Focal Versus Combined Focal Plus Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Retrospective Study.

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.3390/jfmk9040201
Caterina Delia, Gabriele Santilli, Vincenzo Colonna, Valerio Di Stasi, Eleonora Latini, Antonello Ciccarelli, Samanta Taurone, Antonio Franchitto, Flavia Santoboni, Donatella Trischitta, Sveva Maria Nusca, Mario Vetrano, Maria Chiara Vulpiani
{"title":"Focal Versus Combined Focal Plus Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Caterina Delia, Gabriele Santilli, Vincenzo Colonna, Valerio Di Stasi, Eleonora Latini, Antonello Ciccarelli, Samanta Taurone, Antonio Franchitto, Flavia Santoboni, Donatella Trischitta, Sveva Maria Nusca, Mario Vetrano, Maria Chiara Vulpiani","doi":"10.3390/jfmk9040201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow, commonly known as tennis elbow, is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain and degeneration of the common extensor tendon. Despite various treatments, optimal management remains debated. <b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of focal extracorporeal shockwave therapy (F-ESWT) alone versus a combination of focal and radial pressure waves (F-ESWT+R-PW) in treating chronic lateral epicondylitis. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational study included 45 patients diagnosed with chronic lateral epicondylitis divided into two groups based on the treatment received: group A (F-ESWT, n = 23) and group B (F-ESWT+R-PW, n = 22). Both groups underwent three weekly sessions of their respective treatments. Patients were also given a home exercise protocol. Primary outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) for pain and functional impairment at baseline (T0), 4 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), and 24 weeks (T3) post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included grip strength and ultrasonographic measurements of common extensor tendon (CET) thickness and vascularization. <b>Results:</b> Significant improvements in VAS and PRTEE scores were observed in both groups at all follow-up points. Group B showed greater pain reduction at T1 (VAS: 3.0 ± 1.6 vs. 4.43 ± 1.47; <i>p</i> < 0.005) and T2 (VAS: <i>p</i> < 0.030) compared to group A. Functional outcomes (PRTEE) also favored group B at T1 (<i>p</i> < 0.030) and in the pain section at T2 (<i>p</i> < 0.020). Grip strength improved similarly in both groups. CET thickness showed no significant differences at T3. Vascularization decreased significantly in both groups, with a non-significant trend favoring group B. <b>Conclusions:</b> The combined F-ESWT+R-PW therapy proved more effective than F-ESWT alone in the short- to mid-term management of chronic lateral epicondylitis, significantly enhancing pain reduction and functional outcomes. The combination of focal and radial pressure waves offers a superior therapeutic approach, leveraging the distinct mechanisms of each modality for better clinical results. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and establish long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9040201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow, commonly known as tennis elbow, is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain and degeneration of the common extensor tendon. Despite various treatments, optimal management remains debated. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of focal extracorporeal shockwave therapy (F-ESWT) alone versus a combination of focal and radial pressure waves (F-ESWT+R-PW) in treating chronic lateral epicondylitis. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 45 patients diagnosed with chronic lateral epicondylitis divided into two groups based on the treatment received: group A (F-ESWT, n = 23) and group B (F-ESWT+R-PW, n = 22). Both groups underwent three weekly sessions of their respective treatments. Patients were also given a home exercise protocol. Primary outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) for pain and functional impairment at baseline (T0), 4 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), and 24 weeks (T3) post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included grip strength and ultrasonographic measurements of common extensor tendon (CET) thickness and vascularization. Results: Significant improvements in VAS and PRTEE scores were observed in both groups at all follow-up points. Group B showed greater pain reduction at T1 (VAS: 3.0 ± 1.6 vs. 4.43 ± 1.47; p < 0.005) and T2 (VAS: p < 0.030) compared to group A. Functional outcomes (PRTEE) also favored group B at T1 (p < 0.030) and in the pain section at T2 (p < 0.020). Grip strength improved similarly in both groups. CET thickness showed no significant differences at T3. Vascularization decreased significantly in both groups, with a non-significant trend favoring group B. Conclusions: The combined F-ESWT+R-PW therapy proved more effective than F-ESWT alone in the short- to mid-term management of chronic lateral epicondylitis, significantly enhancing pain reduction and functional outcomes. The combination of focal and radial pressure waves offers a superior therapeutic approach, leveraging the distinct mechanisms of each modality for better clinical results. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and establish long-term efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外冲击波疗法治疗肘外侧肌腱病的焦点疗法与焦点加桡侧联合疗法:回顾性研究
背景:肘部外上髁炎俗称网球肘,是一种肌肉骨骼疾病,以疼痛和普通伸肌腱退化为特征。尽管治疗方法多种多样,但最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。研究目的本研究旨在比较单纯病灶体外冲击波疗法(F-ESWT)与病灶和径向压力波组合疗法(F-ESWT+R-PW)治疗慢性外上髁炎的效果。方法:这项回顾性观察研究纳入了45名被诊断为慢性外侧上髁炎的患者,根据所接受的治疗分为两组:A组(F-ESWT,n = 23)和B组(F-ESWT+R-PW,n = 22)。两组患者均每周接受三次治疗。患者还接受了家庭锻炼方案。在治疗后的基线(T0)、4周(T1)、12周(T2)和24周(T3),使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛,并使用患者评分网球肘评估(PRTEE)评估疼痛和功能障碍。次要结果包括握力和普通伸肌腱 (CET) 厚度和血管化的超声波测量。结果在所有随访点,两组的 VAS 和 PRTEE 评分均有显著改善。与 A 组相比,B 组在 T1(VAS:3.0 ± 1.6 vs. 4.43 ± 1.47;p < 0.005)和 T2(VAS:p < 0.030)的疼痛减轻程度更大。功能结果(PRTEE)在 T1(p < 0.030)和 T2(p < 0.020)的疼痛部分也有利于 B 组。两组的握力改善情况相似。CET 厚度在 T3 时无明显差异。两组的血管生成均明显减少,B 组的趋势不明显:事实证明,在慢性外上髁炎的中短期治疗中,F-ESWT+R-PW 联合疗法比单独使用 F-ESWT 更有效,能明显减轻疼痛并改善功能。病灶压力波和径向压力波的结合提供了一种更优越的治疗方法,充分利用了每种模式的不同机制,从而获得更好的临床效果。要证实这些研究结果并确立长期疗效,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Focal Versus Combined Focal Plus Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Retrospective Study. Longitudinal Associations Between Physical Activity and Sedentary Time and Cardiorespiratory and Muscular Fitness in Preschoolers. Acute Effect of Fixed vs. Self-Selected Rest Interval Between Sets on Physiological and Performance-Related Responses. Relationship Between Frequency of Physical Activity, Functional Mobility, and Self-Perceived Health in People with Different Levels of Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study. Qualitative Analysis of Micro-System-Level Factors Determining Sport Persistence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1