Swirling Flow Quantification in Helical Stents Using Ultrasound Velocimetry.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI:10.1177/15266028241283326
Ashkan Ghanbarzadeh-Dagheyan, Majorie van Helvert, Lennart van de Velde, Michel M P J Reijnen, Michel Versluis, Erik Groot Jebbink
{"title":"Swirling Flow Quantification in Helical Stents Using Ultrasound Velocimetry.","authors":"Ashkan Ghanbarzadeh-Dagheyan, Majorie van Helvert, Lennart van de Velde, Michel M P J Reijnen, Michel Versluis, Erik Groot Jebbink","doi":"10.1177/15266028241283326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Helical stents have been developed to treat peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the superficial femoral artery (SFA), with the premise that their particular geometry could promote swirling flow in the blood. The aim of this work is to provide evidence on the existence of this swirling flow by quantifying its signatures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study consists of in vitro and in vivo parts. For the in vitro part, 3 helical stent models of different helicity degrees and 1 straight model were fabricated, and the flow was assessed at the inlet and outlet of each model. For the in vivo part, only 1 patient, treated with the helical stent, was eligible to participate in the study. The stent implanted in the SFA of the patient was evaluated in 2 leg postures (straight and flexed), and flow was assessed in 12 locations along the SFA. The in vivo study was approved by an ethical board (NL80130.091.21) in the Netherlands. High-frame-rate ultrasound was used to acquire data from the regions of interest (ROIs), using microbubbles as contrast agents. After processing the data via a correlation-based algorithm (echo particle image velocimetry or echoPIV), the velocity vector field within each ROI was extracted and analyzed for parameters such as vector complexity and velocity profile skewedness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that in the outlet of the helical stents, when compared with the inlet, the flow vector field is more complex and the velocity profile is more skewed. For the in vivo case, the outcomes demonstrate more complexity and higher variability in the sign of skewedness inside the stent when compared with the flow in the proximal to the stent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Helical stents make the vector field of the flow more complex and the velocity profile more skewed, both of which are signatures of swirling flow. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether these features can benefit patients in terms of patency rates.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>This study demonstrates that helical stent models alter the blood flow when compared with straight stent models. Particularly, the flow grows more complex and its velocity profile becomes more skewed, both of which hint at the existence of swirling flow inside the helical stent. These observations, alongside with population-based studies that are currently being carried out, may provide the evidence that helical stents have some advantages over straight stents for the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028241283326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241283326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Helical stents have been developed to treat peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the superficial femoral artery (SFA), with the premise that their particular geometry could promote swirling flow in the blood. The aim of this work is to provide evidence on the existence of this swirling flow by quantifying its signatures.

Materials and methods: This study consists of in vitro and in vivo parts. For the in vitro part, 3 helical stent models of different helicity degrees and 1 straight model were fabricated, and the flow was assessed at the inlet and outlet of each model. For the in vivo part, only 1 patient, treated with the helical stent, was eligible to participate in the study. The stent implanted in the SFA of the patient was evaluated in 2 leg postures (straight and flexed), and flow was assessed in 12 locations along the SFA. The in vivo study was approved by an ethical board (NL80130.091.21) in the Netherlands. High-frame-rate ultrasound was used to acquire data from the regions of interest (ROIs), using microbubbles as contrast agents. After processing the data via a correlation-based algorithm (echo particle image velocimetry or echoPIV), the velocity vector field within each ROI was extracted and analyzed for parameters such as vector complexity and velocity profile skewedness.

Results: The results show that in the outlet of the helical stents, when compared with the inlet, the flow vector field is more complex and the velocity profile is more skewed. For the in vivo case, the outcomes demonstrate more complexity and higher variability in the sign of skewedness inside the stent when compared with the flow in the proximal to the stent.

Conclusions: Helical stents make the vector field of the flow more complex and the velocity profile more skewed, both of which are signatures of swirling flow. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether these features can benefit patients in terms of patency rates.

Clinical impact: This study demonstrates that helical stent models alter the blood flow when compared with straight stent models. Particularly, the flow grows more complex and its velocity profile becomes more skewed, both of which hint at the existence of swirling flow inside the helical stent. These observations, alongside with population-based studies that are currently being carried out, may provide the evidence that helical stents have some advantages over straight stents for the patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用超声测速仪量化螺旋支架中的漩涡流
目的:螺旋支架被开发用于治疗股浅动脉(SFA)的外周动脉疾病(PAD),前提是其特殊的几何形状可以促进血液中的漩涡流。这项工作的目的是通过量化漩涡流的特征,为这种漩涡流的存在提供证据:本研究由体外和体内两部分组成。在体外部分,制作了 3 个不同螺旋度的螺旋支架模型和 1 个直支架模型,并对每个模型的入口和出口处的流动情况进行了评估。在体内部分,只有一名使用螺旋支架治疗的患者有资格参与研究。在 2 种腿部姿势(直腿和屈腿)下对植入患者 SFA 的支架进行评估,并在沿 SFA 的 12 个位置对血流进行评估。这项体内研究获得了荷兰伦理委员会(NL80130.091.21)的批准。利用微气泡作为造影剂,通过高帧率超声波获取感兴趣区(ROI)的数据。通过基于相关性的算法(回波粒子图像测速或 echoPIV)处理数据后,提取每个 ROI 内的速度矢量场,并分析矢量复杂性和速度曲线倾斜度等参数:结果表明,与入口处相比,螺旋支架出口处的流速矢量场更加复杂,速度曲线更加倾斜。在活体情况下,结果表明,与支架近端相比,支架内部的偏斜迹象更加复杂,变异性更高:结论:螺旋支架使血流的矢量场更加复杂,速度曲线更加倾斜,这两者都是漩涡流的特征。临床影响:这项研究表明,与直支架模型相比,螺旋支架模型会改变血流。特别是,血流变得更加复杂,速度曲线也更加倾斜,这都暗示螺旋支架内部存在漩涡流。这些观察结果,加上目前正在进行的基于人群的研究,可以证明螺旋支架对患者来说比直支架更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
The Value of Different Systemic Inflammatory Response Indicators in the Long-term Prognosis of Type B Aortic Dissection Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair. Effect of Statins on the Prognosis After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Patients With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection. Potential of D-Dimer as a Tool to Rule Out Sac Expansion in Patients With Persistent Type 2 Endoleaks After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Long-Term Outcomes and Late Complications of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using the GORE TAG or Conformable GORE TAG. Long-term Outcomes of the AcoArt II-BTK Trial: Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Uncoated Balloons for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1