Temporal trend and regional disparity in the investigations for stable chest pain in Europe: An insight from the PIONEER IV trial.

Tsung-Ying Tsai, Patrick W Serruys, Joanna Wykrzykowska, Faisal Sharif, Liesbeth Rosseel, Edouard Benit, Mohammad Alkhalil, Kenneth De Wilder, Nick Curzen, Mick Renkens, Pruthvi C Revaiah, Andreas Baumbach, Pieter C Smits, Patrick Nash, Scot Garg, Marc Dewey, Thomas F Lüscher, Yoshinobu Onuma
{"title":"Temporal trend and regional disparity in the investigations for stable chest pain in Europe: An insight from the PIONEER IV trial.","authors":"Tsung-Ying Tsai, Patrick W Serruys, Joanna Wykrzykowska, Faisal Sharif, Liesbeth Rosseel, Edouard Benit, Mohammad Alkhalil, Kenneth De Wilder, Nick Curzen, Mick Renkens, Pruthvi C Revaiah, Andreas Baumbach, Pieter C Smits, Patrick Nash, Scot Garg, Marc Dewey, Thomas F Lüscher, Yoshinobu Onuma","doi":"10.1016/j.jcct.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and fractional flow reserve with CCTA (FFRCT) have been endorsed by the ACC/AHA Chest Pain guidelines to streamline the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), but there is still a significant lack of adherence. In our study of 673 stable chest patients without known CAD from 5 European countries, we found that CCTA is the most common noninvasive diagnostic test, but nearly 40 ​% of them still underwent upfront CAD. Additionally, there was no temporal improvement trend, and the integration of FFRCT is low. We highlighted the urgent need to improve diagnostic processes and update reimbursement policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2024.10.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and fractional flow reserve with CCTA (FFRCT) have been endorsed by the ACC/AHA Chest Pain guidelines to streamline the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), but there is still a significant lack of adherence. In our study of 673 stable chest patients without known CAD from 5 European countries, we found that CCTA is the most common noninvasive diagnostic test, but nearly 40 ​% of them still underwent upfront CAD. Additionally, there was no temporal improvement trend, and the integration of FFRCT is low. We highlighted the urgent need to improve diagnostic processes and update reimbursement policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲稳定型胸痛调查的时间趋势和地区差异:PIONEER IV 试验的启示。
冠状动脉 CT 血管造影 (CCTA) 和冠状动脉 CTA 分形血流储备 (FFRCT) 已被 ACC/AHA 胸痛指南批准用于简化冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的诊断,但仍存在严重的缺乏性。我们对来自 5 个欧洲国家的 673 名无已知 CAD 的稳定胸痛患者进行了研究,发现 CCTA 是最常见的无创诊断检查,但其中仍有近 40% 的患者接受了前期 CAD 检查。此外,CCTA 在时间上没有改善的趋势,而 FFRCT 的整合率也很低。我们强调了改进诊断流程和更新报销政策的迫切性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Highlights of the nineteenth annual scientific meeting of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography. Asessing the feasibility and accuracy of an on-site prototype workstation in assessing CT derived fractional flow reserve in severe aortic stenosis. Diagnostic performance of CCTA and CTP imaging for clinically suspected in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis. Cost-effectiveness of ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector coronary CT angiography for the evaluation of stable chest pain. Association of coronary inflammation with plaque vulnerability and fractional flow reserve in coronary artery disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1