-retest reliability (0.936), and content validity (0.958). A seven-factor structure was revealed and confirmed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The area under the curve was 0.852. The optimal cut-off score for KCS was 3.68.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed Chinese version of KCS is both reliable and valid when applied in Chinese setting of TKA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.09.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of this study were to revise the Kinesiophobia Causes Scale (KCS) to make it suitable for Chinese cultural context and to verify its applicability in Chinese Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients.

Methods: TKA patients in Henan Province, China (N = 418, average age ≥64 years). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was performed on two samples randomly selected from the population (each N = 208). Psychometric properties, including the content, construct, predictive and concurrent validity was evaluated for KCS.

Results: The KCS scale showed desirable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.927), test-retest reliability (0.936), and content validity (0.958). A seven-factor structure was revealed and confirmed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The area under the curve was 0.852. The optimal cut-off score for KCS was 3.68.

Conclusions: The developed Chinese version of KCS is both reliable and valid when applied in Chinese setting of TKA patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动恐惧原因量表的跨文化适应与验证:对在中国接受全膝关节置换术的患者进行描述性调查。
研究目的本研究旨在修订运动恐惧原因量表(KCS),使其适合中国文化背景,并验证其在中国全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者中的适用性:方法:中国河南省的全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者(N = 418,平均年龄≥64 岁)。对随机抽取的两个样本(样本数均为 208 人)进行了探索性和确认性因子分析。对 KCS 的心理测量特性进行了评估,包括内容效度、建构效度、预测效度和并发效度:KCS 量表显示出理想的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha:0.927)、测试-再测信度(0.936)和内容效度(0.958)。探索性和确认性因素分析显示并确认了七因素结构。曲线下面积为 0.852。KCS 的最佳临界值为 3.68:开发的中文版 KCS 在中国 TKA 患者中应用时既可靠又有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
期刊最新文献
Assessing subscapularis tears: Relationship between special tests and pain & tear severity. Analysis of orthopedic surgery-related incidents in operating rooms using a nationwide incident reporting database. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the kinesiophobia causes scale: A descriptive survey have undergone total knee arthroplasty in China. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer versus open complete repair for symptomatic massive rotator cuff tear. Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-29 and SF-36 instruments in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1