Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in elderly patients undergoing lumbar discectomy: a retrospective study on 163 patients.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-03059-8
Giuseppe Corazzelli, Sergio Corvino, Francesco Ricciardi, Valentina Pizzuti, Settimio Leonetti, Alessandro D'Elia, Marco Santilli, Fulvio Aloj, Gualtiero Innocenzi
{"title":"Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in elderly patients undergoing lumbar discectomy: a retrospective study on 163 patients.","authors":"Giuseppe Corazzelli, Sergio Corvino, Francesco Ricciardi, Valentina Pizzuti, Settimio Leonetti, Alessandro D'Elia, Marco Santilli, Fulvio Aloj, Gualtiero Innocenzi","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03059-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>The prevalence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has risen alongside the aging population, often necessitating neurosurgical intervention. However, managing antithrombotic medications in elderly patients with a history of major cardiovascular events (MACE) presents challenges, as treatment may require modification or cessation. This study aims to compare surgical outcomes among elderly patients receiving antithrombotic drugs and assess their impact and potential complications. The findings aim to inform the management of elderly patients with cardiovascular and spinal conditions undergoing neurosurgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single center. A total of 163 patients aged 60 or above who underwent lumbar discectomy for LDH were included. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their antithrombotic drug management: Group A (46 patients) replaced antiplatelet agents with low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention, Group B (54 patients) discontinued antiplatelet agents for primary prevention one week preoperatively and replaced them with LMWH, and Group C (63 patients) did not receive antithrombotic medication. Intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, and postoperative hospitalization were analyzed across all three groups. Continuous variables were compared between groups using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test, with significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss or surgical time among groups A, B, and C. Similarly, no significant differences were observed between groups B and C across all analyzed variables. No early or delayed hemorrhagic complications occurred perioperatively or during the 3-month postoperative follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study suggests that elective discectomy surgery in patients receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies may proceed without early complications and can be safely continued perioperatively. These findings have implications for the management of elderly patients requiring neurosurgical intervention in the context of cardiovascular comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"807"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03059-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: The prevalence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has risen alongside the aging population, often necessitating neurosurgical intervention. However, managing antithrombotic medications in elderly patients with a history of major cardiovascular events (MACE) presents challenges, as treatment may require modification or cessation. This study aims to compare surgical outcomes among elderly patients receiving antithrombotic drugs and assess their impact and potential complications. The findings aim to inform the management of elderly patients with cardiovascular and spinal conditions undergoing neurosurgery.

Methods: This retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single center. A total of 163 patients aged 60 or above who underwent lumbar discectomy for LDH were included. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their antithrombotic drug management: Group A (46 patients) replaced antiplatelet agents with low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention, Group B (54 patients) discontinued antiplatelet agents for primary prevention one week preoperatively and replaced them with LMWH, and Group C (63 patients) did not receive antithrombotic medication. Intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, and postoperative hospitalization were analyzed across all three groups. Continuous variables were compared between groups using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: No significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss or surgical time among groups A, B, and C. Similarly, no significant differences were observed between groups B and C across all analyzed variables. No early or delayed hemorrhagic complications occurred perioperatively or during the 3-month postoperative follow-up period.

Conclusions: The study suggests that elective discectomy surgery in patients receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies may proceed without early complications and can be safely continued perioperatively. These findings have implications for the management of elderly patients requiring neurosurgical intervention in the context of cardiovascular comorbidities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对接受腰椎间盘切除术的老年患者进行围手术期抗血栓治疗的管理:一项针对 163 名患者的回顾性研究。
背景情况:随着人口老龄化的加剧,腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的发病率也在上升,往往需要进行神经外科干预。然而,对于有重大心血管事件(MACE)病史的老年患者来说,管理抗血栓药物是一项挑战,因为治疗可能需要调整或停止。本研究旨在比较接受抗血栓药物治疗的老年患者的手术效果,并评估其影响和潜在并发症。研究结果旨在为接受神经外科手术的心血管和脊柱疾病老年患者的管理提供参考:这项回顾性观察研究在一个中心进行。共纳入了 163 名因 LDH 而接受腰椎间盘切除术的 60 岁或以上患者。根据患者的抗血栓药物治疗情况将其分为三组:A 组(46 名患者)使用小剂量阿司匹林替代抗血小板药物进行二级预防;B 组(54 名患者)在术前一周停用抗血小板药物进行一级预防,并使用 LMWH 替代;C 组(63 名患者)未使用抗血栓药物。对所有三组患者的术中失血量、手术时间和术后住院时间进行了分析。组间连续变量的比较采用双尾 Mann-Whitney 检验,显著性以 p 为标准:同样,在所有分析变量中,B 组和 C 组之间也未发现明显差异。在围手术期或术后 3 个月的随访期间,均未出现早期或延迟出血并发症:该研究表明,接受抗凝剂和抗血小板治疗的患者在进行选择性椎间盘切除手术时可能不会出现早期并发症,并且可以在围手术期安全地继续治疗。这些研究结果对治疗合并心血管疾病的神经外科老年患者具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Showcasing diversity, equity, and inclusion in neurological surgery: a comparative analysis of neurological surgery residency program websites in the United States. Anterior choroidal artery aneurysm case series: a clinical decision algorithm for endovascular and surgical treatment using a novel classification system. Minimally invasive neurosurgery: application of burr-hole technique across a spectrum of brain lesions. Oculomotor nerve palsy recovery following microsurgery vs. endovascular treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysms: a comparative meta-analysis of short- and long-term outcomes. Application of microsurgical surgery in patients with proximal vertebral artery stenosis unsuited for endovascular treatment: a single-center retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1