COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INNOVATIVE HIGH-TECH CARDIAC SURGERY IN PATIENTS WHO HAVE SUFFERED AN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION.

Q4 Medicine Georgian medical news Pub Date : 2024-07-01
U Chulpanov, B Turdaliyeva, M Buleshov, N Zhanabaev, K Kemelbekov
{"title":"COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INNOVATIVE HIGH-TECH CARDIAC SURGERY IN PATIENTS WHO HAVE SUFFERED AN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION.","authors":"U Chulpanov, B Turdaliyeva, M Buleshov, N Zhanabaev, K Kemelbekov","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The proposed scientific article discusses the results of evaluating the medical and social effectiveness of innovative high-tech cardiac surgery for patients who have suffered an acute myocardial infarction. It was established that the inpatient mortality rate of patients who did not receive innovative high-tech cardiac surgery is significantly higher than in those patients who received it. These differences are particularly noticeable when comparing data among the elderly.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of implementing high-tech medical services in the field of cardiovascular system includes an analysis of medical and statistical, sociological methods, financial and economic, organizational and managerial methods, as well as an assessment of the level of application of relevant regulations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of a study using a logarithmic test showed that stenting of coronary vessels and aorta-coronary bypass surgery significantly reduce hospital mortality in patients with myocardial infarction in all age groups. The hospital mortality rate among patients of the main (who have received HTMC) age group was 0.96%, and among patients of the control (who haven't received HTMC) group - 11.84% (p=0.002). There was no significant reduction in mortality among the group of old patients (p=0.779). Thus, the largest difference in hospital mortality between the main and control groups was found only in elderly patients, p=0.002.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the effectiveness of the achieved success depends not only on the introduction of innovative technology, but also on the availability of highly qualified cardiac surgeons and basic medical material and technical resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":12610,"journal":{"name":"Georgian medical news","volume":" 352-353","pages":"190-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgian medical news","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proposed scientific article discusses the results of evaluating the medical and social effectiveness of innovative high-tech cardiac surgery for patients who have suffered an acute myocardial infarction. It was established that the inpatient mortality rate of patients who did not receive innovative high-tech cardiac surgery is significantly higher than in those patients who received it. These differences are particularly noticeable when comparing data among the elderly.

Material and methods: A comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of implementing high-tech medical services in the field of cardiovascular system includes an analysis of medical and statistical, sociological methods, financial and economic, organizational and managerial methods, as well as an assessment of the level of application of relevant regulations.

Results: The results of a study using a logarithmic test showed that stenting of coronary vessels and aorta-coronary bypass surgery significantly reduce hospital mortality in patients with myocardial infarction in all age groups. The hospital mortality rate among patients of the main (who have received HTMC) age group was 0.96%, and among patients of the control (who haven't received HTMC) group - 11.84% (p=0.002). There was no significant reduction in mortality among the group of old patients (p=0.779). Thus, the largest difference in hospital mortality between the main and control groups was found only in elderly patients, p=0.002.

Conclusion: the effectiveness of the achieved success depends not only on the introduction of innovative technology, but also on the availability of highly qualified cardiac surgeons and basic medical material and technical resources.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对急性心肌梗塞患者接受创新高科技心脏手术的效果进行比较评估。
拟发表的这篇科学文章讨论了对急性心肌梗死患者实施创新高科技心脏手术的医疗和社会效果进行评估的结果。结果表明,未接受创新高科技心脏手术的患者的住院死亡率明显高于接受该手术的患者。在比较老年人的数据时,这些差异尤为明显:对心血管系统领域高科技医疗服务实施效果的综合评估包括对医学和统计学方法、社会学方法、财务和经济方法、组织和管理方法的分析,以及对相关法规应用水平的评估:使用对数检验法的研究结果表明,冠状动脉血管支架植入术和主动脉-冠状动脉搭桥手术能显著降低各年龄组心肌梗死患者的住院死亡率。主要年龄组(接受过冠状动脉造影术)患者的住院死亡率为 0.96%,对照组(未接受过冠状动脉造影术)患者的住院死亡率为 11.84%(P=0.002)。老年患者组的死亡率没有明显降低(P=0.779)。结论:成功的有效性不仅取决于创新技术的引进,还取决于高素质的心脏外科医生和基本的医疗材料和技术资源的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Georgian medical news
Georgian medical news Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
207
期刊最新文献
ALOPECIA AREATA PROFILING SHOWS LNCRNAS REGULATE THE SUPPRESSED EXPRESSION OF KERATIN. ANALYSIS OF BLOOD PARAMETERS IN TYUMEN RESIDENTS WITH COVID-19 IN CATAMNESIS AND/OR VACCINATED AGAINST A NEW CORONAVIRUS INFECTION. ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES IN HEART RATE VARIABILITY INDICES OF STUDENTS AFTER COVID-19 LOCKDOWN: A COHORT STUDY. CHRONIC HEART FAILURE WITH PRESERVED LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION (HFPEF) AND RIGHT VENTRICLE INVOLVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL SINUS RHYTHM AND ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; A SMALL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY: RELEVANCE OF THE PROBLEM, DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH, ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF RIGHT VENTRICLE. CLINICAL MANIFESTATION AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF LEPTOSPIROSIS AT THE MODERN STAGE IN GEORGIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1